Proof that war on drugs has failed

neversickanymore

Moderator: DS
Staff member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
32,763
Location
babysitting the argument in my head
Proof that war on drugs has failed
Don Curtis
Clinton

Unbelievably, heroin use is on the rise and Snohomish County is one of the areas that have shown a sharp increase in usage. Not as bad as some cities, where the drug use has reached epidemic proportions, but any increase is tragic.

It’s hard to imagine how, in this day and age, considering all of the money spent on trying to educate us, how anyone could become addicted. To heroin especially, but to meth, prescription pain killers, etc. etc.

These drugs are killers. Presently, 100 folks a day die from overdosing and in some cities the number doubles annually. There is no cure, except death, from heroin addiction. It’s either addiction or continual rehab. Marijuana use is nothing compared to this stuff and heroin, in some parts of the country, is as cheap as a 6 pack of beer and cheaper than prescription drugs.

We have lost the “war on drugs." We should help those that need help and those that want to help themselves, but at some point we humans have to start taking care of ourselves, take responsibility and suffer the consequences for our own actions.

A typical example is the Quincy Valley Medical Center, the nearest hospital to the Gorge Amphitheater. They have to add staff on concert weekends to handle drug overdose cases. Concertgoers can afford the expensive tickets and buy more than enough drugs of their choice but they can’t afford the hospital care to treat their overdose. So the local property tax supported hospital has to absorb the cost.

A half a million bucks last year and rising. Millions of dollars, probably billions by now, first for preventative education, then to treat,feed, and house addicts and sometimes their families as well, then to pursue,

prosecute and jail offenders. Recently, we read that drug “camps” in outlying areas are set up, often near food banks for obvious reasons and food stamps have long been used as currency to buy drugs. Were helping a few and enabling many more.

Rehabilitation does work for some, as I said, but with drug use increasing, even in the face of all the evidence showing us how harmful it is, isn’t their a line that should be drawn? If you repeatedly choose to ruin your life, so be it. Like drunk drivers, it seems as if someone has to die before the lawbreaker has to pay a severe enough penalty.

We have been told, for years now, that we don’t have the money to build more prisons. Considering the amount of money already spent, and continue to spend, on this so called “war”, building prisons to separate the offender from society is probably a bargain.

http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20140217/OPINION02/140219211/Proof-that-war-on-drugs-has-failed-
 
It’s hard to imagine how, in this day and age, considering all of the money spent on trying to educate us, how anyone could become addicted. To heroin especially, but to meth, prescription pain killers, etc. etc.
I've read that of all those surveyed who have ever tried heroin, only 1.8 percent have used it in the past month. This suggests that it's not that intrinsically addictive, but rather, those addicted to it have other reasons for returning to it often enough to become physically addicted. This suggests people become heroin addicts to self-medicate or escape sources of suffering in their environment. In any case, the disbelieving attitude expressed by this author does not seem remotely warranted by such considerations, which more than anything else suggests to me he's simply some ignorant presumptuous dick.
 
That's a real striking fact that heroin is cheaper than a six pack. I see no problem with letting people shoot up three-four times per day if my taxes don't go into cleaning up their poisoned bodies.
 
There is no cure, except death, from heroin addiction
Oh really?
Concertgoers can afford the expensive tickets and buy more than enough drugs of their choice but they can’t afford the hospital care to treat their overdose.
When the price of enough illegal drugs to cause overdose is cheaper than treating an overdose (how much can it seriously cost to treat an opiate OD?) there is something really, really wrong with that country's health system, if you ask me.
As much as the headline makes this look like an interesting article, it is pig-ignorant and puts $$$$ above human life.
Cold.
 
I am sick of hearing about the "cost" of treating overdose victims. How much does it actually cost to reverse a typical narcotic overdose? Less than $1. If saving money was the real goal, naloxone would be readily available to everyone.
 
I've read that of all those surveyed who have ever tried heroin, only 1.8 percent have used it in the past month. This suggests that it's not that intrinsically addictive, but rather, those addicted to it have other reasons for returning to it often enough to become physically addicted. This suggests people become heroin addicts to self-medicate or escape sources of suffering in their environment. In any case, the disbelieving attitude expressed by this author does not seem remotely warranted by such considerations, which more than anything else suggests to me he's simply some ignorant presumptuous dick.
+1 psood0nym.. as Carl Heart says "its not the drugs"
 
I've read that of all those surveyed who have ever tried heroin, only 1.8 percent have used it in the past month.

