Police Informant's Death Brings New Law, Lawsuit

trainwreckmolly

Bluelighter
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
4,890
Location
Virginia Beach
December 26, 2008
Police Informant's Death Brings New Law, Lawsuit
Botched Drug Sting Could Mean New Rules for Police

http://www.abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6518730&page=1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The murder of a 23-year-old Florida woman in a botched drug buy-bust operation this May could lead to changes in how confidential informants are recruited and used by the state's law enforcement.

An official investigation found the Tallahassee Police Department had violated its own rules by recruiting Rachel Hoffman, a Florida State University graduate who was facing a drug charge and likely jail time after arrests for marijuana possession, and sending her alone into a dangerous undercover sting without training.

Florida state legislators are putting the finishing touches on a bill they are calling "Rachel's Law," which would tighten up rules on how the state's police recruit and use confidential informants. The law, which was first proposed by Rachel's father, Irv Hoffman, would require police in Florida to be more judicious in their selection of confidential informants and ensure the potential recruit has access to a lawyer.

Its likely sponsors, State Sen. Mike Fasano and State Rep. Peter Nehr, expect the bill to be considered when the legislature begins its regular session next spring. Both are Republican.

Tallahassee Police Chief Dennis Jones has signed on as a supporter of the effort. "We need to do a better job with this," Jones said in September.

Jones' support was perhaps surprising. In the days after Hoffman's murder, Jones made public statements that Hoffman was a criminal who bore a large part of the blame for the botched sting and, by extension, her own death.

"I'm calling her a criminal," Jones told ABC News' Brian Ross in July. Jones said then that he did not accept that his department was in any way responsible for Hoffman's death. "Do we feel responsible? We're responsible for the safety of this community," he said.

Jones, who was reprimanded as a result of the investigation into Hoffman's murder, later apologized for those comments. "We were placing most of the blame on Rachel Hoffman. I regret that now," Jones said. "It made us look like we weren't taking responsibility for what happened."

The two men Hoffman met as part of the May sting are in jail awaiting trial for her murder. One defendant, Andrea Green, has pled not guilty. The other, Deneilo Bradshaw, has not yet entered a plea, according to the court cleark's office.

Hoffman's parents are poised to sue the city of Tallahassee at the end of the month, according to their lawyer, Lance Block. The city has requested the family delay filing suit in order to negotiate a possible settlement out of court. Block said they are not inclined to hold up the suit.

Meanwhile, the only Tallahassee policeman fired over Hoffman's death wants to know why he was fired when higher-ups received only verbal reprimands – even if, like Deputy Police Chief John Proctor – they had approved his plan for the ill-fated operation.

Ryan Pender, who recruited Hoffman and planned the sting operation that went awry, is pushing to get his old job back, insisting that "the operational plan he put together was by the book, by the way he was trained. . . the way he and others in vice had done it for years," his lawyer, Paul Villaneuve, told ABCNews.com.

Tallahassee Police Department spokesman David McCranie said that Chief Jones "looked at the overall picture of everything that occurred and assigned responsibility based on the level of participation by each member of the department."

A spokesman for the police department declined comment on the matter, saying it was a question for the chief of police, who was "not in the building."
 
i remember hearing about this when it first happened. those fucking pigs told her to go into the house and buy something like 1000 E pills, an ounce of crack, and a 9mm. Of course the dealers shot her, did you see her picture? girls like that don't randomly buy an ounce of crack and a handgun.
 
wow i can imagine she got busted with a little bit of pot was thrown in the car told to bust these people wired up got discovered got murdered 100% the cops fault but i think they were right to place all of the blame on the scumbag pig who set the whole thing up. "its how we've been doing it on vice fore years" what scooping up college girls and putting their lives at risk by having them go undercover and buy 1000 rolls and an ounce of crack what the fuck is wrong with these fucking pigs he actually has the fucking nerve to try to get his job back too. sad thing is he probably will
 
Whether she was an informant or not, this is really fucked up. I remember reading this too when it first came out as well. Very unfortunate.
 
fuck changing the states law, make this national. She isnt the first and wont be the last, its fucking sad...
 
