• 🇳🇿 🇲🇲 🇯🇵 🇨🇳 🇦🇺 🇦🇶 🇮🇳
    Australian & Asian
    Drug Discussion


    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • AADD Moderators: Tronica

NEWS: SMH - 11/01/2007 'Testing the ties that bind us'

hoptis

Bluelight Crew
Joined
May 1, 2002
Messages
11,081
Location
Melbourne
Testing the ties that bind us
Author: Words Paula Goodyer
Date: 11/01/2007

Being there for someone with a drug addiction can make the difference between life and death.

Nicole Kidman makes headlines when her husband's drug dependency becomes news but thousands of other Australians are in a similar situation - living with someone else's substance abuse.

Their numbers are unknown but the guess is the 23,000 parents, partners and other relatives of drug users who call the Family Drug Support Helpline each year are the tip of the iceberg. A 2001 estimate put the numbers of heroin-dependent people in Australia at about 98,000 and while this figure has probably fallen since then, if you add those who are dependent on alcohol, cannabis and amphetamines you have a lot of people - all with parents, partners and children whose lives become changed when someone they love becomes dependent on a drug.

One of them is Lainie*, a Sydney health worker in her 40s who's struggling with a dilemma common to people in her situation. Does she ask her 45-year-old partner - who has become dependent on ice - to leave, but worry that he may become homeless? Or does she live with the situation, knowing he's safer but wonder if she's making it easier for him to continue his drug use by letting him stay?

"For me, it's lonely and sad. He's either physically or emotionally absent - out of the house for four days, then at home asleep for the next four days. He's not fulfilling the role of a partner, just occupying space in my life and my house which could be filled with a real relationship," she says.

"The decision is excruciating. He's a decent man, not aggressive. He's a workaholic who began using ice to get more work done - or maybe that was an excuse. Now he's lost his business and I've paid the debts. If I were a parent, the decision would be easier. I'd let him stay. But someone said to me 'You're making it easy for him to come down in comfort. If he had to deal with coming down in a less comfortable place like the pavement, maybe it would motivate him to change.' But I know homeless people get bashed up," says Lainie. "What you really want is a magic wand."

There is no magic wand but at least there's more support for the partners and families of drug- and alcohol-dependent people. Not long ago, families were largely overlooked by the professionals who treat drug dependency. Attention was focused on helping the drug user, while partners, parents, siblings and children were left to cope with the grief, fear and sometimes chaos, violence and theft that come with loving someone with an addiction. But now more than 400 people have graduated from a course available in NSW and Canberra that provides a path for families living with a drug-dependent person. Called Stepping Stones to Success, it's run by Family Drug Support and includes education about addiction and strategies for coping with the fallout of drug dependence. This year it's expanding to Adelaide, Perth, Brisbane and Geelong.

"Ten years ago families were seen as a problem, as being volatile or emotional or perhaps contributing to the person's dependency," says Tony Trimingham, the head of Family Drug Support and a former relationship counsellor who developed the program. "While there are some families who have been part of the problem, this isn't true of most."

Typically, he says, parents go through stages when they find out a child has a problem with alcohol or drugs. The first reaction is to feel guilty and blame themselves, the second is to become determined to fix the person's problem.

"It can divide the parents - typically the father will take a shape-up-or-ship-out approach, while the mother does a juggling act, trying to keep everyone happy, rescuing her child but not telling her partner. It can split the couple, with one parent, saying 'It's your fault, you're too hard' and the other saying 'It's your fault, you're too soft'. The aim of Stepping Stones is to move both to the centre. There's no formula. Everyone has to find their own way," he says.

The program also teaches families that while you can't make the person stop, you can change yourself and manage the situation more easily.

But while Stepping Stones is about giving families the tools to cope, it's also about strengthening the relationship between the family and the dependent person - which improves the drug user's chance of recovery, Trimingham says.

"When families do better the drug user tends to do better - it's when the drug user becomes disconnected that they're more likely to end up on the street, or with a more destructive peer group. Families who cope better are experts in what makes the dependent person tick and can help keep them motivated when they struggle with treatment.

"You hear the same thing over again from people who've recovered or cut down their drug use: 'I'm so pleased my family stuck by me, otherwise I'd probably be dead'.

"It's a harm minimisation approach - you might not make all the major changes today but you're keeping them safe until they're ready to give up. You're buying time."

Families often live with the anxiety of knowing someone they love is in trouble with the law or risking overdose. They're all kinds of families, too. "Our evidence is that it can happen to any family and that less than 50 per cent of drug users fit the stereotype of someone from a dysfunctional family ... most drug-dependent people are connected to their families, many have jobs," Trimingham says.

"If you're a partner, you have more choice about whether to go or stay. Parents don't usually have that. FDS tells you to follow your heart and make a choice you can live with. Some people take a tough approach, some are softer. But even if you ask someone to leave, you can make it clear you're not abandoning them and stay connected. Even if you take out an apprehended violence order you can still stay connected and have a sense of love and support."

