• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Shambles

Queen "disappears" Canadian Mohawk children, Maloney outs Prince Charles, Dunblane

They're numb alright but it's got nothing to do with the all-out-lies, twisted truths or onslaughts of pure hatred. It's genetic!

I'm sure you all knew I'd be back today. Sammy's warming up his Icke photo's as I write this.

Just popping in coz my friends Jimmy & Cliff are back in the news today!

Jimmy - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31611191

Savile dodged a dozen complaints about him & his knighthood was cleared personally by Thatcher despite the accusations against him & common knowledge about his activities. Friends in high places eh?

Cliff - http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...tigation-increasing-in-size-says-police-chief

Cliff has moved to Barabados! Despite cooperating fully with the investigation, he's moved to a country with no extradition treaty with the UK, from one that does (Portugal).

Anyone know where Richard was interviewed by Police? I understand he has not returned to the UK since his home was raided in August last year. Did we fly coppers out to Portugal to interview him?

Let's just tag this onto the bottom, seeing we're on the subject - http://www.express.co.uk/news/royal...apes-documentary-fear-of-upsetting-the-Palace
 
Last edited:
Lack of empathy is the overarching signal that marks out a psychopath - when you lack empathy you can screw with peolple in any fashion with conscience getting in the way. nature or nurture? genetics? brain chemistry? - I believe some are just born bad and go on to commit awful things to others, tho one can be brainwashed to brutilise others - look at the poor boy soldiers in central africa.
 
The boy soldiers are smoking weed all day long and being indoctranated by the 'elders', forced to do unspeakable things until it becomes 'normal'
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-31908431

Cyril Smith was protected in the 1980's, and officers who wanted to proceed with charges were threatened with prosecution themselves under the official secrets act and ordered to hand over their notebooks and evidence for destruction. Smith was arrested and released within hours after being caught on a secret video camera abusing children.
 
I know it's not PC to say this but I'd love an hour in a locked room with a Jammy Saville, Cyril Smith, Ian Huntley or whoever character. I'd batter the cunt into unconsciousness, bring him round then start again. One of my trainers when I was a student paramedic told me a story of being called to a house where they caught a guy raping a two year old baby and he battered the cunt, called the cops who then took it in turns to batter the cunt as well...this was in the '70s though....I doubt you could do that today but if I ever came across someone doing that I'd do it anyway....

Evil bastards.....
 
BecomingJulie said:
Thing is, without understanding why Savile / Smith / Watkins / whoever did what they did, what chance have we got of ever preventing it from happening over and over again in future?
Click to expand...

Stop giving them their own TV shows? Stop giving them protection above the law? Do away with the ridiculous status afforded to celebrity?

That's only slightly facetious. To a large extent they did it because they could, just like people climb Everest because it is there. If we as a society decide we don't like such behaviour then it is up to society to build in safeguards against encouragement of such behaviour.

Remove the Sherpas.
 
englandgz74 said:
I know it's not PC to say this but I'd love an hour in a locked room with a Jammy Saville, Cyril Smith, Ian Huntley or whoever character. I'd batter the cunt into unconsciousness, bring him round then start again......
Click to expand...

I know it's cliche to say but two wrongs don't make a right, just a massive wrong with another not so bad wrong on top - so just more wrong than we started with. An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. (and as for what you could get away with in the 70s and can't now, ask jammy)
 
StoneHappyMonday said:
Stop giving them their own TV shows? Stop giving them protection above the law? Do away with the ridiculous status afforded to celebrity?
Click to expand...

& stop covering everything up, perhaps? Might help the understanding of these sorts of people if their crimes were not being hushed up by the powers-that-be...

http://exaronews.com/articles/5529/ministers-block-move-to-lift-official-secrets-act-for-csa-scandal

I can't copy & paste from Exaro but this article is about how Special Branch members were threatened with the official secrets act when they tried to expose powerful, elite paedophiles. There was talk of lifting the official secrets act from these individuals so that they might speak freely about what they had been investigating, but according to this piece Ministers including Theresa May have refused to permit the lifting of the official secrets act under any circumstances. Despite claiming that the official secrets act should not be used to prevent ex-Policemen from coming forward, May herself voted against the ammendment that would be permit exactly that.