Thats crazy how can they bust her for pot and than have her buy hard drugs . She must have told them about the dealer , she probably gave them this guy so I see it as her own stupidity.
 
She's a young female. Imagine how much pressure they put on her. They probably threatened the shit out of her (even it was with lies) about what her maximum punishment could be. I agree it should be national law, it's not like this only happens in Florida.
 
Thats crazy how can they bust her for pot and than have her buy hard drugs . She must have told them about the dealer , she probably gave them this guy so I see it as her own stupidity.

well not everyone can take the pressure of 2 or 3 psychotic power hungry guys with guns threatening to lock you in a cage for a few years if you dont tell them everything that they want to know and do everything they want you to even if she did give the name up it shouldnt "be seen as her own stupidity" not everyone is street tough and can just tell the cops to go fuck themselves were brought up in a society where we are supposed to follow EVERY COMMAND that those pyschopaths with a badge tell us to do. So THE FUCKING PIG SHITS WHO MADE YES MADE HER DO THIS ARE 1000000034839084% RESPONSIBLE FOR HER DEATH. and if they bust her with pot and have any suspiscion that they can get her to go buy harder stuff of fucking course there gonna do it they do not give a shit about her safety they just want more people in cages.
 
Last edited:
This is absolutely shocking. Brings whole new meaning to marijuana being coined a "gateway" drug, yeah gateway to police using you as a PAWN. Every cop who had shit to do with this should be fired and face charges to varying degrees.
Its ridiculous how people get roped into this shit, nobody should be allowed in on undercover operations, stings, buy busts, erc. except trained police!
They are the ones trained for this shit but they are hiding behind a desk and getting young women to go do their dirty work! Shows how much balls they really have!
 
No matter what legislation is passed, corrupt, lazy, pompous, know-it-all cops will continue to intimidate drug users.

Another scape goat for society.

Anyone ever read Mary Shelley's Frankenstein?

There is the answer.

We allow jurisdiction to infringe upon society to "protect", but what can you do if these institutions that are here to serve and protect do not fulfill the above contract?

Isn't it in everyones prayers to be protected from our own government?

Why do we only care when someone dies?

Extremism dissolves society and only rages continuous fear based intimidation.
 
she didnt deserve to die. She also knew exactly what she was doing...setting someone else up with a Fed. case so she can get out of her little piss-ant pot possession charge.
If she didnt understand going into a crack house to purchase guns & dope is more dangerous than going to jail for a few hours , shes a fucking moron.

I hate to say it but as long as drug prohibition continues , snitches will keep getting tossed into ditches.....
 
Ah, she wasn't facing small time or any "little piss-ant pot possession charge." Practice yer reading skills and know what you're talking about before you put your fingers to the keyboard.

Hoffman was facing charges of possession of ecstasy with intent to sell, possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell, maintaining a drug house and possession of drug paraphernalia, Police Chief Dennis Jones said.
 
This story is sickening. This insane war on drugs is a senseless assault against the very people the war is supposed to protect. The Drug war accomplishes NONE of its stated goals and only makes the problems worse. How many decades does a policy have to fail before it is scrapped?
 
2. ?cant seem to find that sentence?

1. But even so that totally excuses her yellow-bellied ratting..... 8)

1. Whether it excuses it or not is irrelevant, what is relevant is an idiot making up claims for no reason.

2. Yeah, that's the funny thing: when an article doesn't discuss something, the right thing to do is to take 60 seconds and figure out what really happened, not to just make up answers because they fit your preconceived notions.
 
1. Whether it excuses it or not is irrelevant, what is relevant is an idiot making up claims for no reason.

2. Yeah, that's the funny thing: when an article doesn't discuss something, the right thing to do is to take 60 seconds and figure out what really happened, not to just make up answers because they fit your preconceived notions.

