• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Queen "disappears" Canadian Mohawk children, Maloney outs Prince Charles, Dunblane

i began reading it, and will finish after this- but, understandably for such a site - they seem to be tiptoeing upon the

issue. have loved ones w/ secondary cancer, hence my research into this matter about a year ago.
the reason b17 carries

with it such controversy - is due to the insidious nature of big pharma & the medical industry per se. in fact, the

initially 'preeminent' study which trashed the reputation of & with bad science, linked - b17 to health dangers, was

was conducted in half by the same researcher whose study gave tobacco one of its early green passes - iow, he's a shill

the study linked amygdalin with cyanide & the US ban came shortly thereafter
drs lose their careers if they recommend it

even wikipedia carries this legacy - declaring 'too many apricot kernals can produce symptoms of cyanide poisoning'

absolute nonsense
here comes the science!
as with all most heinous of lies, there is a modicum of truth inside; b17 does

indeed contain cyanide. in fact its molecule is comprised of two of the most powerful poisons known to man -

benzoformaldehyde & cyanide. but crucially - they are bound & thus completely harmless the other two components

of the b17 bound molecule are both natural sugars.
it is mother natures perfect weapon against cancer
each poison & each

sugar portion of b17 is protected from activation by a protein sheath. the genius being; the only chemical that unbinds

the two poisons is ONLY given off within the body by cancerous cells. EVERY other, healthy cell similarly NULLIFIES them

conversely, every non-cancerous cell gives off the chemical needed to unbind the two sugars - so b17, with utter

perfection indicative of nature - actually kills all cancer cells while feeding healthy cells. it is completely safe,
 
Last edited by a moderator:
effective & cheap - hence why big pharma throws its considerable weight against its deployment - via shill studies etc
for wild animals - cancer is almost unheard of. crucially, they only get it when we start feeding them our food
same with pre-us colonial japan- cancer was almost unknown. lo & behold, they move to america, they begin getting it too.

If you toss a monkey familar with them, an apricot - they will tear the flesh away & eat the stone.
same as horses who lick salt - mammals who eat mud - birds swallowing stones... it makes no sense, yet it makes all the sense in the world
you must remember, most folk blindly let the insidious medical cancer carousel bombard them with carcinogenic radiation
and/or chemicals. get a brain tumour, they may even part-lobotomise you, as they did a loved one of mine. and when they
finally wash their hands of you, as beyond help - thats when most folk, in desperation - turn to things like b17. so its
a bit unfair as a direct comparison. though some of the case studies are amazing, people riddled with tumours throughout their
body, bones.. blood - left to die by doctors - have gone on to make complete recoveries. my opinion for matters such as
- having seen the torture that passes for 21st century treatment - is that anything with conjectural healing testimony,

- that remains banned by the powers that be - such as b17, or marijuana.. is probably the miracle cure you just dared
to believe may be out there.








phew.
~done
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can a mod merge that last lot into one tinfoil post or supply bhm with a decent phone..
 
BHM...get a new phone.

And if you'd bothered to read the whole thing I linked your mind would have been put at rest and you wouldn't have had to post any of that at all. He's not saying it gives you cyanide poisoning, he's not saying its a miracle cure but he does document several anecdotal stories from people who believe what you apparently believe.
 
I will contribute as little as possible to this thread. I will say these things however....


For future reference as a previous horse owner all my life. That of many horses This is salt lick It does provide a purpose. Especially in drier places that sees the grass die out in autumn. I'll not go on about equestrian matters. You can Wiki it.

As for big pharms and just all in all conspiracy....

On February 5th 2003 my mother died of Hep C. Docs didn't know how long she'd had it and no one knows where she contracted it from. She was a teetotaler basically. My thoughts on the matter are my own and not open to debate.
The point of the matter is, she died because she couldn't afford the meds that would have kept her alive on the American medical system. She did her best with healthy living and vits etc. She held out until I got back to the states. She died two weeks after I got there. I'll not leave my pain here. It's not the place. I, However, will leave my honesty and a bit of anger.

She could have been saved! She just didn't have health insurance.

And people ask me why I don't move back, they also complain about the NHS. Some people don't realise how good you have it over here.


