I've used at least a whole lot of cocaine since a few hours hence, and am on the peak of my last rail, which was taken only minutes ago. So if I may seem voluble, verbose, or vapid, I would hardly be surprised.
But it must be noted the question in the OP does not seem to make much sense, at least as I have interpreted it. A sequela of such an outrè, solecistic question is that it precludes any sensible answer, because the coherence and cogency of a given answer cannot usually be greater than that of its question.
So, what is wrong with the question and why do I find it odd or insuperable? Well, my objection is nuanced and sort of complicated to explain, so pardon me if I come across inaccessible or recondite.
The question asks if one finds sexually attractive a salacious, wanton girl (or, taken from a different perspective, if one finds promiscuity, rather than the female practicing it, sexually attractive).
The problem is in the assumption that sexual attractiveness is not a vital requirement for a woman to ever achieve a sufficient quantity of sex partners to qualify as promiscuous. In reality, a sloven gorgon or a repugnant harridan, however libidinous and horny they may veritably be, are not likely to ever entice enough males required to be promiscuous, insofar as promiscuity is defined as immoderate sexual activity and not as simply immoderate sexual reverie or desire.
However, a zaftig coquette or pulchritudinous femme fatale may not even need to be sexually unrestrained and lascivious to be considered promiscuous (i.e., to have an extensive sexual history or high sexual partner-to-age ratio.) Her considerably greater population of male suitors gives her a concomitantly greater population of potential mates and a higher level of sexual opportunity than a beastly beldam, sordid slattern, or tatterdemalion termagent would ever realistically attain or rival.
In conclusion, the degree to which a female is able to be promiscuous is directly proportional to the degree to which she is perceived attractive by males. And the degree to which she is able to be promiscuous determines the degree to which she is likely to be promiscuous—that is, the greater the opportunity, the greater the likelihood of taking it.
To be necessitates the ability to be. And the probability of being is a corollary of the extent of the ability to be.
Therefore, the quintessential promiscuous woman is likely to be as unchaste as she is arousing, for without the condition of the latter how could we have the instance of the former?
And so the most popular, sincere answer among this thread's set of respondents will assuredly be that promiscuous women are attractive. This presumably obviates any further discussion on the attractiveness of sluts, as the truth value thereof has herein been thoroughly established.