New approach to drugs seeks footing in Costa Rica

phr

Bluelighter
Joined
May 25, 2004
Messages
36,649
Location
St. Charles, IL
New approach to drugs seeks footing in Costa Rica
Mike McDonald
Tico Times
4.16.10



The drug debate in Latin America has started to shift.

For decades, possession and addiction in the Americas have been treated with a zero tolerance policy. Efforts to slow drug use have largely centered on arresting and punishing users.

But packed jails, overburdened court systems, and a growing consensus that the war on drugs is failing are transforming the discussion.

In August, 2009, Argentina's Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional to prosecute people for possession of drugs for personal use. One month later, Colombia's high court issued a similar ruling.

In Peru and Bolivia, there are now small clinics that give cocoa leaves to crack addicts in order to manage and lessen their addiction. Bolivia's President, Evo Morales, has asked the United Nations to eliminate the narcotics label on the coca plant.

Now, in Costa Rica, high-ranking officials are joining the tolerance dialogue.

In March, Costa Rica's Chief Prosecutor, Francisco Dall'Anese, proposed offering free drugs to addicts as a way to compete with dealers. Squeezing in between the addict and the supplier to offer a cheap alternative would “break” the finances of drug pushers and “reduce demand,” he told the Spanish–language daily La Nación.

“Here, what we would do is preempt the business of drug dealing,” he said.

The reasoning behind the proposal is fairly simple. By stopping the flow of income to drug dealers and eradicating the addict's need to steal in order to buy another fix, crime rates should drop.

This idea is not revolutionary. Countries in North America and Europe have used harm reduction techniques such as methadone clinics for years to treat heroin addiction.

These efforts have been regarded as successful in reducing crime and curving addiction by medical journals.

Dall'Anese's proposal, though, does represent a fundamental shift in Costa Rican drug policy, as providing addicts with free, chemical substitutes would take the drug addiction problem out of the hands of law enforcement and place it at the doorstep of public health officials.

Link!
 
this seems better than the current system. still a bunch of commie nonsense imo. just legalize them. the free market will create low prices that everyone can afford with a normal job.
 
Yah, this got a 2-page article in the newspaper here. interesting tidbit about the chief prosecutor here, the same guy that is wanting to give addicts free drugs. his son died of a drug overdose, and after that, he made his own little war on drugs his #1 priority.
 
Yah, that'd be ideal, but at least consumption and personal possession here is not a criminal issue. Cops will take it from you if you're caught with it, but there's no crime they can charge you with.
 
this seems better than the current system. still a bunch of commie nonsense imo. just legalize them. the free market will create low prices that everyone can afford with a normal job.

Yea just like your social security and medicare... In regards to free market, we in the states do not have a free market. Although, as our markets have become less and less regulated, well... proof is in the pudding no? One of the good things to come with this recession is that ass hats like Alan Greenspan have had to admit that they don't know shit. And if you go back to Adam Smith you'll read that he wasn't even advocating a free market. IDK I have as much faith in macro economic theory as I do in religion, it's just doesn't meet empirical standards and at the end of the day it's just abstract theory.:p
 
The U.S. has never had a true laissez faire capitalism free market. What is referred to as a "free market" in the U.S. is actually a mixed economy of freedom and government control/regulation. The degree to which these "free markets" have problems is to the degree the government intrudes into them.
 
The only problem with what the costa rican government is wanting to do is that there is no chemical substitute for crack, which is our #1 problem drug here. The amount of powder and rock that is floating around this country is massive, as locals that are involved in the trade are usually paid with product.

They are wanting to model this after Australia, giving out methadone to heroin addicts, but we don't have a heroin problem, and there's no substitute for crack. CR isn't wanting to supply addicts with actual crack, but I applaud them for approaching the matter with a more logical angle.
 
The U.S. has never had a true laissez faire capitalism free market. What is referred to as a "free market" in the U.S. is actually a mixed economy of freedom and government control/regulation. The degree to which these "free markets" have problems is to the degree the government intrudes into them.


Yea that's what I said... Can you point to some country that doese have laissez faire capitalism as an example of your silly theory working? Can you give me a scenario where by do to governments not intervening, the events of our recent economic problems wouldn't have occured. Didn't think so, and shut up.:p
 
Although this comment was not directed at me,

Can you point to some country that doese have laissez faire capitalism as an example of your silly theory working? Can you give me a scenario where by do to governments not intervening, the events of our recent economic problems wouldn't have occured. Didn't think so, and shut up

Though not directed at me, I personally can't think of any. But I can think of many countries with command economies that made out fabulously.8) Countries like the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslovia, East Germany, Bulgaria, Albania, Poland, for instance. Cuba and North Korea are shinning examples of socialist paradises. China seems to have caught a bad case of capitalism and and Vietnam has headed in that direction. Last I heard, North Korea had taken up that capitalistic evil of drug dealing to feed its people and WMD program.

