NYT: LSD, Reconsidered for Therapy

wombat66

Bluelighter
Joined
Oct 19, 2001
Messages
106
LSD, Reconsidered for Therapy

By BENEDICT CAREY
MARCH 3, 2014

He heard about the drug trial from a friend in Switzerland and decided it was worth volunteering, even if it meant long, painful train journeys from his native Austria and the real possibility of a mental meltdown. He didn’t have much time, after all, and traditional medicine had done nothing to relieve his degenerative spine condition.

“I’d never taken the drug before, so I was feeling — well, I think the proper word for it, in English, is dread,” said Peter, 50, an Austrian social worker, in a telephone interview; he asked that his last name be omitted to protect his identity. “There was this fear that it could all go wrong, that it could turn into a bad trip.”

On Tuesday, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease is posting online results from the first controlled trial of LSD in more than 40 years. The study, conducted in the office of a Swiss psychiatrist near Bern, tested the effects of the drug as a complement to talk therapy for 12 people nearing the end of life, including Peter.

Most of the subjects had terminal cancer, and several died within a year after the trial — but not before having a mental adventure that appeared to have eased the existential gloom of their last days.

“Their anxiety went down and stayed down,” said Dr. Peter Gasser, who conducted the therapy and followed up with his patients a year after the trial concluded.

The new publication marks the latest in a series of baby steps by a loose coalition of researchers and fund-raisers who are working to bring hallucinogens back into the fold of mainstream psychiatry. Before research was banned in 1966 in the United States, doctors tested LSD’s effect for a variety of conditions, including end-of-life anxiety.

But in the past few years, psychiatrists in the United States and abroad — working with state regulators as well as ethics boards — have tested Ecstasy-assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress; and other trials with hallucinogens are in the works.

“The effort is both political and scientific,” said Rick Doblin, executive director of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies, a foundation that has financed many of the studies. “We want to break these substances out of the mold of the counterculture and bring them back to the lab as part of a psychedelic renaissance.”

Before taking LSD, the 12 patients in the Swiss study met with Dr. Gasser in his office for two or more sessions to get acquainted. The trial called for two drug-assisted courses of therapy, separated by a couple of weeks.

The drug’s effects would last up to 10 hours, after which the patient would sleep on a couch in the office, attended at all times by the therapist or an assistant. “I told them that each session would be right here, in a safe environment, and I am part of it,’” Dr. Gasser said. “I said, ‘I can’t guarantee you won’t have intense distress, but I can tell you that if you do, it will pass.’ ”

And so they did — and indeed it passed, though not always easily. Many wept, most squirmed; one 67-year-old man said he met his long-dead, estranged father somewhere out in the cosmos, nodding in approval.

All talked for periods with Dr. Gasser, who acted as an anchor in the storm and a fellow explorer, tracking the sources of those emotions. In the jargon of the profession, the therapy was patient-centered, open-ended and “integrative,” in that it focused on current habits of thought as well as on long-ago childhood scenes.

“I had what you would call a mystical experience, I guess, lasting for some time, and the major part was pure distress at all these memories I had successfully forgotten for decades,” Peter said. “These painful feelings, regrets, this fear of death. I remember feeling very cold for a long time. I was shivering, even though I was sweating. It was a mental coldness, I think, a memory of neglect.”
Continue reading the main story
Continue reading the main story

He was also doing something with those sensations, something he had almost never done before. He was talking about them. “It surprised me,” Peter said. “I didn’t know I was talking away until Dr. Gasser made me notice.”

After about two months of weekly therapy, the eight participants who received full doses of LSD improved by about 20 percent on standard measures of anxiety, and the four subjects who took a much weaker dose got worse. (After the trial, those patients were allowed to “cross over” and try the full dose.) Those findings held up for a year in those who have survived.

The trial was far too small to be conclusive, said Dr. Gasser, whose co-authors include Dr. Doblin, Dominique Holstein of UniversityHospital Zurich and Rudolf Brenneisen of the University of Bern. But the researchers see the results as a beginning. The drug caused no serious side effects, other than temporary — and therapeutically valuable — periods of distress.

The participants, by and large, considered the therapy worthwhile. “It’s a proof of concept,” Dr. Doblin said. “It shows that this kind of trial can be done safely, and that it’s very much worth doing.”

Peter, the social worker, agreed. “I will say I have been more emotional since the study ended, and I don’t mean always cheerful,” he said. “But I think it’s better to feel things strongly — better to be alive than to merely function.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/04/health/lsd-reconsidered-for-therapy.html
 
This is good news. I hope one day they do a trial where they use LSD to combat addiction. I think one of the most important parts of successfully overcoming addiction is being able to see the use of a substance we are addicted to for what it really is and what it really does. I think LSD could be really powerful in promoting an addict to be able to do this.
 
^^ YES YES. I dream that someday the world will wake up to the potential of LSD. For too long it has been tainted by prohibition and underworld associations. If there is a God, this molecule is the very definition of a gift/blessing from him/her.
 
There are such enormous political obstacles to the medical use of psychedelics that I'm not even gonna get my hopes up.