Bothered by hyprocrites covering up the crimes of paedophiles?

!Vote Green!
 
Ya know, all these recent revelations about historical child abuse in the establishment has made me look at conspiracy theories in a new light. I think we tend to dismiss these ideas because we don't want to believe them. Thats how Saville and his ilk get away with it. Furthermore, there's no reason to believe that this type of thing is not still carrying on to this day. In 30 odd years time we'll probably (hopefully) discover that George Osbourne and Theresa May were the Fred & Rose Wests of the 21st century :)
 
More from exaro saying Panorama are planning an investigation which debunks vip paedo stories, but bbc news are unhappy about this in light of recent revelations...

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5527/bbc-at-war-over-panorama-on-claims-of-vip-paedophile-network

I was expecting some debunking to try and muddy the waters. I'd noticed in the last round of stories last week that the focus was almost entirely on cyril smith - i got the feeling they'd try and make him a saville character to hang it all on (but how credible is it that the state/establishment would bother if it was just him when he was a liberal bottom feeder (and jeremy thorpe wasn't far in the past))
 
did anyone see all that hampstead stuff? fucked up beyond belief whether true or not. Then in the news the other day there was something about a british airways pilot. the Cyril smith stuff is revolting. It is all the covering up that gets done that is very bad.
 
pinkpapaver said:
did anyone see all that hampstead stuff? fucked up beyond belief whether true or not. Then in the news the other day there was something about a british airways pilot. the Cyril smith stuff is revolting. It is all the covering up that gets done that is very bad.
Click to expand...

What is this Hamptead stuff of which you speak..?

Ya know, all these recent revelations about historical child abuse in the establishment has made me look at conspiracy theories in a new light. I think we tend to dismiss these ideas because we don't want to believe them. Thats how Saville and his ilk get away with it. Furthermore, there's no reason to believe that this type of thing is not still carrying on to this day. In 30 odd years time we'll probably (hopefully) discover that George Osbourne and Theresa May were the Fred & Rose Wests of the 21st century
Click to expand...

There is absolutely no reason to believe this stuff is all historic, that is for certain. Kids & teens are going missing from home, & from care, every day, & some of them are never, ever found. This is not a conspiracy theory, this is fact.

Vurtual said:
More from exaro saying Panorama are planning an investigation which debunks vip paedo stories, but bbc news are unhappy about this in light of recent revelations...

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5527/bbc-at-war-over-panorama-on-claims-of-vip-paedophile-network

I was expecting some debunking to try and muddy the waters. I'd noticed in the last round of stories last week that the focus was almost entirely on cyril smith - i got the feeling they'd try and make him a saville character to hang it all on (but how credible is it that the state/establishment would bother if it was just him when he was a liberal bottom feeder (and jeremy thorpe wasn't far in the past))
Click to expand...

Am I wasting my time harrassing the Beeb to report the OSA vote? lol
 
This one's doubly topical - it's got the paedo network and the state hassling the SNP

SNP-activist-killed-over-child-sex-files http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/541793/SNP-activist-killed-over-child-sex-files

Willie McRae was said to have discovered child abuse by cabinet ministers and other leading members of the establishment on both sides of the Border. Shortly before his death he was seen photocopying a dossier of names in case something should happen to him.

The copies are understood to have been posted to a number of close associates. Despite a lengthy inquiry, the Sunday Express has been unable to establish whether any copies of the alleged dossier are still in existence.

McRae never went public with his allegations as he was found shot dead in his car off a remote road in Wester Ross on April 6, 1985.