1. i have no idea what youre talking about. You already quoted a sentence that wasnt even in the article & didnt even give a source.

2. What preconceived notions? She was a snitch who made a deal with the cops , went into a dope house to inform on her suppliers , hook them up with a bigger case & wiggle her slimy ass out of trouble......

to tell you the truth.. i dont feel very sorry for her....
 
No offense to rachel but this only adds credibility to the ancient(but forever wise) proverb: "Snitches get Ditches"


Police caught Hoffman with pot but promised to drop charges if she agreed to go undercover in a drug bust. She was killed soon afterward.
Rachel Hoffman is dead. Rachel Hoffman, like many young adults, occasionally smoked marijuana.

But Rachel Hoffman is not dead as a result of smoking marijuana; she is dead as a result of marijuana prohibition.

Under prohibition, Rachel faced up to five years in a Florida prison for possessing a small amount of marijuana. (Under state law, violators face up to a $5,000 fine and five years in prison for possession of more than 20 grams of pot.)

Under prohibition, the police in Rachel's community viewed the 23-year-old recent college graduate as nothing more than a criminal and threatened her with jail time unless she cooperated with them as an untrained, unsupervised confidential informant. Her assignment: Meet with two men she'd never met and purchase a large quantity of cocaine, ecstasy and a handgun. Rachel rendezvoused with the two men; they shot and killed her.

Under prohibition, the law enforcement officers responsible for brazenly and arrogantly placing Rachel in harm's way have failed to publicly express any remorse -- because, after all, under prohibition Rachel Hoffman was no longer a human being deserving of such sympathies.

Speaking on camera to ABC News' "20/20" last week, Tallahassee Police Chief Dennis Jones attempted to justify his department's callous and irresponsible behavior, stating, "My job as a police chief is to find these criminals in our community and to take them off the streets (and) to make the proper arrest."

But in Rachel Hoffman's case, she was not taken "off the streets," and police made no such arrest -- probably because, deep down, even they know that people like Rachel pose no imminent threat to the public. Instead, the officers on the scene secretly cut a deal with Rachel: They told her that they would not file charges if she agreed to go undercover.

Rachel became the bait; the Tallahassee police force went trolling for sharks.

In the weeks preceding Rachel's murder, police told her to remain tight-lipped about their backroom agreement -- and with good reason. The cops' on-the-spot deal with Rachel flagrantly violated Tallahassee Police Department protocol, which mandated that such an arrangement must first gain formal approval from the state prosecutor's office. Knowing that the office would likely not sign off on their deal -- Rachel was already enrolled in a drug court program from a prior pot possession charge, and cooperating with the TPD as a drug informant would be in violation of her probation -- the police simply decided to move forward with their informal arrangement and not tell anybody.

"(In) hindsight, would it have been a good idea to let the state attorney know? Yes," Jones feebly told "20/20." Damn right it would have been; Rachel Hoffman would still be alive.

But don't expect Jones or any of the other officers who violated the department's code of conduct -- violations that resulted in the death of another human being -- to face repercussions for their actions. Obeying the rules is merely "a good idea" for those assigned with enforcing them. On the other hand, for people like Rachel, violating those rules can be a death sentence.

Of course, to those of us who work in marijuana law reform, we witness firsthand every day the adverse consequences wrought by marijuana prohibition -- a policy that has led to the arrest of nearly 10 million young people since 1990. To us, the sad tale of Rachel Hoffman marks neither the beginning nor the end of our ongoing efforts to bring needed "reefer sanity" to America's criminal justice system. It is simply another chapter in the ongoing and tragic saga that is marijuana prohibition.
~ link
 
this is a sad story

HOWEVER

snitches get stitches and end up in ditches.

I don't feel sorry for any snitches ever. Sorry... thats how the game plays out in my mind.
 
Top