Push to Market Pill Stirs Debate on Sexual Desire

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
Push to Market Pill Stirs Debate on Sexual Desire
By DUFF WILSON
Published: June 16, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/business/17sexpill.html


Ever since Viagra met blockbuster success in 1998, the drug industry has sought a similar pill for women.

Now, a German drug giant says it has stumbled upon such a pill and is trying to persuade the Food and Drug Administration that its drug can help restore a depressed female sex drive. The effort has set off a debate over what constitutes a normal range of sexual desire among women, with critics saying the company is trying to turn a low libido into a medical pathology.

On Wednesday, an F.D.A. staff report recommended against approving the drug, saying the maker, Boehringer Ingelheim, had not made its case and that the benefits of the daily pill did not outweigh its side effects, which included dizziness, nausea and fatigue.

That staff report came ahead of a meeting Friday by an F.D.A. advisory panel of experts who are to vote on whether to recommend that the agency approve the pill, which would be the first drug aimed specifically at a low sex drive in premenopausal women.

F.D.A. staff reports carry weight but do not always sway how advisory panels vote, and advisory votes do not always predict what the F.D.A. might finally decide.

Some analysts forecast that if the drug does reach the market, it could have annual sales in this country of $2 billion — or about equal to the current combined annual American sales of the men’s drugs Viagra, Levitra and Cialis.

In the last month, Boehringer has been trying to lay the consumer groundwork with a promotional campaign about women’s low libido, including a Web site, a Twitter feed, a Discovery Channel documentary and a publicity tour by Lisa Rinna, a soap opera star and former Playboy model, who describes herself as someone who has suffered from a disorder that Boehringer refers to as a form of “female sexual dysfunction.”

There is no dispute that some women have a depressed level of sexual desire that causes them anguish. Boehringer cites a condition — hypoactive sexual desire disorder — that is included in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, a reference book for psychiatrists and insurers.

But many experts say that unlike sexual dysfunction in men — which has an obvious physical component — sexual problems in women are much harder to diagnose. And among doctors and researchers, there is serious medical debate over whether female sexual problems are treatable with drugs. Some doctors advocate psychotherapy or counseling, while others have prescribed hormonal drugs approved for other uses.

There is also debate over how widespread hypoactive sexual desire disorder actually is among women. The medical literature, including articles in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine, indicate numbers above 10 percent, but such studies have been financed by drug companies.

Critics say Boehringer’s market campaign exaggerates the prevalence of the condition and could create anxiety among women, making them think they have a condition that requires medical treatment.

“This is really a classic case of disease branding,” said Dr. Adriane Fugh-Berman, an associate professor at Georgetown University’s medical school who researches drug marketing and has studied the campaign. “The messages are aimed at medicalizing normal conditions, and also preying on the insecurity of both the clinician and the patient.”

Boehringer developed the drug, flibanserin, as an antidepressant, but it failed to lift depression. The company says it learned serendipitously that the pill, taken daily for weeks, could restore female libido.

Dr. Peter J. Piliero, Boehringer’s director of medical affairs in the United States, says the lack of libido to the point of distress is a serious problem for some women.

“This is a real disease,” Dr. Piliero said in an interview. “There’s an unmet medical need among premenopausal women to have a treatment.”

Boehringer says the drug reduces the brain chemical serotonin, which can blunt sexual desire, and increases dopamine and norepinephrine, which improve desire, the company said. By acting on a woman’s brain, it takes a different approach from hormonal drugs or the action of Viagra for men, which increases blood flow.

Boehringer’s application for F.D.A. approval said that its two key 24-month studies, of 1,323 premenopausal women who said they suffered distress over lack of libido, had found small but statistically significant improvements. The women lived in the United States or Canada, were mostly married, well-educated and found to have the sexual desire disorder but were otherwise healthy.

In results reported last fall at a medical conference in Europe, the drug was found to increase self-reported “sexually satisfying events” to 4.5 a month on average. The reported events, which did not have to include orgasm, compared with 3.7 a month by women taking a placebo and 2.7 by those who did not take any pills.

The F.D.A. staff report on Wednesday, though, said that Boehringer’s data had not sufficiently demonstrated a second criteria the agency had set for approving such a drug — specifically, that women also report an increased level of sexual desire. The F.D.A. required daily self-reporting by the women in the studies; Boehringer said it had provided monthly reports.

