• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: andyturbo

Perth Pills 29/01/01

Thanks entropope and robo-t for your explanations. I feel compelled to reply to the personal attacks from the people who feel maligned by my deletion of their posts...
Just a quick clarification for those who thought I overreacted. There was one (1) post containing pill information when I read this thread the first time, and it also contained information that could be construed as using Bluelight to organise deals. There was 1 reply at the time, from Robo-t saying "Naughty Boy". So that's a grand total of 2 posts in the thread, which after I'd removed the offending information, basically had a little info about some pills and messages saying "dont deal here". Now, by the time I'd managed to wrestle my slow arse computer into editing the post and tidying up the first transgression, a further post had been added which had reference to the earlier deal information, and I thought "FUCK THIS - it will take only marginally longer for the posters to retype their pill info than it would for the CIB to kick their doors in and arrest them for trafficking narcotics, so I'll just delete the whole thing to protect them both."
Don't take it personally when your posts get deleted, it's not a personal attack. Moderators only rarely delete posts, mostly edit them. But I ask you, how good does a Perth Pills thread look when 3 out of 3 posts contain either warnings not to deal online, or moderator edits removing material that contravenes the Bluelight rules? I don't delete this shit for my own amusement, I do it for the benefit of Bluelight (and you).
By the way, I realise that the people concerned weren't really trying to "deal" on here, but caution is advised - this is a PUBLIC forum - and if there is ANY doubt that what you're about to post might be misinterpreted as intent to traffic illegal substances, then THINK AGAIN before you press "submit".
If anyone wishes to discuss this issue further, please email me, my email address is in the little envelope icon at the top of this post.
BigTrancer.
------------------
Load universe into cannon. Aim at brain. Shoot.
 
TesTed the RUSH. very fast purple/black. nice pill wouldnt bother tking half/half. wholes are better at once. nice cruisy rushy -as much as i hate to say, "cokey" or chargy type pill. wouldnt be surprised if the were pma...no real come down
------------------
" Role to tha EKS! "
<-H1ghR0ll3r->
 
Bigtrancer - This will be my last comment on the issue, 1. because I dont like to whinge or hold grudges unless there is a good reason 2. because apart from the event transpiring in this thread, its not applicable to the topic.
I just want to clarify this. In the original post wizze kid said something to the effect of xxxxx. In terms of legality, how is this different from saying "At vibes, I consumed 2 JA's." xxxxx Whereas within these pages, every day hundreds of people say stuff like "I consumed x many pills of this description at this event." Isnt that far more illigal than a reference to somethign that didnt happen?
Thanks for 'protecting' me from myself, in future its the kind of protection i think i'll choose to do without. Entropope you said that the mods are human, but we shouldnt abuse them. A forum such as bluelight can only operate with a balance of moderator/user interaction. If we arent aloud to criticise what goes on, and every action by the mods is catagorized under 'protetion' or 'for our own good', then who is this benifitting?
BT: you said it would only take marginally longer for me to retype my post? That original post had only one line of what you called incriminating evidence, followed by detailed perth pill reporting which was unrelated to the dealing matter. It took me over half an hour to write. As far as im concerned, what you originally did with wizze's post, editing out the 'dealing' bit would have been fair and just had it been applied to the thread, but as a result of your strong-arm tactics, this thread lost at least three pieces of useful information.
To summarize my deleted post -
new ? marks, made by same people as last ones (which were clean MDMA), reported excellent, no test yet.
bad reports from vibes - 555's and Pink M's. I would give more detail, but who knows if it will still be here next time i check.
(Edited: Details on the pills are fine - the more the merrier, I have just edited out the material you would have preferred me to edit out in your original post... happy? BigTrancer).
[This message has been edited by BigTrancer (edited 31 January 2001).]
 
Purple black reaction CANNOT mean PMA.
And a MDXX and PMA combo seems so unlikely i dont think it needs to even be considered.
The people that have said the Rush r PMA, do u stand corrected? or have u actually tested the pill and got a different reaction.
2 days to go; only 400 tickets left; lasers in full force
smile.gif
smile.gif
(c/- the delirium newsletter)
 
hmmmm maybe I'll stand corrected then. (about the rush pills)
I was just forwarding stuff from the last thread. Someone posted about them that I guessed may have tested them with the E2 kit...
I make no comment on the deleting issue. I think it's pretty clear cut. I've said what I have to say. Commuter, you just seem like you're still pissed off and irrational.
I'll just make one point that critisism doesn't need to be abuse. Suggestions are good.
 
pink rush test clear and user reports strongly suggest pma.
But, everyone i know who's had em has loved em......
 
Thanks acid-reign.
Longetivity on BL means i will go with what u say.
Although we have two conflicting test results now dont we.
I doubt 2 different types.
hmm, pillreports all over again?
And i agree, user reports do seem like PMA is a good guess, it definitely isnt ketamine, and what else tests clear and actually has an effect.
I think we need to get those E2 testers out there.
[This message has been edited by Biscuit (edited 01 February 2001).]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top