Some maintain he was murdered by the security services over his opposition to plans to dump nuclear waste in Scotland, while others have said he was silenced by drug smugglers.
Significantly, however, his death also fits the timeline of recent claims about Westminster perverts and a massive police cover-up of child abuse and murder in the early 1980s.

...

Mrs Borders said: “Willie McRae got that information, and being the kind of man he was, he could not just sit on it. Unfortunately he spoke of the list to somebody he should not have which was his downfall.

“It is easy to sound like a conspiracy theorist – but at times conspiracy theories are proven true.

“Why not stage a car accident, his Volvo wrapped around a tree? God knows that has been done in the past. No. It was made to look like suicide – except, of course, it wasn’t.
“It was a message to leave matters well alone, and those in the know took it just as it was intended.”

Another source close to Mr Fraser said he had learned of the existence of the alleged dossier from a member of staff in Mr McRae’s office.

Some years ago, McRae was linked with another document describing a network of high-ranking Scottish paedophiles – dubbed The Untouchables – based on the deathbed confession of child abuser James Gallogley. But this dossier was dismissed as a hoax.

Earlier this month, it emerged that Police Scotland has set up a team of detectives to investigate claims of child abuse involving the late Solicitor General Sir Nicholas Fairbairn MP and other high-ranking Scottish legal figures from the same era.

Mrs Borders said she believed McRae’s dossier named powerful men from both sides of the Border, and he was “well on his way” to going public.

Before leaving Glasgow for his cottage near Kintail, Wester Ross, the 62-year-old showed a briefcase of documents to a friend, PC Donald Morrison, and told him: “I’ve got them this time.”

However, despite phoning ahead to ask for the fire to be lit, he never made it to his destination.

Instead, his body was found the next morning off the A87, with a bullet wound to his head. A gun was near the car leading to the suicide verdict.

His briefcase or the documents it contained have never been found.

Mrs Borders added: “McRae had worked so hard to expose this disgusting cancer. He knew it was dangerous which is why he made the back-up copies – not that anything has ever come of them.

“He had been due to leave Glasgow much earlier than he did, but his tyres had been slashed. That’s not something that’s widely known.

“In those days nobody wanted to be on the Highland roads at night. There was nothing open after 9pm. Yet he only headed up the road at 6.30pm knowing it would take him until late to reach his destination. The only reason is somebody made sure he would be alone on the roads.”

Calls for a public inquiry have been unsuccessful despite the fact the gun had been fired twice and was found some distance from the car.

Furthermore, although McRae was not wearing gloves, there were no fingerprints on the firearm.
Click to expand...

Craig Murray on this - https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2015/04/willie-mcrae/#comments

It is peculiar timing for the unionist rag The Scotsman, to declare it had solved the mystery of Willie McRae’s death – just when security service tasking on the SNP returns to the levels of 1975-86.

The Scotsman claims that the police had first removed the vehicle and then replaced it, and this explains the mystery of why the gun was so far from the car after McRae’s remarkable two shot “suicide”. For me, that adds just another level of improbability to so very many. How, inside a car, you shoot yourself in the head in such a way that the gun falls out of the window, seems problematic. The car was crashed over a burn; how you order that with the suicide is peculiar.

The case is a notorious one in Scotland. There was never any indication of McRae having suicidal tendencies. He was driving to a destination – his cottage – where he was expected and he had phoned ahead for the fires to be lit. A briefcase of documents went missing from his car. Several retired policemen have affirmed he was under police and security service surveillance, which since his death the authorities refuse to comment on. He was not only a leading member of the SNP, but an effective anti-nuclear activist. All that I already knew – what was new to me was that he had also been investigating a senior paedophile ring. It is tempting to put that together with his having been ADC to Louis Mountbatten, but I confess that is mere speculation.

Establishment lackeys have been trying to ridicule my assertion that the SNP is a major security service target. Many know they are lying, and deliberately are trying to distract. But for those who are actually naïve, is it not extraordinary that anytime anybody mentions anything the security services do, it is dismissed as “conspiracy theory”. GCHQ, MI5, MI6 and SO15 employ over 50,000 people between them. What do you actually think they do all day?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Nice work Vurt!

