• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

New Lysergamides....

ScotchMist said:
I don't suppose Wikipedia would know much about them. That'd be why I wasn't looking there 8(
Click to expand...

The intention was to use Wikipedia to connote the idea of cursory, perfunctory research conducted on the Internet. That is to say, this type of desultory research was meant to be represented, by way of ostensive definition (more precise terminology, which I'm certain exists, eludes me at the moment), through its exemplification, by the use of Wikipedia.

At the time, it seemed a fairly transpicuous use of figurative language, and I did not expect it to be interpreted literally, as if I had thought you were actually researching these lysergamides on Wikipedia.

Come to think of it, this explanation probably wouldn't be taken as clear and straightforward as I'd like it to be. However, explaining one's usage of a rhetorical device or some literary technique is not particularly easy, in most cases.
 
Nom de Plume said:
The intention was to use Wikipedia to connote the idea of cursory, perfunctory research conducted on the Internet. That is to say, this type of desultory research was meant to be represented, by way of ostensive definition (more precise terminology, which I'm certain exists, eludes me at the moment), through its exemplification, by the use of Wikipedia.

At the time, it seemed a fairly transpicuous use of figurative language, and I did not expect it to be interpreted literally, as if I had thought you were actually researching these lysergamides on Wikipedia.

Come to think of it, this explanation probably wouldn't be taken as clear and straightforward as I'd like it to be. However, explaining one's usage of a rhetorical device or some literary technique is not particularly easy, in most cases.
Click to expand...
Russell, is that you? :p
 
lurching said:
I transpicuously concur
Click to expand...

ScotchMist said:
Russell, is that you? :p
Click to expand...

This kind of witless mockery really does grow stale after awhile. The first time my writing was ridiculed, I was irate. The second time, I was amused. The third time, I was annoyed. But by the fourth time, I was just plain bored.

The ennui really does become more insufferable as the jeering becomes more hackneyed and vapid.

But really, I do get it. Everyone's a joker. But, now that we are all thoroughly stultified with our daily dose of bromidic bullshit, may we please proceed with the discussion?
 
I really have been out of the loop. I can't remember any legal lysergamides (bar LSAs) being widely available on the market when I was into this. I just had a search and found a few really interesting ones.

Has anyone tried LSZ?
 
I feel better now. That's all I need to know. I must take it.

Blood from a feckin' stone. I'll prepare a list of questions in future.
 
I can but apologise, Don <3

It's be said a million times but AL-LAD and LSZ are kinda like LSD split in half. The former is the light, fluffy, giggly visual extravaganza aspect whilst the latter is the less visually active, more introspective aspect. Both are fine substances.
 
Sounds like I would much prefer the latter then.

I did take mushrooms quite a few times this season which was the first time I'd taken, what I'd consider to be a proper psychedelic, since some 2ci from a few years ago. Although, it was a very mentally light experience for me compared to others. I've gone through a few grams of aMT and some 5-meo-dalt in that time but I wouldn't consider them to have had properly psychedelic effects on me.

I'm assuming that both said lysergamides have a similar duration to LSD though and I just never really had the endurance for long trips unless they're the rare amazing ones, or solo trips where I can just lay down and listen to music.
 
Shambles said:
Both AL-LAD and LSZ have around half the duration of LSD I'd say.
Click to expand...

I too feel this is a bit off. Both are for me about 7 or 8 hours, shorter than lsd but not half the duration. Also, lsz can get visual and fun too, but allad is generally more eye candy and forgiving...
however both lack the magic afterglow of a good lsd trip
 
Seems very cheap.

Me: got any of that 1p LSD?
Dealer: fuck off, it's a fiver a tab.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top