Online highs are old as the net: the first e-commerce was a drugs deal

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Guardian

Mike Power
guardian.co.uk, Friday 19 April 2013 14.51 BST

With reader comments

News in this year's Global Drugs Survey that internet drug dealing was on the rise will have alarmed, surprised or intrigued many people. But the very first thing bought and sold on the net was a bag of marijuana – over 40 years ago.

In John Markoff 's 2005 book What the Dormouse Said: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer Industry (even the book's title is from a hoary old Jefferson Airplane track) he reveals that the world's first online transaction was a drug deal:

In 1971 or 1972, Stanford students using Arpanet accounts at Stanford University's Artificial Intelligence Laboratory engaged in a commercial transaction with their counterparts at Massachussetts Institute of Technology. Before Amazon, before eBay, the seminal act of e-commerce was a drug deal. The students used the network to quietly arrange the sale of an undetermined amount of marijuana.

Since then it has been, as the Grateful Dead might put it, a long strange trip, and drug users have, with the help of chemistry and neuropharmacology and telecommunications, stayed several steps ahead of the law.

More...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2013/apr/19/online-high-net-drugs-deal
 
^I have heard stories from old time dealers about the golden days when the internet started gaining popularity and the ease at which they sold drugs online.
 
Too bad this was all about RC's and fake weed. I have been buying real weed from a guy online for over a decade. I have been online since 93, I remember when you could buy a make your own GHB kit. I always thought newsgroups were cool. Today i am pretty sure my local craigslist page is full of narcs looking for drugs, maybe online made their job easier too?
The stories about RC's always mention the guinea pig factor, or the changing laws. Its the same article over and over, no one ever adopts a harm reduction stance. SR is better IMO than RC or legal high vendors. Legalization of the "good drugs" would shrink the market for the RC's.
 
Top