Y'all ready to vote in the old bitches new government?

Five Surprising Powers British Monarchs Still Retain


The announcement that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have welcomed a son has been greeted with much speculation. Will Kate practice attachment parenting? Will he be greeted with as devoted a group of would-be brides as the so-dubbed “Harry hunters” that are doing their best to snag the hand (and heart) of the last single British prince?

Here at Hippo, we’re asking different questions. In this heyday of democracy and equality, what exactly sets the royals apart? What powers do they still have that the average British citizen does not? As we’ve found out, the answer is quite a lot. Without further ado, here are five powers the constitutional British monarchy still has the ability to exercise when and if they chose to do so.


1. The monarch can choose the prime minister.

Although the post is democratically elected and the reigning monarch of England has the ceremonial duty of selecting whichever minister is in the majority, according to the letter of English law, the prime minister can be both appointed and dismissed by the monarch. Apologists for the continuation of the monarchy agree that while in theory, the monarch may choose to exercise this power, the result in a twenty-first century Britain of using it in a way other than ceremonial would be catastrophic and as such, highly unlikely.


2. The monarch can veto laws brought by parliament.

An illuminating 2013 article in the Guardian explains, “ministers and civil servants are obliged to consult the Queen and Prince Charles in greater detail and over more areas of legislation than was previously understood.” The article reveals that secret papers have been recently released, demonstrating the scope and breath of the recent applications of this controversial and secretive power of veto.

(I wonder if this is why cannabis is not being legalised? Secretive veto by queen bitch? Si)

3. The monarch retains “crown” immunity.

Not only is the reigning monarch considered completely above the law and immune from all criminal and civil actions, this immunity also extends to servants of the crown including prime ministers.


4. The monarch formally reigns over sixteen realms considered part of the British Commonwealth as well as fourteen Overseas Territories.

Though the sun has set on the once majestic and mighty British Empire, the trappings of past glory remain. The monarch of Great Britain retains sovereignty as well as a surprising parcel of powers, including confirming elected governments of or over the following countries: Antigua, Australia, the Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Canada, Grenada, Jamaica, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Saint Kitts, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent, Solomon Islands, Tuvalu and of course – the United Kingdom.


5. Allegiance from members of parliament, bishops of the Church of England, police officers and soldiers goes not to the government of Great Britain but directly to the monarch alone.

Although the distinction may seem pedantic, residents of the United Kingdom or commonwealth countries are not considered citizens. Aside from the word “citizen” on British passports, there is no legal document or declaration that grants citizenship to residents of the United Kingdom. Rather, they are subjects to the crown and whichever monarch reigns. All officers of the government, military and police forces included, swear their allegiance to the Crown alone.
Click to expand...

from - http://read.hipporeads.com/five-surprising-powers-british-monarchs-still-retain/
 
the whole thing is wretched and disgusting - money and power is what these people crave and their taste for the most revolting appetite. 'old money' has always ruled this country feudalism never died.
 
It's an archaic and corrupt set-up for sure, but did anybody not already know any of the 'surprising' facts presented above? It's kinda what a constitutional monarchy is supposed to be. Not that I support constitutional monarchy, or monarchy full stop.

You've taken me right back to 'A'-Level history though, and Kelsie, who used to sit by me. Those were the days.
 
^

Indeed. Regarding point five for example. Google 'army regiment names'. See how many start with "King's", "Queen's", "Royal" or even "Princess of Wales's".

This kinda helps explain why army barracks, whether here or in Afghanistan or anywhere we have engaged wogs the 'enemy' in the world, are replete with portraits of Her Majesty. Imagine that. You're going to war. You have to transport a fuck off 32mm gun (whatever) and the odd tank or two all over the world. And you have to take fucking portraits of the monarchy with you too.

Idiots.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top