gayorstraight
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2012
- Messages
- 2,372
I believe you're referring to the 50 shades of grey effect there Shammy
Yup. Pr0n peeps are notoriously fukked up. Can be a nasty ol' bizniz. Would help if the more legit, "classy" end of the pr0n industry wasn't also godawful. Sad fact is that it's often the sleazier end that makes better grot. Have noticed that "female friendly" pr0n is becoming pretty popular recently. Not that that term really means much but much of it is looks a lot less manky than the usual. Actually seen some properly classy pr0n that also highly wankable recently. Get the feeling there may be a bit of a backlash against all that cheapo, repetitive, cookie-cutter, mostly pretty frikkin shabby "gonzo" stuff. More women directors, better production values, presumably better working conditions for performers. But yeah, we all know the realities of the pr0n industry often ain't pretty. Am a boy though and thus lazy so why use my imagination when I can use my eyes?
That aside, what do pubes lodged at the back of the throat have to do with pr0n or promiscuity? I'm rather fond of the former and always have been. The whole topic of pornography actually. Wanking is also great though. Never been one for promiscuity, personally. Nor pubes.
I believe you're referring to the 50 shades of grey effect there Shammy
Except for the line about pubes and promiscuity... surely the two go together....ever heard of oral sex!?
I believe you're referring to the 50 shades of grey effect there Shammy
Shitey, second-rate, BDSM-tinged potboilers produce higher quality pr0n? How does that work out?![]()
Yes I have heard of oral sex... but what does oral sex have to do with promiscuity?![]()
maybe more related to this in terms of reasons, Shammy? More women are making it.
David Cameron wants to ban adult porn?
Fine, I don't watch that genre anyway.
Shambles said:^ No. Cos you can have oral sex with somebody you're married to
Shambles said:Plus, premarital sex is not immoral - that's just fukkin moronic.
Yes I have heard of oral sex... but what does oral sex have to do with promiscuity?
Shitey, second-rate, BDSM-tinged potboilers produce higher quality pr0n? How does that work out?
How did the pr0n thread become so very confusing?!?![]()
Yeah, it's more egoistic based than the love and compassion of marital sex.
So it's still a form of sex then.
Yeah, it's more egoistic based than the love and compassion of marital sex.
Do you not watch This Morning?? Obviously more women are watching porn because of this book! Fact. That's why there's more "female friendly" porn around. Obviously. Jeez, don't you know anything??
Shambles said:In what sense is premarital sex egotistic? You seriously trying to tell me that nobody who isn't married feels love or compassion for their partner?!? Frankly, the reverse is probably more often the case. But, in all honesty, one's marital status has precisely fuck all to do with whether or not you love or feel compassion for somebody you have sex with. I've been with my lil ladyfriend for over a decade now - that's longer than my mother's last marriage. It's been a far happier relationship too. Marriage would have been totally inappropriate. You literally have no idea what you are talking about.
lawdy. limited thought processes or whut?
What about people who are together for long periods of time, say longer than the average marriage lasts, is the sex still more egotistical then?
No much more complicated than that.
I'd explain it better if I wasn't on the Gin and juice again.
meh, fuck the red text was pissing everyone off. How about White?
I think relationships have an orientation. The reasons for this orientation are not always good. Sometimes the desires are animalistic, or perhaps egoistic. We make the mistake of confusing the physical body with the actual person. This discriminative route taps in touch with more animalistic desires.
I guess, I feel, true love is beyond this and about care.... I believe marriage is a confirmation of this, and an outlet for compassionate desires...so therefore I see promiscuous sex as more immoral and void of care.
Ermm yeah, second this.Thanks for putting that in white, Raas. Have never read such utter drivel in all my life and had to make an effort to read it. For a start it simply makes no sense - you seem to be using words in a distinctly non-standard way which makes it hard to know what you are actually trying to say. The bits I can make out are just pure nonsense. And frankly insulting. You really think you can stand in judgement over all unmarried people in relationships and tell them they are "animalistic"? That it's all about sex? Fuck you.
That didn't answer my question tho. I understand all you wrote however.
So, again, what about people who are still together in a (common law) relationship, longer than the average marriage actually lasts, do you just automatically assume their 'orientation' is a negative one, based on ego, and that their sex is less caring and compassionate than those who are married?
I third it. I deeply love the girl I'm having sex with to but according you it's just animalistic fucking because we can't get married yet, but I guess, when she turns 16 in a few years and we eventually get married, the relationship is consummated and all is okay? Fuck you.