No one was talking about them being gabapentinoids ffs. The closest we got was when
@canadianpeduser claimed that they are gabaergic because they are structurally related to GABA (in this case, gabapentinoids to be specific. These drugs bind the the receptor site you described NOT GABA RECEPTORS!!!!!!! I REALLY DON'T KNOW HOW TO BE MORE CLEAR SO I AM USING ALL CAPS!!!)
Don't intrude on a conversation which you haven't the slightest clue about. I was explaining very clearly to them the difference between a structural analog and a functional analog (a concept which STILL seems to elude you somehow; and yet you give me attitude?) The person said its gabaergic; its not, its structurally similar to GABA though which you clearly love repeating time and time again after I already said they were.
Edit: sorry, I lost my temper. I fucking hate repeating myself in 10 different ways for multiple people to STILL not understand me, and even try to challenge me in this case. If you don't understand pharmacology, just keep quiet. Please. The shit gets old fast.