• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe |

Need your help with "designer drug" segment on Tv network

Deleted member 290563

Greenlighter
Joined
May 23, 2013
Messages
9,034
Location
Silicodone Valley
I'm going to be supplying information/guidance on a "designer drug" (we like to call them RCs) news story being done by a major cable network. I'm being used on account of both my academic and not-so-academic areas of interest.

What I want advice on things to include, in line with the goals of this form, I will be attempting to slant this segment as far into a pro-drug/harm reduction story as possible, I believe the journalist's motive is primarily harm reduction but i will get in information about academic and medical research done now days with hallucinogenic drugs and their use withing society.

if you can provide suggestions for points to hit on in a list under each of those two categories "harm reduction" "and positives and uses/of psychs it would be appreciated so I make sure I don't miss something important. I also believe that by making people aware of what the REAL dangers are of doing street drugs, not just telling them don't do them whatsoever will decrease the amount of ODs, arrests, death etc that end up on the news and give bad press.

for example some things I plan on adding in the danger/harm reduction sections is.

things leading to overdose/harmreduction topics:
1. drug misidentification: extreme potency of new RCs compared to classical/popular drugs RCs being passed off as MDMA like PMA or 2-cx's
2. lower (much) LD50 of intended to mimic drugs, i.e. nbome's vs lsd
2. hot spots in improper dealer cutting
3. inexperienced user/not waiting for drug to hit or not titrating doses
4. redosing and nonlinear dose response curves
5. trusting others with dosage
6. testing materia
7. taking two different untested substances in a night can lead to a dangerious combo i.e., a "DXM pressed pill, followed by real MDMA...not good

8. dirty synths/purification from unregulated labs




As far as research in this area, I know of studies done with classical drugs like psilocybin, MDMA, lsd and such but there have been some human studies I'm aware of on newer/ synthetic compounds. but looking for other suggestions on popular, recreational synthetics and humans. Even invitro or animal research on synthetics is relevant that u think is important to add.

Thanks for suggestions
 
Last edited:
I'm going to be supplying information/guidance on a "designer drug" (we like to call them RCs) news story being done by a major cable network. I'm being used on account of both my academic and not-so-academic areas of interest.

It could be worth mentioning www.maps.org in your materials as they seem to do a good work in harm reduction as well as researching therapeutic applications of psychedelic drugs.
Good luck!
 
try to have them not use the words "bath salts", if they do make sure that they know what they are talking about. if "molly" or "ecstasy" is mentioned, make sure to let them know that should mean MDMA/MDA. bring up testing kits, and groups like dancesafe and the bunk police if that is possible.

i dont know how interested they would be since it isnt as popular or trendy as "molly" but not many people know that blotter has been adulterated more and more these days. might be worth mentioning the rise in 25i, DOx, 5-MeO-AMT, etc being laid on blotter. normal acid wont send you to the hospital barring a bad trip, those substances can kill you. there have probably been as many deaths from these RCs as much as from bad "molly".
 
try to have them not use the words "bath salts", if they do make sure that they know what they are talking about. if "molly" or "ecstasy" is mentioned, make sure to let them know that should mean MDMA/MDA. bring up testing kits, and groups like dancesafe and the bunk police if that is possible.

i dont know how interested they would be since it isnt as popular or trendy as "molly" but not many people know that blotter has been adulterated more and more these days. might be worth mentioning the rise in 25i, DOx, 5-MeO-AMT, etc being laid on blotter. normal acid wont send you to the hospital barring a bad trip, those substances can kill you. there have probably been as many deaths from these RCs as much as from bad "molly".

yes, blotter imitating as lsd will be a major point. seeing kids at festivals taking massive doses of molly and some random tab they think is acid to facilitate a candy flip is just dangerous
 
Consider the fact that (unfortunately) no matter how many facts you give and how what you say is truth, there will always be people watching who will not agree with you and will be hostile to the idea of any drug use. Since many of these closed minded types tend to be the ones who want to make the rules and laws, you should probably not mention any RC's by name if you want them to remain legal.

Media attention is the main thing that get these things banned. That, and irresponsible kids.

My main points would be: 1) People are going to keep using drugs no matter what.
2) Those who choose to do drugs need to educate themselves (which is easier than ever before thanks to the internet.)
 
Last edited:
I think that the activity of finding and creating new drugs is similar to the activity of finding and creating new sports, like paddle boarding using a surf board and a paddle, or flyboarding (using a jetski power boat water jet exhaust to fly over a lake or river while balancing standing up)

Life is full of adventures, and some are conceptual, emotional and sensual... the designer drug activity has to do with finding interesting things to do with the increasing amount of spare time that people have.

We do not have to get a jetski flyboard, and we do not have to get any chems unless that is what we personally are interested in.
 
Top