ocean said:
Why is this a debate?
I don't understand why every time someone shares a positive experience with a psychic you seem to chime in with a dismissal. You don't have to believe but its a shame you are choosing to try to shut others down with things like
The initial topic of discussion was psychics, skepticism, the possible validity of the psychic method and whether or not a psychic might be able to help the OP's mum. The OP specifically asked the question 'Are they full of shit or not' which i have done my best to answer.
As such it's completely reasonable that some people are going to take one side of the discussion and other people the other side. That is why this is a debate.
My point about psychics trying to help people was relevant if you re-read the original post. n3ophy7e may not have gone seeking this help, but many people do including the OP's mum, and many psychics try and provide this service (either from genuine deluded self belief or because it makes them money). I think this is harmful for the reasons i have given and thus an important point to make.
n3ophy7e said:
You forget to acknowledge the most important part of my encounter which was the fact that for whatever reason this woman said the things that she said, it nudged me in the direction to make a couple of decisions for the better. I was not expecting her to even bring up the things that she did, but for whatever reason she said things that made me deeply contemplate my life and make changes for the better, so please by all means tell me what is wrong with that?
You forget that this doesn't count for much as proof of anything. I think you are not giving yourself enough credit here. I suspect the psychic said a bunch of stuff, some of which stuck because she was good at the game, and then you went away and thought about your life and re-evaluated some stuff and came out a better person for it. I think you are the one that did the hard work and deserves the credit. This is not me shitting on your experience (as you so charmingly put it). This is me offering an alternative scientifically explainable reason for what you experienced without necessarily lessening the value of the experience at all (assuming you value the positive life change I'm arguing that you made for yourself rather than valuing the fact you met a real life psychic). It would be a shame if your hostile response to this point discourage other people with views similar to mine involving themselves in the debate.
n3ophy7e said:
MrM, in my opinion, arguing against people who choose to believe in psychics is exactly the same as arguing against people who choose to believe in any god. Would you shoot down people from any religion the way you are shooting down "believers" in this thread??
Are you saying belief in psychics, mysticism and psychic powers are another area of a persons mind, that like religion, is so fragile and special it cannot stand any criticism? Putting psychics and belief in psychic powers on this kind of untouchable pedistal strikes me as dangerous.
I would indeed debate with religious people in a similar way, if the context was similar. If the subject we were discussion was (for example) infant circumcision, or the politics of the middle east, or condoms in africa, i would be equally critical of religious leaders and religious belief as i am being of psychics when the discussion is around the ability of these people to help someone's mum with life.
These topics are only sacred and off limits to believers who's religion tells them this is the case. If people with such beliefs want to keep people who don't share these beliefs out of the debate then they should not debate in public.