But, if somebody has a good strategy for chipping away at police's hegemony over medicine, I'm all ears.
 
The political obstacles are falling though (i'm not referring to general, WoD / social ideas on drugs, I mean specifically as regards academic psychedelic research. It used to be very much wide open and then was all but shelved for a while, but has been making steady strides back for decades now)

Incredibly interesting stuff, i mean when it comes to understanding psychiatry/consciousness/thought, drugs and testing will allow much stronger mapping/diagramming of what, objectively/precisely/exactly, thinking/thoughts are. Coolness!
 
You can do this yourself if you can only find the drugs and therapist on the black market.
Too bad it can't possibly be as safe, scientific, and useful as it could be with more research and an institutionally-accepted status.

One of my dreams is to do this myself, but I have never had both the drugs and the contact at the same time in my life!
 
^institutionalized/objective "shaminism" that tries to adhere to the scientific method?
/heresy!!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LSD also proved useful in the treatment of alcoholism, decades ago, before it was prohibited, and should be made available for the treatment of other addictions, in a therapeutic context (session based, with therapist, like MDMA for PTSD) and makes me wonder about ayahuasca reportedly showing people with such problems the "right way to live".
 
Not to mention that the founder of AA, Bill Wilson had his spiritual awakening on a psychedelic cocktail and the steps were created in an attempt to recreate this experience.

The Belladonna Cure[edit]

The formula[clarification needed] for Towns-Lambert cure was the deliriant, Atropa belladonna, also called deadly nightshade. The effects of belladonna include delirium, hallucinations, light sensitivity, confusion, and dry mouth. The second ingredient in the mixture was another deliriant, Hyoscyamus niger, also known as henbane, hog's bean, or insane root. It contained two alkaloids, hyoscyamine and hyoscine. The third major ingredient was the dried bark or berries of Xanthoxylum americanum, or prickly ash, added to help with diarrhea and intestinal cramps.[7] The dosage given was determined by the physiologic reaction of each patient. When the face became flushed, the throat dry, and the eyes dilated, the amount of the mixture was reduced or stopped.[8]
The mixture was given every hour, day and night, for nearly 50 hours. The end of the treatment was marked by the abundance of stools and then castor oil was given to the patient as a further purgative.[8] The treatment was also described as 'puke and purge'.[9]
Every 12 hours the patient was given CC (Compound Cathartic) pills and Blue Mass. These were 19th century medications of varying composition. Blue Mass included mercury, and was prescribed for a cornucopia of ailments.[original research?]
When a patient was admitted to the hospital while intoxicated or at the end of a spree, the first thing that was done was to put the patient to sleep. The only medication given prior to the hypnotic was the four CC pills. The hypnotic Lambert found best contained chloral hydrate and morphine along with one or two grams of paraldehyde. If the patient went to sleep easily on this hypnotic it was safe to wake him every hour for his belladonna regimen. Dr Lambert believed it was important to administer a small amount of strychnine every four hours.[10]
The week following the treatment a diet of a special tonic and simple and easy to digest meals would relax the patient.[11]"

Alcoholics Anonymous[edit]
Bill Wilson, cofounder of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), was admitted to Towns Hospital four times between 1933 and 1934. On his fourth and last stay he showed signs of delirium tremens[15] and was treated with the Belladonna Cure. He had his "Hot Flash"[vague] spiritual awakening while undergoing this treatment, either on his second or third night, depending on the source.[11] When he was released from Towns Hospital after a seven day stay, he never drank again.
Wilson's description of his experience: "All at once I found myself crying out, "If there is a God, let Him show himself! I am ready to do anything, anything! Suddenly the room lit up with a great white light. I was caught up in an ecstasy which there are no words to describe. It seemed to me in my mind's eye, that I was on a mountain and that a wind not of air but of spirit was blowing. And then it burst upon me that I was a free man. Slowly the ecstasy subsided. I lay there on the bed, but now for a time I was in another world, a new world of consciousness... and I thought to myself, "So this is the God of the preachers!" A great peace stole over me."[16]
Towns was a supporter and creditor of Alcoholics Anonymous, lending Wilson $2500 ($38000 in 2008 dollar values)[17] to enable him to write what became the "The Big Book" of Alcoholics Anonymous.[18] He later told the AA story to a writer who had it published in Liberty Magazine which led to the sale of several hundred Big Books.[improper synthesis?][19] He also offered Wilson, who had been unemployed for several years, a job as a lay therapist, which Wilson declined.[20]

>source<

See this excellent review on treatment of alcoholism with LSD in the sixties (published in 2012)

http://jop.sagepub.com/content/26/7/994

Also, at Johns Hopkins they've started doing clinical research with psilocybin trying to help people to stop smoking tobacco. There's a lot of data on the treatment of alcohol addiction with LSD in the sixties (although most of the research isn't really up to current scientific standards).

Research with ibogaine on resetting / cancelling out craving in opiate (but also other substance) users is scarce, but there's some animal data and certainly plenty anecdotal evidence.

