• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

New RCs in the UK : Version 2 any vendor talk and this is getting closed

Ghostface said:
That is something else that does not make sense to me. The pellets are made using a press which should result in uniform distribution and not have such a range of variance.
Click to expand...

Getting an equal dose when you're doing thousands of tablets is a lot more complicated than mixing X amount of drug with Y amount of fillers & binders then chucking in the hopper of a pressing machine.

I wish some of the controlled RCs were a bit easier to get ahold of. Getting say DPT to replenish my stock is a pain in the arse in comparison with getting 6-APB - and with that I'm going to have the last of my DPT shortly. Phone off the hook, comfortable sofa and a selection of tunes ready to delight me - Doremi Fasol Latido album ready to go, Brainstorm is immenant!
 
fastandbulbous said:
Getting an equal dose when you're doing thousands of tablets is a lot more complicated than mixing X amount of drug with Y amount of fillers & binders then chucking in the hopper of a pressing machine.

I wish some of the controlled RCs were a bit easier to get ahold of. Getting say DPT to replenish my stock is a pain in the arse in comparison with getting 6-APB - and with that I'm going to have the last of my DPT shortly. Phone off the hook, comfortable sofa and a selection of tunes ready to delight me - Doremi Fasol Latido album ready to go, Brainstorm is immenant!
Click to expand...

The inconsistency of the pellet size is what is weird, not the dose in each pellet. That is a whole new ball game.

The image below was posted in pd a few minutes ago.

As a general rule, press machines should not have such variance. Maybe pill presses are different, but textbook definition is when you want uniforn distribution in size and shape, you use a press.

IMG_0108.jpg
 
The amount of drug in a pellet is determined by many other factors eg density of drug vs fillers, particulate size of drug vs fillers (finer powder will settle to bottom, lumpy bits to the top, everything else being equal) and for powder in powder mixtures, when combining both powders, one should never try to dilute one in the other by 10:1 ratio as it causes areas with as hot spots whithin the mixture
 
muttonchops said:
interesting. I imagine at some point the pellet size got changed. Surely it still contains the same amount of active product tho?
Click to expand...
I've got at least four distinct sizes of pellet (all from the same packet): 300, 320, 370 and 390 mg. There are a few at various sizes between 370 and 390 too. As for active product per pellet, that's not clear. Certainly my one dose thus far was at the upper end of pellet mass, and near the upper end of subjectively positive reported single-pellet experiences; but I don't think enough data is available to infer a correlation.
 
Mental Kenny said:
I ordered some from the vendor who claims to be the only legitimate one, paid for it but now he sent me an email saying that since this is an international order he needs me to send him some proof of ID for an anti-fraud verification, like a scan of my driver's license.
Click to expand...

I had the same problem. I sent them a scan of the front of my credit card, thinking if it was a scam, they would have this information anyway.

Afterwards, the order was updated to "dispatched".

We'll see what happens next... :\
 
alfa1983 said:
Hi guys,
This may not be the correct forum, maybe needs to go to ADD but...

I can't find any info.

IUPAC 6-morpholin-4-yl-4 Di(Phenyl)Hexan-3-one
CAS 63766-87-7
Can anybody help? What the hell is it?
Click to expand...

It's the 6-Demethylated analogue of Phenadoxone, which is an opiate analgesic.
 
invert said:
I've got at least four distinct sizes of pellet (all from the same packet): 300, 320, 370 and 390 mg. There are a few at various sizes between 370 and 390 too. As for active product per pellet, that's not clear. Certainly my one dose thus far was at the upper end of pellet mass, and near the upper end of subjectively positive reported single-pellet experiences; but I don't think enough data is available to infer a correlation.
Click to expand...

at least u got pellets :)

mine came crushed! rather annoying :(
a
 
they seems to be really hard pressed and a lot of people saying it makes them come on too slow, probs best off crushing them
 
Seeing as NRG type products tend to be completely random then I wouldn't count on it. Its claiming to be:

1 - 6-APB
2 - 6-APB alternative
3 - 6-APDB chemical formula
4 - Chemical structure that isn't either 6-apb/6-apdb

Why bother? Its obviously bullshit.
 
Last edited:
Fuck knows what it is, bit the image is listed as looks pretty :0)

2 eyes and a tail - symmetrical

anywhere I can plug in a chemical shape drawing and get a name ?
 
Yeah, that 6-apb thread in PD went on longer than I thought it should have. It was obvious where these people were buying them from. It was really close to the nub on vendor discussion.

Will we ever know which posters were on the level and which ones were *v-word*
Click to expand...

Towards the end there wasnt many people saying good things about this RC.
 
whoremoaning said:
It was such a mess that loads of people got banned - its been unapproved until further notice/senior mods can deal with it.
Click to expand...

Thanks for that... had been searching all over

Is there any way to follow mod discussions about decisions do delete posts and threads or ask questions.? are such threads archived somewhere?

i admit to have used that thread incorrectly posting social stuff and subjective reports while on the stuff (actually seems i had AMT in the cap not '6-apb'). however there were posts that i would like to look back on with a clear head
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top