AcidTrippin
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2013
- Messages
- 197
Edit
Last edited:
I very strongly believe that batches can have variance and it certainly DOES make sense from a pharmalogical stand point if you consider the possibilities that that we do not know about the combined activity of LSD breakdown products. The only argument that's ever thrown against what I'm saying is that ISO-LSD and other breakdown products are inactive.
I say so what to that... How do we know they don't show activity in the presence of actual LSD thus qualitatively changing the experience? Mescaline cactus has other sympathomimetic chemicals that are inactive on their own but potentiate mescaline.
I've had such varying experiences on different batches - that has been tested.
I've had some acid that was purely tactile - and that was before I ever tried Ecstacy. You all can think what you want. I have my suspicions and I feel their MORE than justified.
But why go to the trouble of making the (usually) harder to make analogues and sell them as LSD? AL-LAD and LSZ proved there's a market for lysargemide RCs.You're missing one option! I believe most LSD is just LSD, at varying purities which don't have any bearing what so ever on it's effects. But once in a blue moon LSD analogs will make the rounds as LSD. Either due to easier acces of precursors or maybe just because they can.
LSM-775 has once been found in European blotters, as well as another mystery ergoloid as seen in this thread. Possibly LSP or LSB.
Why it's not sell it as an RC if it's legal? Because the origin still is an illegal LSD lab. And because your ordinary acid head never heard of the analogs, and they'll be wary of something they never heard of called LSM-775 or what ever. Most ordinary trippers just want LSD.
I know it's a controversial view, but ask yourself this, how much black market LSD is really tested with anything more than an Erhlich? I'd say 1% tops.
Yeah, as people already point out, options B and C doesn't make any sense what so ever.
Good luck with the can of worms you just opened![]()
You don't take into account degradation at all. LSD is not a stable chemical by any means. You might handle it religiously but it's very likely the people who had it before you did not.
Except the problem with that is those chemicals in the cactus which you say are "inactive" are inactive in the sense of effects felt at low doses not in the sense of affinity for receptors these are two separate things. ISO LSD has been tested by David Nichols to have 0 receptor affinity whatsoever so no your comparison is not the same.I very strongly believe that batches can have variance and it certainly DOES make sense from a pharmalogical stand point if you consider the possibilities that that we do not know about the combined activity of LSD breakdown products. The only argument that's ever thrown against what I'm saying is that ISO-LSD and other breakdown products are inactive.
I say so what to that... How do we know they don't show activity in the presence of actual LSD thus qualitatively changing the experience? Mescaline cactus has other sympathomimetic chemicals that are inactive on their own but potentiate mescaline.
I've had such varying experiences on different batches - that has been tested.
I've had some acid that was purely tactile - and that was before I ever tried Ecstacy. You all can think what you want. I have my suspicions and I feel their MORE than justified.
Simply put no. The degredation products show no receptor affinity.But why go to the trouble of making the (usually) harder to make analogues and sell them as LSD? AL-LAD and LSZ proved there's a market for lysargemide RCs.
As to the op I believe that LSD is LSD, but the inactive remnants from the synth and degradation products may not be as inactive as usually claimed and affect the experience.
Which contaminants do appear depends on whether the starting material was ergot, ergotamine tartate or morning-glory seeds. And once these proper precursors have been synthesized into LSD, various isomers and lumi-LSD (LSD saturated with water) may contaminate the final product if not removed by proper chromatographic procedures.
...
There is a great deal of superstition regarding purification of psychedelics. Actually, any impurities which may be present as a result of synthetic procedures will almost certainly be without any effect on the trip.
...
If there are 200 micrograms of impurities present... and few compounds will produce a significant effect until a hundred to a thousand times this amount has been ingested. Even mescaline, which has a rather specific psychedelic effect, requires about a thousand times this amount.
Isomers of LSD are another possible contaminant and indeed are reported present by the drug analysis groups. There are four possible isomers of LSD, but only the d-lysergic acid diethyl amide form is active. The other rotation forms - l-lysergic acid diethyl amide, d and l iso-lysergic acid diethyl amide (contrary to recent reports!) - are inactive. they have no pharmacological role, except possibly as a catalyst for some latent effect of LSD, or to block the action of LSD at the receptor site.
Never noticed that folley - I've had acid in blotter form for at least 3 years and it's as active now as it was 3 years ago. And that's just storing it at room temp.
My thoughts exactly, these threads always turn into 'the battle of pure speculation' and constant debate.Not this again, please check this thread / unfinished FAQ:
http://www.bluelight.org/vb/threads/683253-Dirty-Acid-FAQ-amp-Discussion
I actually added the poll you requested to that FAQ thread, if you have no objections I will proceed with merging this thread into that one.
Sorry but I'm not going to distinguish between your options B and C, that would be the next chapter in this shitstorm of a neverending debate.
No, I don't think they are harder to make than LSD proper. And some of the precursors can be easier to get, because ethylamide is just as scheduled worldwide as LSD is. Acually I don't think Shulgins lysergamides have been made before, I'm thinking more some of Hoffmans. Ethylpropyl for instance, MIPLA, LSM etc etcBut why go to the trouble of making the (usually) harder to make analogues and sell them as LSD? AL-LAD and LSZ proved there's a market for lysargemide RCs.