Hey redleader, what modern artists in particular are you thinking of?
My ex-girlfriend stands out

She's an artist by trade, has been for several years now, and she totally does this.
Okay, I'll keep her privacy respected as well as I can, but this occured with her right before we broke up. Years ago, she was finishing up her undergrad studio art degree, and was paniced as she felt unable to submit her "final project" at a level which would earn her a top mark.
It basically went like this:
Ex: I mean I have all of these ideas in my mind. Colours and shapes I want to put into form, but I just don't know how to write about it in the complementary paper required.
Redleader (as a sucker): Don't worry about that, just do your thing and we can deal with the paper later.
Ex: Thanks, sweetie.
::time passes::
Redleader: Okay, so I see you've spent the past week working really hard on this creation.
What the fuck is that? Do you have any ideas what you think it means? I mean, just to help us start working on your paper?
Ex: Well definately about sceince. And about how scientific thought and art can clash.
Redleader: Okay. Hmm how about
anonymous political topic where science and art do clash.
Ex: Wow ya, I get ya.
Redleader: blah, blah, blah
Ex: Like, I didn't realise this before, but totally. You hit the nail on the head.
Redleader:
I feel like I just threw a hammer at a bed of nails... Okay, sweetie, that it is. Let's go to the computer lab.
::time passes::
Redleader (the sucker): Okay there, I just wrote you a beautiful theory. Of course I spent hours and hours teaching myself new themes about
such political topic, while you just threw random jibberish on a canvas, alas...
Ex: It's like....I felt that inside, but I didn't know how to put it into words.
Redleader:
Of course not, you didn't take the time to educate yourself about the topic of choice, not that you had one in the first place even,...
::we break up shortly thereafter::
She got a great mark on the paper, and went on to use the theory which I largely had developed when she described her work hung in various art shows. The work sold for an amount which I won't say, but honestly...


It's not famous modern artists I am necessarily attacking (Jackson Pollock IS one, though. Don't even get me started...). It's more the ones who are trying to make it, but don't have the research ability to really unite their work with a strong and well-expressed message. I see it a lot in local art shows/festivals - an artist puts up a bunch of "visual jibberish," has a bunch of wine and cheese at a small-time function where such work is displayed, and then rips ideas off from intellectual/academic types that talk at said show.
Low-level modern artist: Welcome to my....shhsshhow. The wine's free!"
Redleader (trying to impress date): Well if I were to write a paper about this, I'd probablly make up some bullshit about
fill in the topic.
Date (trying to impress Redleader): Well if I were to be in the same class, but that one over there instead was mine, well my paper would be about
fill in the topic.
::time passes::
Low and behold, the artist goes on to steal our random jibberish, add a few of his personalised descriptive words into the mix, and exponentially increase the selling potential of his work.
*note again, as I said above, I am not attacking all modern artists. Just some.