EDIT: SHM, That's what mods are for. Fixed...
 
Last edited:
As for big pharma, America, and out and out conspiracy (though doesn't this really belong in the recent HIV money-making thread?)...

...the research and treatment for the cancer I had, prostate cancer, is completely dominated by the USA. Anyone going to their GP or hospital, be that NHS or Private, will be told "the answer to this is radical prostatectomy".

You know why? Because that's the way America does it. And why does America do it that way?

Because it makes each surgeon who performs one approximately $30000 per operation.

Further research has been stunted because of this. Side effects of radical prostatectomy are played down, leaving young men with no sex lives and/or pissing down their legs for life. To perform a radical prostatectomy successfully you have to be a Nijinsky of the knife. Anyone with less than 1000 operations under their belt can be considered a beginner. The surgery is that difficult. If you don't believe me, go find a really good detailed medical text book. Check out where the prostate is. Check out the crucial nerves that are within fractions of millimetres of the prostate.

I took a different route. It's called HIFU. High Intensity Focused Ultrasound. After ten years practice, this new 'surgery' is still not totally accepted as a viable alternative. It has something like a 96% success rate. I still have a sex life. I don't piss down my leg.

But the HIFU costs, relatively, tuppence. About $30000 less than a prostatectomy.

Fuck America.
 
Last edited:
Fuck America indeed!

I fucking hate those cunts.

Okay, I'll stop ranting now...

On a happier note as I'm just running out the door to work and cannot afford the time to be so eloquent. I'm glad you get to shag and don't piss down your leg.

I do loves you SHM! Make no mistake! <3 And you know this xxx
 
StoneHappyMonday said:
My list was by no means exhaustive and garlic does indeed have anti-cancer properties (though science is yet to work out why). It is particularly effective in stomach, gastric and colon cancers. There are widespread studies showing this. Thing is though, the garlic has to be fresh, chopped or squeezed. Cooking the garlic has been shown to make the anti-cancer properties all but inactive. Garlic has also been shown to work against the side effects of radiotherapy, particularly DNA and chromosome damage.
Click to expand...

Cheers for that. I dint know that cooking the garlic makes it all but inactive. I dont doubt you about the studies, thats encouraging that there is now evidence. From what i could gather the evidence was 'patchy' last time i read about it (several years ago) I sometimes put in my meals during the last few seconds before turning off the heat, purely because it retains a stronger taste that way, I'll try turn the heat off completely when i add it from now on (maybe, only problem being that the garlicy bits dont 'spread' so well throughout the meal that way.
 
Here's one for your tinfoil hat lot blue light has secret set of forums invite only and that's where everyone has gone to with just the odd person popping up to see if there are any newbies to invite
 
I wear my splendid tinfoil hat with pride but I'm afraid that's not the case, FG. BL is just plain dead :\

There is a kinda back-up BL that people occasionally use when BL itself goes down but it's not invite only so much as just very rarely used and rarely mentioned. Been years since I last saw it in use though and couldn't tell you if anybody is currently using it. Not even entirely sure what it's called it's been so long but think it's called Backlight. Could be wrong but somebody will know.
 
Well, Sham, I must admit that you do look damn sexy in that tin foil hat of yours. Then again, you're just damn sexy!


HAHAHA Space. SHHHHHHH They'll know! 8o
 
spacejunk said:
I thought he meant the staff forum.
Oops, i say too much??? 8o
Click to expand...

Sadie said:
HAHAHA Space. SHHHHHHH They'll know! 8o
Click to expand...

Ha! Well I guess they do technically fulfil the criteria of being invite-only and occasionally bringing in a few noobs :D

Sadie said:
Well, Sham, I must admit that you do look damn sexy in that tin foil hat of yours. Then again, you're just damn sexy!
Click to expand...

serveimage
 
I think for both our sakes It should be noted that I find you much sexier than a squirrel. That would be rather worrying if I didn't.

You'd be sus any time I went for a walk in the woods on my own. Eyeballing all those sexy ass squirrels. SHAKE THAT TAIL!
 
Anyone watching the BBC1 programme about all this tonight? Wonder how much truth will be in it, 5%?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top