• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!

Pupils dilated but still not feeling anything?

Me and a friend went slightly overboard last weekend, we took 300mg each to start off with (we knew it wouldn't be pure so at best that was 200mg pure)
After like half an hour we still felt NOTHING, we were getting pissed off cause the music was shit too. My friend dropped a 4th 100mg even though I advised him not to. Pretty much right after he dropped it, BAM, we were high as fucking kites, floating, loving everything, and one of our fav djs at the rave dropped his set right when we came up :D
I had my 4th like half an hour after that, and my 5th an hour after that, was rolling hard all night :)
My friend did get a little overwhelmed though cause he took too much too fast. He was feeling pretty shit for about 20 min, couldn't even speak really, I just reassured him everything would be fine and made sure he drank some water at a responsible pace. Look out for your buddies if they roll too hard <3
 
Well, unfortunately I've never rolled before so I can't confirm what I experienced was actually the effects of mdma. It never really "hit me like a ton of bricks" like you guys are describing. It was a different high then I've ever experienced before. My face felt hot and my legs were tingly. Walking around campus, I was thinking about my life in a whole new perspective. My thoughts felt organized and it was like I was solving all my problems in my head. Music was definitely more enjoyable, but I enjoyed certain songs much more than others. When I started having bad thoughts I simply changed the song and everything was right again. It was far from overwhelming however and I constantly felt myself wanting more, wanting to feel higher. I do think that my tolerance to vyvanse had an effect. My theory is that my tolerance to amps combined with the fact that I was coming down from the vyvanse I took earlier in the day kind of put a damper on the whole thing. But I did take nearly half a gram with no prior experience with the substance before, so I'm sure the stuff I had was of poor quality. From everything I've read about the drug, I should've been rolling face.

Another theory I have is that having read copious amounts of information about E and countless other drugs online, I sometimes expect too much out of substances. I feel like reading about peoples experiences planted a certain idea in my head about exactly how I should be feeling when under the influence of any given drug. I think that maybe instead of just rolling (no pun intended) with the high I'm feeling, I try to turn the experience into something it's not and somehow diminish the effects in my head. I felt the same type of thing when I took acid for the first time. I took two hits and although I definitely "tripped", it wasn't the experience I was hoping for. My friends, on the other hand, tripped balls and had an awesome time. Idk it's just frustating. Kind of makes me want to get a strip of acid and a gram of molly and dose until I've lost my sanity and any ability to think rationally.
 
I got it from a trustworthy source otherwise I would've never taken it in the first place. Obviously trustworthy sources aren't foolproof but I'm pretty damn sure it's MDMA.

Oh dear.

There is no such thing as a trustworthy source when it comes to dealing drugs.

And even if he was a tiny bit truistworthy, how do you know his hookup is trustworthy.

Buy and use a test kit so you dont become just another smuck who is sold bunk or worse........something that will kill you.
 
Oh dear.

There is no such thing as a trustworthy source when it comes to dealing drugs.

And even if he was a tiny bit truistworthy, how do you know his hookup is trustworthy.

Buy and use a test kit so you dont become just another smuck who is sold bunk or worse........something that will kill you.

I appreciate the advice/concern, and I am all for caution and harm reduction when it comes to drug use, however I don't see how a test kit guarantees anything. Sure, if the stuff was totally bunk it would help, but in most cases at least a portion of the substance is going to be MDMA. It's the other portion you have to worry about. If I get a bag of molly cut with rat poison, a test kit won't help me any...that is unless I have an incorrect understanding of how test kits work.
 
you kidding?
most molly has MDMA in it?
where are you pulling THAT from?
im pretty sure most molly is relatively pure and a low amount, if any of inactive cut.
im pretty sure people dont cut molly to piss so itll pass a test but do nothing..
thats just a waste of MDMA..
 
I appreciate the advice/concern, and I am all for caution and harm reduction when it comes to drug use, however I don't see how a test kit guarantees anything. Sure, if the stuff was totally bunk it would help, but in most cases at least a portion of the substance is going to be MDMA. It's the other portion you have to worry about. If I get a bag of molly cut with rat poison, a test kit won't help me any...that is unless I have an incorrect understanding of how test kits work.