The latest number from the U.S. is actually 7.3%, but of course not all of those 7.3% are addicted. For example, in the latest Australian drug use survey, 60.6% of users of "injectable drugs" used them less than once a week.
 
Am I supposed to feel pity for the hospitals here? Not to diminish the problems that they have, but their responsibility is to take care of people...as bad as festival epicenters are for excessive drug intake, I can't think that the influenza outbreak of 1919 or the polio epidemic didn't similarly cripple local American hospitals with intake capacity and monetary expenses...not to bring up historical analogies out of nowhere, but they'll work in a pinch.
 
Last edited:
which more than anything else suggests to me he's simply some ignorant presumptuous dick.

Word man fuck this author and this article

Alot of great posts in this article.

This is all about the money tonthe government and everybody but those suffering from addiction its Tim we get treated like humans instead of filth because we choose to get high this shit is all so backwards its disgusting.
 
privileged journalist said:
Marijuana use is nothing compared to this stuff...

Thanks for pointing out the fact that you are living in one of two states in the US which has legalized the sale of cannabis for recreational use to adults 21+, because clearly it would have been a bad career move for a journalist from the state of Oklahoma to write such a thing.

That being said, what in the blue fuck do you really know about heroin? Because I'm willing to bet that - based on your entire article - you actually know very little.

inconsiderate journalist said:
It’s hard to imagine how, in this day and age, considering all of the money spent on trying to educate us, how anyone could become addicted.

We live in a society which is based on a 'survival of the fittest' mentality (capitalism); in a society which is very materialistic in nature; in a society in which the gap between the rich and the poor is widening, with the middle-class slowly but surely disappearing, and you have a hard time imagining how some people still end up as addicts?

It sounds like your life has been devoid of any severe chronic emotional and/or physical pain.

Were you constantly bullied at school, only to come home and witness your parents fighting. Was your father a violent drunk who took out his anger on you and your mother?

About around the time you reached your mid-teens, did the decade of constant bullying at school and unprovoked beatings from daddy at home take its toll on you? Were you so miserable at this point in your life that just being in a sober state of mind became intolerable due to the painful memories?

Shortly after you hit your 17th birthday, were you offered some white powder by a fellow student, who, when you asked what it was replied, "oxycotton"?

Did you decide to snort it because you were purely curious, or you were suffering so much that when you heard that "oxycotton makes you feel like a million bucks," you thought to yourself that you've got nothing to lose since you were now always thinking of suicide anyways?

Did the OxyContin powder you snorted make you feel like all your problems, all your pain was gone for good? That this is how you should feel when sober, and that you could handle life if you had oxycodone constantly saturating your mu-opioid receptors?

Did you end up having to use more and more to get the same effect? Did you end up pawning all your possessions to fund your habit? Did you switch to heroin after you found out it's much cheaper? Did you start dealing some to continue to fund your habit? Were you busted and forced to detox in a very uncomfortable cell with no privacy? Were you sentenced to 40 years behind bars by a cunt of a judge?

How's life nowadays? How do you feel about the fact that you tried to escape the pain of your childhood by self-medicating with "illegal narcotics", only to have what freedom you had left taken away from you for the rest of your life because society feels you owe them a 4 decade long debt?

Isn't life so not fair?

Be extremely grateful to whatever god or deity it is you may worship that you are not in this position, as countless other people have been over the past few decades in "the land of the free" and other nations around the world.

arrogant journalist said:
Rehabilitation does work for some, as I said, but with drug use increasing, even in the face of all the evidence showing us how harmful it is, isn’t their a line that should be drawn? If you repeatedly choose to ruin your life, so be it. Like drunk drivers, it seems as if someone has to die before the lawbreaker has to pay a severe enough penalty.

We have been told, for years now, that we don’t have the money to build more prisons. Considering the amount of money already spent, and continue to spend, on this so called “war”, building prisons to separate the offender from society is probably a bargain.

Newsflash: America has ~5% of the world's population, and ~25% of the world's prison population - ~60% of which are in there due to drugs. And you want more of the same for (e.g.) heroin addicts who might not respond to Methadone or Suboxone Maintenance Treatment? What about HAT (Heroin Assisted Treatment)? Too taboo for Uncle Sam?
 
Top