Obama’s drug czar: White House is ‘interested’ in medical marijuana

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
full + comments http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/...ite-house-is-interested-in-medical-marijuana/

Gil Kerlikowske, President Barack Obama’s drug czar, claimed recently that the White House is “interested in the potential marijuana may have” in medicine – but in an odd feint, he also insisted that the drug war’s Nixon-era prohibition policies are “based on science and research, not ideology or politics.”

Responding to a petition on the White House’s website that asked for a rule change to let disabled veterans use medical marijuana to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), Kerlikowske said that soldiers should not be allowed to use the drug. The White House responded to the petition even though it only had 8,258 signatures. Others have typically required 25,000 signatures or more before officials will reply.

Despite Kerlikowske’s claim that prohibitionist drug policy is “based on science,” a recent scientific study published in The Open Neurology Journal last month directly contradicts him, saying that the placement of marijuana atop the Drug Enforcement Agency’s schedule of controlled substances — a category reserved for drugs that have no medical value — is “not accurate” and “not tenable.” Scientists instead found that while marijuana has some potential for abuse, “its profile more closely resembles drugs in Schedule III (where codeine and dronabinol are listed.)”

“The continuing conflict between scientific evidence and political ideology will hopefully be reconciled in a judicious manner,” they added.

Writing on the White House website, Kerlikowske explained that the Obama administration is “interested in the potential marijuana may have in providing relief to individuals diagnosed with certain serious illnesses. That is why we ardently support ongoing research into determining what components of the marijuana plant can be used as medicine. To date, however, neither the [Food and Drug Administration] nor the Institute of Medicine have found smoked marijuana to meet the modern standard for safe or effective medicine for any condition.”

That statement comes under scrutiny thanks in part to the American Medical Association, the largest physician organization in the U.S., which admitted in 2009 that marijuana has medical value (PDF). They voted overwhelmingly in favor of calling for the reclassification of marijuana to allow for the development of new drugs, issuing a report that claims “smoked cannabis reduces neuropathic pain, improves appetite and caloric intake especially in patients with reduced muscle mass, and may relieve spasticity and pain in patients with multiple sclerosis.”

The AMA also noted that the FDA, which Kerlikowske cited as a major reason for current prohibitionist policies, has not allowed many real clinical trials of smoked marijuana. They cited just “20 small randomized controlled trials of short duration involving ~300 patients” being carried out over the last 35 years with the FDA’s authorization. Other testing is often limited before it even begins, with FDA officials insisting that scientists use pre-approved “oral preparations” of the drug, or a synthetic mimicry of THC.
 
but in an odd feint, he also insisted that the drug war’s Nixon-era prohibition policies are “based on science and research, not ideology or politics.”

Didn't Nixon declare the drug war, right after a report he read stated Marijuana is nowhere near as harmful as harder drugs? What kind of statement is this!
 
Doublethink anyone?

I use to think that perhaps this administration would do something about this war on drugs. But now I see they just want to appear to be doing something about it.
 
That is why we ardently support ongoing research into determining what components of the marijuana plant can be used as medicine. To date, however, neither the [Food and Drug Administration] nor the Institute of Medicine have found smoked marijuana to meet the modern standard for safe or effective medicine for any condition.”

It sounds to me like he's saying that he wants to look into the potential to develop various alkaloids from the marijuana plant into medication, not necessarily use the plant itself as one. Which makes sense to me, after all, doctors don't tell people in pain to smoke some opium, they prescribe a specific opioid based on the circumstances. Using smoked plant matter as medicine is actually rather crude when you think about it, and while I certainly support peoples right to do it, it's always seemed silly that the focus is on the plant itself and not the specific chemicals that cause the positive effect.
 
If marijuana becomes an extract of itself, and standardized, and pressed into pills, it won't be easy to get, and it won't get us high anymore.

Say drug companies start manufacturing some "active ingredient" and selling that.

I believe the gov't would make the stuff non euphoric.

Besides, the joy of smelling and touching a sticky bud is part of the goodness of using marijuana. I like to see fresh herb growing, or curing. I want to be able to acquire and enjoy cannabis the same way and with as little trouble as I acquire and enjoy carrots. They are both good for me and they are both not harmful to me.
 
If marijuana becomes an extract of itself, and standardized, and pressed into pills, it won't be easy to get, and it won't get us high anymore.

Say drug companies start manufacturing some "active ingredient" and selling that.

I believe the gov't would make the stuff non euphoric.

Besides, the joy of smelling and touching a sticky bud is part of the goodness of using marijuana. I like to see fresh herb growing, or curing. I want to be able to acquire and enjoy cannabis the same way and with as little trouble as I acquire and enjoy carrots. They are both good for me and they are both not harmful to me.

Which is fine, and like I said I think people should be able to grow and consume weed (all drugs, really) as much as they want. But who knows what other amazing things we could find to do with weed if we did more research into the various chemicals it contains?
 
the FDA isn't going to approve an entire plant, or even the entire bud of a plant, as a medicine. The FDA approval process has to be bypassed in this case and the plant has to be added to the GRAS list or something.

On another matter: I've taken Marinol before and it's actually pretty nice. At 10 mg I couldn't really distinguish it from weed. My only complaint was that the gel caps were more or less spherical and kept rolling off the counter and under appliances

ROX26030.JPG
 
Last edited:
I agree with what you are saying, but to nitpick, cannabinoids aren't alkaloids (Yeah, I'm a chemistry dick). 23536 is absolutely right about the GRAS list being the way to go as recognizing weed as a medicinal supplement. This is why I feel that now that 1/3 of the states (and growing) that have approved med-pot have achieved the goal of getting pot in the national discussion in a positive light, but we really need to focus on legalizing recreational use for adults, and the pendulum is swinging our way now. It would be a shame to blow it right now.
 
I would not be surprised if Obama goes for more decriminalization after he gets reelected.
 
I would not be surprised if Obama goes for more decriminalization after he gets reelected.

This. It would seriously hurt him in the election if he came out against the drug war now, I know some people think he should stand by his principles and all that, but nobody comes out ahead if he loses to Romney because too many people think 'soft on crime!!!1!' and vote red instead. Sometimes you have to be pragmatic I guess.
 
Top