Who said anything about guarantees? It's called harm reduction and this is a harm reduction forum, your choice buddy.
 
LSDMDMA&8916486 said:
you kidding?
most molly has MDMA in it?
where are you pulling THAT from?
im pretty sure most molly is relatively pure and a low amount, if any of inactive cut.
im pretty sure people dont cut molly to piss so itll pass a test but do nothing..
thats just a waste of MDMA..

Okay, maybe I'm wrong I'm obviously not really experienced with this. I was under the impression that any drugs in powder form (not just molly) are cut with different substances (psychoactive or not) as they make their way down the line from supplier to user. I don't think this is done so that it the substances "pass tests but do nothing" but rather to add weight while still giving the desired effect albeit in a much more subtle and less powerful way than the pure form of the drug would give. The same goes for when you see these pills that while containing a small amount of mdma, they also contain speed or meth in attempt to mimic the effects of rolling by using cheaper drugs to enhance the high. While I'm sure their are people out there who sell substances that look like molly but actually contain no MDMA at all, but I would think that it is far more likely (Especially in a big ten college suburban environment. This isn't exactly the inner city/ghetto where anything goes. Yeah yeah dumb stereotype...it's true get over it.) for people to sell real MDMA that's just been cut to shit with god knows what.
 
LSDMDMA&8916486 said:
you kidding?
most molly has MDMA in it?
where are you pulling THAT from?
im pretty sure most molly is relatively pure and a low amount, if any of inactive cut.
im pretty sure people dont cut molly to piss so itll pass a test but do nothing..
thats just a waste of MDMA..

Okay, maybe I'm wrong I'm obviously not really experienced with this. I was under the impression that any drugs in powder form (not just molly) are cut with different substances (psychoactive or not) as they make their way down the line from supplier to user. I don't think this is done so that it the substances "pass tests but do nothing" but rather to add weight while still giving the desired effect albeit in a much more subtle and less powerful way than the pure form of the drug would give. The same goes for when you see these pills that while containing a small amount of mdma, they also contain speed or meth in attempt to mimic the effects of rolling by using cheaper drugs to enhance the high. While I'm sure their are people out there who sell substances that look like molly but actually contain no MDMA at all, but I would think that it is far more likely (Especially in a big ten college suburban environment. This isn't exactly the inner city/ghetto where anything goes. Yeah yeah dumb stereotype...it's true get over it.) for people to sell real MDMA that's just been cut to shit with god knows what.

Who said anything about guarantees? It's called harm reduction and this is a harm reduction forum, your choice buddy.
I'm not trying to argue against the importance of harm reduction. I just question the actual effectiveness of a test kit in terms of reducing the danger of use. You guys make good points and I can see ways in which a test kit will be helpful. I will be using one in the future even if I know it doesn't guarantee anything, but after this experience and reading everyone's advice I figure it's better safe than sorry.

I appreciate everyone sharing their opinion, and I don't intend to come off as promoting irresponsible usage in any way.
 
I'm not trying to argue against the importance of harm reduction. I just question the actual effectiveness of a test kit in terms of reducing the danger of use. You guys make good points and I can see ways in which a test kit will be helpful. I will be using one in the future even if I know it doesn't guarantee anything, but after this experience and reading everyone's advice I figure it's better safe than sorry.

I appreciate everyone sharing their opinion, and I don't intend to come off as promoting irresponsible usage in any way.

How can one argue against a test kits effectiveness? All it does is tell you if the substance contains MDMA, not how much of it or what's it cut with. It never asserts to do those things either, it's up to you in knowing how to apply those findings.
 
just because its sold as molly doesnt mean shit..ive had "molly" that wasnt MDMA but was still active.
wut you had i doubt was MDMA.
if its not cut to absolute piss .5g shouldve had you completely fucked, not questioning if youre high.
oh wow this is a college town that means its not cut.
yeah right.
mdma is probably one of the MORE cut drugs out there, when do you see people selling meth/amps as coke or shit like that?
never
but lots of times people sell pills that have no MDMA in them as ecstasy.
the name "ecstasy" to describe a drug means nothing really, other than a little pill with a logo on it.
 
Top