Pot Legalization Could Save U.S. $13.7 Billion Per Year, 300 Economists Say

Unbreakable

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 22, 2009
Messages
5,415
Location
My own little world
====================================================================================================

Pot Legalization Could Save U.S. $13.7 Billion Per Year, 300 Economists Say

Date: Tuesday, 28-Aug-2012 16:23:17



More than 300 economists, including three nobel laureates, have signed a petition calling attention to the findings of a paper by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron, which suggests that if the government legalized marijuana it would save $7.7 billion annually by not having to enforce the current prohibition on the drug. The report added that legalization would save an additional $6 billion per year if the government taxed marijuana at rates similar to alcohol and tobacco.

That’s as much as $13.7 billion per year, but it’s still minimal when compared to the federal deficit, which hit $1.5 trillion last year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

While the economists don’t directly call for pot legalization, the petition asks advocates on both sides to engage in an “open and honest debate” about the benefits of pot prohibition.

“At a minimum, this debate will force advocates of current policy to show that prohibition has benefits sufficient to justify the cost to taxpayers, foregone tax revenues, and numerous ancillary consequences that result from marijuana prohibition,” the petition states.

The economic benefits of pushing pot into mainstream commerce have long been cited as a reason to make the drug legal, and the economists’ petition comes as government officials at both the federal and local levels are looking for ways to raise funds. The majority of Americans say they prefer cutting programs to increasing taxes as a way to deal with the nation’s budget deficit — marijuana legalization would seemingly give the government money without doing either.

Officials in one state have already made the economic argument for pot legalization, but to no avail. California Democratic State Assemblyman Tom Ammiano proposed legislation in 2009 to legalize marijuana in California, arguing that it would yield billions of dollars in tax revenue for a state in dire need of funds. California voters ultimately knocked down a referendum to legalize marijuana in 2010.

Economist Stephen Easton wrote in Businessweek that the financial benefits of pot legalization may be even bigger than Miron’s findings estimate. Based on the amount of money he thinks it would take to produce and market legal marijuana, combined with an estimate of marijuana consumers, Eatson guesses that legalizing the drug could bring in $45 to $100 billion per year. Easton’s name doesn’t appear on the petition.

Some argue that the economic argument for pot legalization is already proven by the benefits states and cities have reaped from making medical marijuana legal. Advocates for Colorado’s medical marijuana industry argue that legalization has helped to jumpstart a stalled economy in cities like Boulder and Denver, according to nj.com.

HuffPost Live will be taking a comprehensive look at America’s failed war on drugs August 28th and September 4th from 12-4 pm ET and 6-10 pm ET. Click here to check it out — and join the conversation.

Source:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/17/economists-marijuana-legalization_n_1431840.html
 
More than 300 economists, including three nobel laureates, have signed a petition calling attention to the findings of a paper by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron, which suggests that if the government legalized marijuana it would save $7.7 billion annually by not having to enforce the current prohibition on the drug. The report added that legalization would save an additional $6 billion per year if the government taxed marijuana at rates similar to alcohol and tobacco.

It just seems like common sense on so many levels, it's pretty fucked how nowhere is doing this afaik? People who don't like it wouldn't have to buy it or go near it, same as with alcohol or tobacco. I can't work out why countries dont do this and make the huge profits from the tax and stop wasting money on enforcing the prohibition of pot.
 
^ Because it is not illegal based on any economic factors - other than protecting the interests of other large industries.
Cannabis is illegal primarily for religious/cult-fanatic reasons (and those industries' interests).
An illegal plant?!?
Come on. Something is very fishy about that.
 
man i dislike religion...

Wouldn't there be some opportunities for some large industries to get involved tho? Marketing, production. And doesn't the governments wont the tax anyway even if there is opposition from religious fanatics and sects / cults etc? Religion and cults arent that big here, well not like America anyway.
 
Now I'm not arguing against marijuana legalization but 1000s of jobs will be lost when it does becoming legal and I think that is a big part of it. Sure it will create jobs but think about it.

Basically every job in the legal field will lose a lot of workers.

There will be less need for police officers, though that will be the field that loses the least. There will be fewer probation officers, lawyers, public defenders, those who look for drugs and those who defend process and assist users will take a hit.

Again I am not speaking for it to be legal I'm merely saying that jobs will be lost. Those most likely to lose there jobs are people who might not have a skill set to get a better job. I really don't think the oil companies and those who profit the greatest off it being illegal will suffer but rather those who found a nitch in a system that ended up producing a field that pays well to those in it. Imagine if your mother or someone you love is a probation officer and suddenly it's legal and she loses 75% of her case load and now has to deal with more violent people who are not cooroperative?

Just something to consider. Remember I am for legalization.
 
^ What you are saying makes perfect sense.
As with any corrupt system, changing to something less corrupt will disrupt the workings of the system.
There will be some jobs lost, some careers ruined (e.g. DEA agents who are famous for many large cannabis busts might no longer get the same respect).
This is the cost of changing systems.

However, the price of not changing systems is far, far greater.
Millions of lives ruined in the U.S. alone by convictions for possession.
Support of terrorist gangs.
More people drink alcohol and use tobacco, which are far more damaging (both individually and societally) than cannabis, because they are legal, and cannabis is not.
Making kids deal with criminals in order to buy weed, which gets them to become friendly with criminals, and more used to criminals...
Making kids/people lose trust for the government and police, once they find out that smoking weed is far less dangerous than their education told them.
etc. etc.
 
^ very true. I am all for legalization and I think that these are the steps required for a great change in the system, I just want people to see its the common family that stands to lose the most in these "revolutions" I feel a gradual reduction in its illegal status will be key. We can not have a massive system change over night or it will produce chaos.

Over all the amount of jobs lost and lives ruined because of leglization will be less the those due to probition. It just really needs to happen slowly and prepared for. I think this is one of the reasons it has not happened yet.
 
Top