* Names have been changed.

Strengthening bonds

Better Relationships in Every Family, a program for residents and their families at the Sydney rehabilitation centre Odyssey House, improves a drug-dependent person's chances of recovery, according to James Pitts, the chief executive officer of Odyssey House.

"Seventy per cent of Odyssey's graduates are still drug free one year later - most are those who have completed the BRIEF course with their families."

The six-week program, commended in last year's National Drug and Alcohol Awards, makes a difference because families gain a better understanding of dependence, better communication skills and learn that trust, often a casualty of living with someone with an addiction, can be rebuilt, he says.

"Families and drug users need help to resolve their problems, otherwise the user finishes treatment and goes home to the same unresolved issues. For someone who's using drugs, just knowing they have support can help them recover but if they don't have that support, it's easier to feel they have nothing to lose by continuing."

For more information

Family Drug Support

1300 368 186, www.fds.org.au

Odyssey House 9820 9999

Source: SMH
Publication: Sydney Morning Herald
Section: Essential
Page: 10
 
Sounds very positive. The FDS website is worth taking a look at. It's nice to see they aren't a religious based organisation.
 
I whole heartedly agree. My parents stuck by me for over 20m yrs. I was a cronic pot smoker, dabbled in every drug you have heard of and probably some you havn't and now are pretty much drug free. I'm one of the lucky ones. While i have experimented with everything from crack to smack, i was only ever addicted to mull, albiet cronically. My parents not being judgemental and always being there is the reason i'm still alive.
These days i'm fundamentally clean, i have the very occassional smoke or line but instead of daily it's once every 4 months. Wine is my vice days and i keep that under control. Addictions really suck.
 
*whips out a hanky* very happy indeed. They're dealing with this "taboo" issue, instead of continuing to not address the problem. Best of all, nothing in that passes any judgement on the druggies.
 

Funny thing this "Ice"....

I have, over the last 17odd years, been keeping an eye on the media reports about Crystal from Hawaii, Philippines, Thailand and now Australia.

There are very similar patterns of reports of lives shattered.....

Some media reports even warned Australia about Crystal 10+ years ago.
 
phase_dancer said:
Sounds very positive. The FDS website is worth taking a look at. It's nice to see they aren't a religious based organisation.
Do u mean its nice that a non religous organisation is also doing something about this problem or do u mean it's nice that this organisation is not religiuos
 
Probably means he is happy if you go there you won't have the bible shoved in your face and be told to accept Jesus into your bowels to be forgiven for using the drugs.
 
Splatt said:
Probably means he is happy if you go there you won't have the bible shoved in your face and be told to accept Jesus into your bowels to be forgiven for using the drugs.
bowels? i think someones been trying to spread the word in a most unorthodox manner
 
koggi said:
Do u mean its nice that a non religous organisation is also doing something about this problem or do u mean it's nice that this organisation is not religiuos

For me I think it would be the latter, nothing (well not too much anyway) against organised religion personally, but when it comes to welfare/support organisations to help drug users, I think it would be better if the help didn't come from a foundation of morality-based ideology... otherwise you get things like Narconon.

I think there are parallels with this to the recent debate about Tony Abbott awarding a contract for family counselling services recently to a Catholic organisation.
 
That could work :)
I don't have a problem with spirituality, that has genuinely beneficial uses that most people can incorporate into their lives or beliefs. Christianity and other other cults don't really offer much besides a load of hogswash, they take some of the good ideas from other beliefs and what not but they go around serving it in the wrong way.
 
Every time I hear the word shamanic I think of ebeneezergood (sp?) by the shamens!! but ive read abit about shamanism which is quite cool. I did go to rehab in the early 90s which was queen elizabeth in hamner springs/south island, it was like $20,000 for 1 month, which fortunately at the time was subsidised by the govt. The place was magical but all I got was over weight and a happy spiritual buzz for about a month after leaving, I think it was the 12 step stuff that got me pissed about it. Funny enough im always bumping into friends I made there at parties, bars, holiday trips.
Was almost like a mormon religion, nonetheless it was an interesting experience, after a google search I found that theres a free online nz rehab site/cads, heh very innovative I guess..

n.b. While at hamner the psychotherapy was pretty intense, so was 'bashing the dummies with a rubber hose', also the art gallery/art room was the most depressing art ive ever seen.
 
^ 'bashing the dummies with a rubber hose' - what is that?


A lot of treatment is 12 step based and starts with acknowledging a higher power, dethroning the ego which can be handy, normally it is up to the individual whether they want to call it God or Luck or Karma or Higher Self or the Universe depending on what other issues they have, it's just good to stay open to something other than oneself.
 
starboy said:
^ 'bashing the dummies with a rubber hose' - what is that?


A lot of treatment is 12 step based and starts with acknowledging a higher power, dethroning the ego which can be handy, normally it is up to the individual whether they want to call it God or Luck or Karma or Higher Self or the Universe depending on what other issues they have, it's just good to stay open to something other than oneself.