Also interesting is this paper on addiction among ayahuasca users. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20554400
 
This is great news. I'd really like to see more studies/trials with ibogaine and other psychedelic drugs too.

Psychedelics have a place in modern medicine and especially therapy, there are so many people who swear by them, so many people they have helped live better lives. I have only used psychedelic drugs on a few occasions, and only in relatively low doses so they weren't mind blowing experiences for me, but I did feel a little more understanding of myself in the short term after using LSD.
 
"Those findings held up for a year in those who have survived."
Other than the findings about low dose patients getting worse of course.
 
LSD is being reconsidered by whom?
The title says it is being reconsidered but offers no insight into this question.
 
^unsure what you mean.. that's referring to the full-dose group only (and the low-dose / control group, that didn't get better, was given the opportunity to cross over to the proper dosage)
If you just mean that it sucks to be on the low/placebo sides of a study when the drug turns out successful, well, yeah; but that's how it's gotta be.

... I mean specifically as regards academic psychedelic research. It used to be very much wide open and then was all but shelved for a while, but has been making steady strides back for decades now)
[edit: OKAY I've found it, wasn't nichols it was doblin ;) http://www.maps.org/dissertation/ <---good explanation of the up/down history of psychedelics research freedoms]
 
^No. I am not saying anything like that. They said the results have lasted for a year. The result being high dose helped and low dose did not help. Except they gave the low dose patients a higher dose and basically ended the study.
 
But that is what you said:
"Those findings held up for a year in those who have survived."
Other than the findings about low dose patients getting worse of course.
High dose helped. Low didn't. Low dose were allowed to go high dose.

Either you worded that weird, I'm having a brain fart understanding you, or your post was reiterating the article w/o adding anything personal (the "other than" implied you were adding something, not just stating that the low dose group, as the article clearly stated, wasn't helped while on low-dose)

meh.
 
10 Crazy Facts About The Placebo Effect
DAVID DECHER FEBRUARY 16, 2013

One notable study documenting the effects of Nocebo took place in Italy where both people with and without lactose intolerance took what they thought was lactose (it wasn’t). Sure enough forty-four percent of those with intolerance and a staggering twenty-six percent without it developed symptoms of gastrointestinal discomfort.
study

Additionally, I find it remarkable that the patients in the LSD study under discussion actually had their anxiety worsened by therapy.
 
Last edited:
Okay, this is getting silly... There was a group that got lsd. lsd is active. Said group fared 20% better afterwards on measures of anxiety.
Your conflation with the placebo phenomenon may be stemming out of the fact that lsd was a psychological, and not physical, intervention, and that the (proven) improvements in the full-strength lsd group were on pscyhological markers (anxiety) not physical (blood pressure) Your point could be made IF the control group did not receive lsd- you'd be making a valid point that the group receiving no lsd knew they were the placebo group while the lsd group knew they were not the placebo group, and this knowledge caused a placebo effect that caused the lsd takers to lose anxiety while the sugar-pill people didn't lose anxiety. However, both groups took lsd, and both were gauged afterwards- there wasn't a placebo group in this study. The tests indicated that the 8 who got proper dosages had less anxiety, and the 4 who took substandard doses had increased anxiety.

proseman said:
Additionally, I find it remarkable that the patients in the LSD study under discussion actually had their anxiety worsened by therapy.
No, they did not- quote "After about two months of weekly therapy, the eight participants who received full doses of LSD improved by about 20 percent on standard measures of anxiety,"

I think you should reread the article, because yours posts are indicating that you're not understanding what you've read.
 
Okay, this is getting silly... There was a group that got lsd. lsd is active. Said group fared 20% better afterwards on measures of anxiety.
Your conflation with the placebo phenomenon may be stemming out of the fact that lsd was a psychological, and not physical, intervention, and that the (proven) improvements in the full-strength lsd group were on pscyhological markers (anxiety) not physical (blood pressure) Your point could be made IF the control group did not receive lsd- you'd be making a valid point that the group receiving no lsd knew they were the placebo group while the lsd group knew they were not the placebo group, and this knowledge caused a placebo effect that caused the lsd takers to lose anxiety while the sugar-pill people didn't lose anxiety. However, both groups took lsd, and both were gauged afterwards- there wasn't a placebo group in this study. The tests indicated that the 8 who got proper dosages had less anxiety, and the 4 who took substandard doses had increased anxiety.


No, they did not- quote "After about two months of weekly therapy, the eight participants who received full doses of LSD improved by about 20 percent on standard measures of anxiety,"

I think you should reread the article, because yours posts are indicating that you're not understanding what you've read.
I am not confused about the results. For the control group receiving the threshold "incorrect" dose of 20 mcg, their anxiety worsened after multiple therapy sessions.

From a study in the late 70’s (Analysis of Verbal Behavior; Louis A. Gottschalk, Goldine C. Gleser, University of California Press, Jan 1, 1979.), participants who received a 40 mcg "correct" dose of LSD had anxiety reduced, but not ass much as a control group receiving water.

Sorry, but you would not know whether you received such a small dose of LSD?
 
Last edited:
Top