No End to Drug Traffic in Sight as U.S. Nears Afghanistan Exit

S.J.B.

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Jan 22, 2011
Messages
6,924
Location
Canada
No End to Drug Traffic in Sight as U.S. Nears Afghanistan Exit
Alissa J. Rubin and Matthew Rosenberg
The New York Times
May 26th, 2012

KABUL, Afghanistan — For years, American officials have struggled to curb Afghanistan’s opium industry, rewriting strategy every few seasons and pouring in more than $6 billion over the past decade to combat the poppies that help finance the insurgency and fuel corruption.

It is a measure of the problem’s complexity that officials can find little comfort even in the news this month that blight and bad weather are slashing this year’s poppy harvest in the south. They know from past seasons that blight years lead to skyrocketing opium prices and even greater planting efforts to come.

“Now I am desperate, what can I do?” said Mohammed Amin, a poppy farmer in Tirin Kot in Oruzgan Province, who harvested only one kilogram of opium poppy this year compared with 15 last year. “I don’t have any cash now to start another business, and if I grow any other crops, I cannot make a profit.”

The seemingly unbreakable allure of poppy profits — for producers and traffickers, government officials and Taliban commanders alike — has kept fighting opium at the heart of efforts to improve security. It drove Richard C. Holbrooke, later the special envoy to Afghanistan, to write in 2008: “Breaking the narco-state in Afghanistan is essential, or all else will fail.”

That concern is no less serious today, on the eve of the departure of thousands of American troops. But even as American leaders continue to emphasize the importance of the anti-opium effort, some officials are privately conceding that there is little chance for its large-scale success before the end of the NATO military mission in 2014.

Read the full story here.
 
Our pharmaceutical companies use opium for painkillers, why doesn't the government offer the illegal growers a higher price than cartels do. Even if they sell it to the pharmaceutical companies at a lower price than they bought it for the difference couldn't be nearly as much as they spend on eradication efforts.
 
there was virtually no opium production before we entered.

we obviously didn't go there to END production...
 
Our pharmaceutical companies use opium for painkillers, why doesn't the government offer the illegal growers a higher price than cartels do. Even if they sell it to the pharmaceutical companies at a lower price than they bought it for the difference couldn't be nearly as much as they spend on eradication efforts.
It's not that simple. We already have countries doing that(I wanna say Turkey, India perhaps, and I think Australia or someone around there, I forget). Those countries wouldn't want another player in the industry. Also, there's infrastructure that's needed for that to work. Afghanistan is rather lacking in that department. And rather lacking is a huge understatement, lol.
there was virtually no opium production before we entered.

we obviously didn't go there to END production...
No, there was opium production before we got there. There was even opium production during the Soviet war era and before that. People mistakingly think that the Taliban stopped opium production. They didn't, they lowered it for a few years simply as a tactic to boost the price of their stockpiled opium.



Just as keeping drugs illegal is entrenched in so many industries here, opium is entrenched over there. Everyone has a hand in it -the farmers, law enforcement, insurgents, and politicians.

Legalizing drugs here or in Europe would help them the most, but that's as likely to happen as completely eradicating poppies over there is.
 
Top