Lara Crissey, a spokeswoman for Boehringer, declined to comment on the F.D.A. staff report.

Other drug companies that have sought a drug to elevate women’s sexual desire have included Pfizer, which spent several years trying to show that its drug Viagra could work for women as well as men. When Pfizer ended that research in 2004, it said in a news release that female sexual disorders resulted “from a broad range of medical and psychological conditions.”

Procter & Gamble sought F.D.A. approval for a skin patch to raise the testosterone levels of women who had had their uterus and ovaries removed, but it was rejected in 2004 because of possible links to breast cancer and cardiovascular disease. In 2006, though, European regulators, saying the testosterone patch appeared safe at low doses, approved that drug to treat depressed sexual desire in women whose uterus and ovaries had been surgically removed.

BioSante Pharmaceuticals, a company in Illinois, is in late-stage testing of another testosterone patch product which it hopes to submit to the F.D.A. next year. And Vivus, a drug development company, is testing a testosterone-based daily abdominal spray for women which it says has proved effective in early trials. And other research is focusing on the antidepressant buproprion, better known as Wellbutrin or Zyban.

Dr. Steven E. Nissen, a Cleveland Clinic cardiologist and a member of the 2004 F.D.A. panel that unanimously rejected the testosterone patch, said that the depressed desire disorder was a real medical condition, especially for middle-age or older women, with both physiological and psychological causes.

“I got a lot of hate mail after that vote,” Dr. Nissen recalled. “People wrote me and said, ‘You men have your Viagra, why are you denying us this?’ I said hey, I’m just trying to do the right thing. It needs to be scientifically sound.”

Dr. Nissen said he had not studied the Boehringer drug.

Leonore Tiefer, a psychologist and professor at New York University who has researched the topic of female sexual desire for more than a decade and plans to testify to the F.D.A. panel on Friday, said Boehringer had gone too far with its publicity effort.

“Women’s sex lives are often a struggle, a disappointment, an archipelago of regret,” she said. “Is there a small group of women who could benefit from medical intervention — probably.”

But she said that if the drug were approved, she worried that “the much larger group of women without any medical reason for their sexual distress will inevitably be misinformed and misled into thinking that there is a pill that can get them the sex life they read about, the one they think everyone else is having.”

Boehringer has also sponsored medical education classes for doctors and nurses about hypoactive sexual desire disorder.

In one course, released online in May, a quiz asked doctors to diagnose the condition of a 42-year-old working mother who takes care of three children and her own sick mother, and who had no desire for sex. (Her husband is mentioned only in passing.)

The correct answer? Schedule a follow-up visit to evaluate whether she has diagnosable hypoactive sexual desire disorder.
 
^^^ that's exactly what makes me uncomfortable about this.

Usually when a woman isn't interested in sex, it's because of something in her lifestyle or her emotional past ... in other words, something she can handle in her own way if that's what she wants. Depersonalizing it and generalizing it into a "disorder" that can be "treated" just takes female sexuality out of the hands of females, and I can't support that. I imagine there are women out there who will be extremely happy to see this on the market, and they should have the right to use it, but any kind of advertisement of it REALLY turns me off ... if a woman doesn't want to have sex, it's not necessarily because there's a problem with her that deserves medication. It MIGHT be, but it might also be because she doesn't understand her own sexuality enough to take care of it on her own, and I don't think it's helpful to give someone like that a pill that makes them horny. It might prevent them from developing emotionally through sex, and that's so incredibly valuable that I can't get behind anything that might prevent it.
 
Have to agree with pans-advocate.
70% of males who take Viagra etc. don't need it either.
It's mostly psychological. BUT not a mental disorder.
Women especially aren't wired to want sex all the time. It's natural.
As much as men want the unnatural; a woman as horny as a man, it rarely happens.
I could imagine if a woman went on this and had tonnes of sex and then later on went off it and realised how stupid it was. It would fuck with her head I imagine.

Of course there could be a very small minority of women who actually need something like this. Then that's okay.
 
I think it's a disturbing continuance in a trend to push drugs upon anyone they can find. They will tell you that your kids have adhd, you're girlfriend has a sex disorder, and you should take prescription niacin and not the vitamin?
 
Drug for Sexual Desire Disorder Opposed by Panel

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/19/business/19sexpill.html?src=busln

By DUFF WILSON
Published: June 18, 2010

A federal advisory panel on Friday unanimously voted against recommending approving a drug to treat female sexual desire disorder, but it encouraged the company to continue its research.