Heh - it was to fight the inner child! because apparently we all have one! I was given a rock to carry around for the day, and if it dropped on my foot/or just plain dropped it meant I was not ready to cleanse myself to the powerful totara tree (which was a song that we all held hands around the tree and sung). If somehow I didnt drop it, it meant I was able to release into the sea!. The final day was called 'stepping out', this is when everyone applauds you as you have truely become drug and alcohol free, but of course ONLY if you were to go to 12 step meetings and even several times a day.
Another thing was 'pairing off', so if you were seen to hang with someone all the time you were banned from being in their presence, as their addiction may overpower your own.For some of the other addicts there whole life depended on 'stepping out', and some stayed for months due to their nail biting, anxiety attacks. However we did see alot of old videos like the one about the history of benzos in NZ and 'go ask alice..'. This was all cutting edge!! theyd have spokesman from different organisations, but ALOT were americans that come over to analyse everything, they basically gave out a whole load of crap. One was 'trevor grice' the author for 'the great brain robbery', some of the addicts wanted to believe everything he said, and walked around the ex psychiatric hospital with the 12 step blue book bible in their hands, as if it was there last dying hope.
I did the narcotics anonymous meetings, was even a sponsor. Youd get people whod say they were 10 years clean, to then find them drinking in an obscure pub. One thing I do take and consider, is 'one day at a time'. Looking back at it now, I am ALOT wiser than I was then (meaning I was given a huge amount of money/inheritance, and I was young - stupid, to now self employed/IT, and happy with my life). As futuristic as I want to be, drugs is part of my life, and id rather work with it, than die fighting for hope. This is my opinion, but any BL'ers that think they need over priced institutionalised rehabilitation, then by means, try it for yourself - everyone is different.

n.b If I knew how to produce film, id make some type of rehab sitcom!!
edit: The alcoholics wre given ant acid or something like that, so if they had a drink theyd froth up and choke, not kidding you.. Opiate addicts were on methadone (which was my case being there), which I think is bollocks, cos even that was addictive. And oops its queen mary rehab centre, which just found out now closed in 2002.
 
Last edited:
hoptis said:
For me I think it would be the latter, nothing (well not too much anyway) against organised religion personally, but when it comes to welfare/support organisations to help drug users, I think it would be better if the help didn't come from a foundation of morality-based ideology... otherwise you get things like Narconon.

I think there are parallels with this to the recent debate about Tony Abbott awarding a contract for family counselling services recently to a Catholic organisation.
agreed, and though personally i do believe yahweh,God,Allah or faith in whatever form can play a significant role in healing/treatment, it is most unfortunate that like pills(not all pills), religious organisations can be adulterated too
 
This will probably be a bit of a rant on my part...

agreed, and though personally i do believe yahweh,God,Allah or faith in whatever form can play a significant role in healing/treatment....

If you're talking of physical states of disease then that's absolute rubbish!

It's been demonstrated on several occasions that prayer, or other faith does not statistically alter the outcome of a disease state. There are many studies that claim it does, but these are always flawed, usually by the control process or bias in interpretation.

Faith when applied to recovering drug addicts is merely transferring one mistake for another. What happens when faith is shattered, or reality sets in? The gapping hole that then comes from realizing the truth can be just as disturbing as any drug withdrawal. From my experience, reformed drug addicts that gave up drugs through, or because of religion, typically tend to be of the worst kind of religious fanatic. Is it any wonder why they're often among the most violent whenever rational argument is used to highlight the B/S of their belief system?

However, in saying that, I would never deny or suggest such to anyone dying of a terminal disease. In such cases, delusions or beliefs are usually of little harm - the person is going to die anyway - and in many cases I agree that it provides great comfort to some, even if the basis for it is so totally false.


However, like politics, we need to remove religion from medicine/ rehab/abortion consultation, etc. altogether. It has no place in a society that relies on, and depends on scientific principles and discovery to the degree the world currently does. In one form or another, religion is responsible for most of the wars, it hinders or prevents certain research, it takes away rational choice, interferes with human progression and in short, threatens our very survival.


I'd suggest to anyone on either side of the fence to watch the recent presentations from the conference titled Beyond Belief: Religion, Science, Reason and Survival. or if that's a little too much (~3 days worth of streaming video) then just have a look at Richard Dawkin's recent doco: Root of all evil . Parts 2,3,4 & 5 can also be found on youtube. Better still, read "Letter to a Christian Nation" or "The End of Faith" by Sam Harris.

If this post seems offensive to some, I make no apologies. Beliefs are simply unfounded irrational ideals, and should never come into an argument that is based on established scientific principles.
 
phasedancer, i said CAN play a role. ive seen it work sometimes and sometimes not. take a chill pill ffs. to love needs no science. Anything that works. respect
 
just watched "root of all evil". cheers 4 the link. by the way, twas a grand rant u did have
 
Top