Thats the problem, there are no true examples of laissez faire economic system
nor any examples of countries were drug prohibition do not exist. Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results. How do you break this chain DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT. These remain untried theoretical constructs so far as the contemporary world is concerned.

The Costa Rican plan sounds more sensible than the current status qo to me, though, and their logic is sound, from my standpoint.

I remember in CA in the late 90s- the deregulation of the utilities industry. That was pure bullshit for greater gov control, favoritism, and corruption. I remember the rolling blackouts that resulted. This was a major reason why Grey Davis was recalled and Arnold was elected for what good that did.
 
Yea just like your social security and medicare... In regards to free market, we in the states do not have a free market. Although, as our markets have become less and less regulated, well... proof is in the pudding no?

Social security and medicare have nothing to do with the free market.

In most respects markets in the US are being more regulated not less.

I don't see how you can argue a free market for drugs wouldn't make them affordable to anyone. Cigs and alcohol would make better comparisons than medicare and social security lol...
 
Although this comment was not directed at me,



Though not directed at me, I personally can't think of any. But I can think of many countries with command economies that made out fabulously.8) Countries like the Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslovia, East Germany, Bulgaria, Albania, Poland, for instance. Cuba and North Korea are shinning examples of socialist paradises. China seems to have caught a bad case of capitalism and and Vietnam has headed in that direction. Last I heard, North Korea had taken up that capitalistic evil of drug dealing to feed its people and WMD program.

Thats the problem, there are no true examples of laissez faire economic system
nor any examples of countries were drug prohibition do not exist. Insanity is doing the same thing and expecting different results. How do you break this chain DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT. These remain untried theoretical constructs so far as the contemporary world is concerned.

I don't know how you figured I was endorsing command economies. At the same time I don't think it accurate that you include Cuba on the list of failed economies. When you compare Cuba to it's neighbors, it's done quite well for it's citizens, and who knows how well it would do if it's neighbor weren't trying to fuck it all the time. American trained death squads? Nope. Massive dichotomy between rich and poor? Nope. Free health care? Yes. Quality health care? Yes. Free school? Yes. Etc. Just because I reject the nonsense idea that if you provide absolutely no regulation, industries will just regulate themselves doesn't mean I endorse the other end of the spectrum. An alternative would be dirigisme, which has worked out quite well.

You are correct there are no laissez faire economies, but one could draw some conclusion from say observing the effect small scale deregulation has. Or one could just use common sense. There are however examples of countries that no longer practice drug prohibition, eg Portugal. Your shits weak! Shiiiiiiits weak!:p
 
To call any of those nations Communist is a misnomer- none of them, despite a few during very narrow portions of their existance, could even be identified as Socialist (nations like North Korea and a host of other 'National Liberation Front' nation-states use Marxist-Leninist language as a cover for simple state capitalist policies. A mix between Keynesianism and authoritarianism. There is nothing Marxist about them). A Command Economy was the invention of the Soviet Union, and is not of itself the definition of a Socialist state.

The idea of substitution drugs is fine when it comes to reduction and detoxification programs- but for the same of Harm Reduction, not every addict should be forced into such programs. I think that treatments like Methadone and Buprenorphine and Morphine and DHC maintenance should be freely available- as well as the right of an addict to walk into any pharmacy and request any amount of currently illicit drugs.

Treatment and maintenance do not have to be the same thing.
 
Last edited:
trying to get information on costa rice and this gets into a political debate..how funny..Tcort was only one with facts... narco is WITHOUT DOUBT a supporter of a pres even over half of his own party dislike. the other guy was taking about how government intervening and regulation have screwed us economically and WOW think narco was getting his little brother slapped around and coming to the rescue! why are Obamanuts that way? all politicains are crooked, and this is about the expense of DRUG WAR which is BIG GOVERNMENT. If you nkew anything about american politics, Clinton-D DDDDD, made the worse drug law in years! The analogue law right after the MDMA, that basically says that any powder that gives a pleausrable experience is automatically a scedule 1 (WORSE) who cares is he inhaled or not, Dems make sure to invest more tax into war on drugs,which makes more gov jobs like prison guards, and cops..just what we need more of
 
Top