That vote by the panel, an adviser to the Food and Drug Administration, followed an F.D.A. staff report earlier this week that also recommended against approval. Such advisory votes do not always influence the F.D.A.’s final decision on a drug, but often they do.

The panel, the Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee, voted against a new drug application by Boehringer Ingelheim, a German pharmaceutical company. Dr. Julia V. Johnson, the panel’s chairwoman, said that the drug’s impact was “not robust enough to justify the risks,” which include dizziness, nausea and fatigue, particularly with long-term daily use.

But Dr. Johnson, head of the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of Massachusetts Medical School, encouraged Boehringer to perform more research. The drug, originally intended as an antidepressant, was meant to elevate sexual desire in premenopausal women who are distressed by diminished libidos.

Another panel member, Dr. Kathleen Hoeger, a reproductive endocrinologist with the University of Rochester Medical Center, said that the research was “incredibly important” but that more work was required to improve long-term safety.

The Boehringer drug, flibanserin, affects brain chemicals, like dopamine and serotonin, thought to be involved with sexual drive.

The F.D.A. staff found that it had effectively increased the number of sexually satisfying events reported by more than 1,000 women with depressed libido, increasing those events by a statistically significant 0.8 per month in randomized, placebo-controlled experiments.

But the staff found the drug had not been proved to increase women’s desire — a crucial element of the diagnosis, which involves low or no sexual interest to the point of distress in otherwise healthy people.

The diagnosis, called hypoactive sexual desire disorder, is itself controversial. In the last month Boehringer has mounted a publicity campaign promoting the disorder, in advance of F.D.A. decision-making.

Dr. Anita H. Clayton, a Boehringer consultant and psychiatry professor at the University of Virginia, said the desire disorder affected 6 to 10 percent of premenopausal women, although that estimate was challenged by several speakers at the advisory committee hearing.

Boehringer will continue its research on the drug, a company official said after the vote.

“We are disappointed with the advisory committee’s recommendations and will work with the F.D.A. to address questions raised,” Dr. Christopher Corsico, Boehringer’s United States medical director, said in a statement.

Earlier this week, the company said it was also working in other countries to gain approval for the drug. Lara Crissey, a spokeswoman, wrote in an e-mail message, “We are in discussions with various regulatory agencies worldwide.”

The panel’s 11-to-0 vote was the second time in six years that an F.D.A. advisory panel had unanimously opposed a drug maker’s attempt to treat the female sexual dysfunction. There is no approved drug for the condition.

Various hormonal therapies have been tried.

The F.D.A. rejected a proposed testosterone patch from Procter & Gamble in 2004. That product was approved in Europe in 2006 for use by women who suffered low libido after removal of their uterus and ovaries, after all other forms of sex therapy failed. The product, Intrinsa, has been widely used by women in England who are not surgically menopausal.

BioSante Pharmaceuticals of Illinois plans to seek F.D.A. approval next year for a testosterone product called LibiGel, its spokesman, Alan Zachary, said Friday.

Some doctors already prescribe hormone therapies in so-called off-label uses. Over 4 million testosterone prescriptions were written for women’s sexual dysfunctions in 2009, although it has not been approved by the F.D.A. for that, said Stephen M. Simes, BioSante’s president.

Sheryl A. Kingsberg, a psychologist, Case Western Reserve University medical professor and prominent industry consultant, said widespread off-label use of hormonal drugs indicated a pent-up demand for pharmaceutical help for women.

Professor Kingsberg said Friday that she was disappointed in the F.D.A. advisory vote because Boehringer’s product would have been the first one on the market for younger women with the sexual desire disorder, treating them without hormones.

“I certainly hope Boehringer doesn’t give up,” she said in a phone interview. “Flibanserin showed an awful lot of promise. I’m going to have some very, very disappointed patients if there’s nothing for them.”

But Amy Allina, program director for the National Women’s Health Network, an advocacy group, said: “For some it may turn out that there is a drug that provides effective treatment. But this drug is not it.”
 
yikes! could put a new angle on date-rape!

you can see it now - he spiked my drink with a drug that made me want to sleep with him, I had no self control! 8o
 
I am not sure if it should be treated as a medicine but should be made available. After all, not being high isn't a disorder but I am sure we all would agree recreational highs should be available
 
Top