• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!
  • MDMA Moderators: Esperighanto

Pure MDMA Vs. Pills

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tweak Thizz

Bluelighter
Joined
Apr 23, 2010
Messages
268
I'm wondering your decision on this cause I recently got a pretty good connect for some Pure MDMA. And also I'm wondering how many MG a regular E pill has.
 
Last edited:
Should edit out your price, and I prefer molly over pressed pills.
From what I'm told pills in socal are 90mg+ but don't quote me on that... I know there are pills in holland that are 170mg+

Nice avatar too, lol.
 
Should edit out your price, and I prefer molly over pressed pills.
From what I'm told pills in socal are 90mg+ but don't quote me on that... I know there are pills in holland that are 170mg+

Nice avatar too, lol.

Lmao thanks :D and I will now.
 
Yeah, a lot of pressed pills aren't mdma alone (assuming they are mdma in the first place), a common cut tends to be caffeine in my area... I'd go with the molly and if you want a bit of a energetic roll, get some caffeine in your system too.
 
If you can get pure MDMA and you know it's pure, then that should be the choice. Pills can have all sorts of adulterants and things cut in them (your 'pure' MDMA can have things cut in it too though..)
 
Yeah, a lot of pressed pills aren't mdma alone (assuming they are mdma in the first place), a common cut tends to be caffeine in my area... I'd go with the molly and if you want a bit of a energetic roll, get some caffeine in your system too.

Yeah, I've personally tried both. There's some pokeballs here as well, (caffeine and ketamine i think) though low doses. The pure MDMA was amazing, felt more clean but didn't last as long. I didn't get much of a comedown either. Though with an E pill it lasts a bit longer and I get a way worse comedown
 
Yeah, I've personally tried both. There's some pokeballs here as well, (caffeine and ketamine i think) though low doses. The pure MDMA was amazing, felt more clean but didn't last as long. I didn't get much of a comedown either. Though with an E pill it lasts a bit longer and I get a way worse comedown

It will last the same amount of time if the pills are clean.
If it's lasting longer it's because of another drug is cut in it.
 
No Consequence is right, if you're taking the same dose of mdma each time and the pressed pills are lasting longer then it's cut with something.
 
Not really, the reason MD will last shorter is because you're body doesn't have to break down the pill binder, it all depends on the pressure and amount of binder that was used to press such pill.

With pure MD, you're getting the ingredient you want straight away.

Try chewing a pill with 120mg. Have a break, and drop 120mg of pure MD with no skin (Just the MD), they'll last around the same. chewing it essentially breaks it and removes the step your stomach does.


I don't get what the fuss is over "pure" MD, it can be cut just as easy I think. In the end, the overall effects are the same. What do you think they put in pills? Some lesser-version of MDMA, it's all MDMA in the end.

Pills in the UK now are purely MDMA I think, no cuts. I haven't had a pill thats been cut with speed or caffeine etc. Just the same as what I'd get buying "pure" MD.
 
That is also true ^. It will last a little shorter if it's powder because you don't have to break up the pill in your stomach.
But I was mainly referring to when some people might say that they rolled for significantly longer. I wasn't referring to the way you consume it. Of course a pill will take longer to hit than powder.
 
There is no chemical difference in a pressed pill that's only active ingredient is MDMA vs. a loose powder in a capsule whose only active ingredient is MDMA- but the common misconception is that "molly" is always better. Powder is by far easier to contaminate, so it's even more essential you test it.

I don't know the facts behind powder form being broken down and "hitting" you vs. a pressed capsule, but I imagine the difference is minimal if at all. Powder can come in all different strengths as well, so I'd be cautious regardless, and of course reagent test it before you consume it.
 
Molly is better...you never really know what's in the pills. Even if they contain real mdma it's not certain that is the only chemical you're ingesting. Get the crystals vs. the powder...like Bsiren said powder is easy to contaminate...but big crystals are about as pure as you can hope for
 
agreed wif girlygrrl
fuck pressed pills, that dont even generally have a proper dose of MDMA in em.
and thats if youre lucky and dont get speed/pipes
OMG 90MG MDMA HIGH I WAS ROWLIN BAWLZ ON 90MG
cracka please.
 
LSDMDMA&9429425 said:
agreed wif girlygrrl
fuck pressed pills, that dont even generally have a proper dose of MDMA in em.
and thats if youre lucky and dont get speed/pipes
OMG 90MG MDMA HIGH I WAS ROWLIN BAWLZ ON 90MG
cracka please.

lololol, +1
 
LSDMDMA&9430220 said:
yeah
right thar, diggity fuckin dank shit
2nd pic is kinda blurry but the first one shows teh rockz
and the first one doesnt want to embed, click the link



It looks like toilet paper and a bag of unknown. wich is exactly my point.

You guys simply need to be testing, and if its unadulterated mdma confirmed with reagents and a good price pressed, powder, mythical crystal who cares atleast you get to enjoy it loads of people dont get too. If it hasnt been personally tested by purchaser i dont recomend anyone take ecstacy of any kind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Molly these days is nearly just as unreliable as pills, and still often cut with sketchy substances. So honestly, either work for me so long as they test reasonably clean.
 
Say you had a pure pressed pill only containing MDMA (say 100mg) and a capsule containing only MDMA (say 100mg). Is there any evidence that can account for any difference in length and intensity of experience?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top