thestudent14
Bluelighter
http://www.smh.com.au/national/dobbing-parents-pay-off-for-son-20101004-164ef.html
I didn't put this in the drug bust mega thread because I thought it was unusual for parents to do dob in their son. I'm curious to see what you guys think, my parents as I've said before hate drug's more then most people. I can't see them dobbing me in if I used a little bit but if I ever were to go down the path of dealing and they found out. I would bet my dad would send me to the slammer.
It's a tricky subject because whilst I don't see anything wrong with what he was doing I don't entirely blame the parents for doing what they did based on what I assume their knowledge of Drugs is.
However I think they definately should have approached their son first, maybe one good talk could have got him stopped dealing for the rest of his days and the cash could go towards his future, or punished him by making him give all the profits to charity.
If them speaking to him would have been enough to stop him from dealing then he doesn't need to be rehibillitated and doesn't need to serve time at such a place
Dobbing parents pay off for son
Kim Arlington
October 5, 2010
It must be a terrible dilemma for a parent - if you suspect your child is involved in something illegal, do you tell police?
Gregory Barlow's parents did. And in a decision backed by the Court of Criminal Appeal, a judge has taken it into account when giving their son a lighter sentence.
Barlow was 19 when his parents grew worried about his behaviour. They discovered $14,000 in the boot of his car and a small amount of what they thought were drugs in his bedroom. After some deliberation, they contacted police.
Barlow admitted to police that he had $120,000 in cash from the sale of 10,000 ecstasy tablets. He later pleaded guilty to supplying a commercial quantity of a prohibited drug, which carries a standard 10-year non-parole jail term.
Several elements weighed in his favour when Barlow was sentenced in April to 2½ years of periodic detention, to serve at least 15 months. The District Court judge, Colin Charteris, considered the need ''not to deter parents from bringing to attention illicit behaviour of their children".
The Crown challenged the sentence as inadequate and disputed that this was a proper consideration for sentencing as it rewarded the child for the parents' conduct. But the appeal judges, James Allsop, Lucy McCallum and Derek Price, disagreed.
Justice McCallum conceded it was rare not to impose a full-time jail term but said the sentence was ''a thoughtful and sensible exercise of judicial discretion''.
Justice Price said Barlow had reacted positively to his parents' intervention and Judge Charteris was confident about his prospects of rehabilitation given ''the support of loving parents''.
The parents' decision could not have been easy, Justice Allsop said, but it promoted the objectives of sentencing by increasing the likelihood the community would be protected and Barlow would be rehabilitated.
''Realistically, it was a decision that many parents would baulk at,'' Justice Allsop said.
''Even more would they baulk if they thought that the law would take it as a matter of no account in the sentencing process.''
I didn't put this in the drug bust mega thread because I thought it was unusual for parents to do dob in their son. I'm curious to see what you guys think, my parents as I've said before hate drug's more then most people. I can't see them dobbing me in if I used a little bit but if I ever were to go down the path of dealing and they found out. I would bet my dad would send me to the slammer.
It's a tricky subject because whilst I don't see anything wrong with what he was doing I don't entirely blame the parents for doing what they did based on what I assume their knowledge of Drugs is.
However I think they definately should have approached their son first, maybe one good talk could have got him stopped dealing for the rest of his days and the cash could go towards his future, or punished him by making him give all the profits to charity.
If them speaking to him would have been enough to stop him from dealing then he doesn't need to be rehibillitated and doesn't need to serve time at such a place
Last edited by a moderator:

that's some serious quantity!! He's probably lucky his olds found out and dogged him - he would have got the full 10 years when he was inevitably caught anyway a little while later 