Ham-milton
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Messages
- 5,738
I've been trying to post this thread for 4 or 5 days now, so hopefully it'll work.
It won't let me post a link for some reason, so I've copied the abstract into here. The full text version is available for free online, however. I can't get into the .pdf, though, so my question may be answered in there and I'm just not able to get into it.
basically, "does anyone think that these might have recreational value? I would think that these would be weak agonists, and possibly weak partial agonists, the general requirement for recreational cannabinoids to be good. Or would they have too much adrenergic activity?"
Biochem J. 2000 November 1; 351(Pt 3): 817–824.
here's the link to the astract. It won't let me copy that in here either.
It won't let me post a link for some reason, so I've copied the abstract into here. The full text version is available for free online, however. I can't get into the .pdf, though, so my question may be answered in there and I'm just not able to get into it.
basically, "does anyone think that these might have recreational value? I would think that these would be weak agonists, and possibly weak partial agonists, the general requirement for recreational cannabinoids to be good. Or would they have too much adrenergic activity?"
Biochem J. 2000 November 1; 351(Pt 3): 817–824.
here's the link to the astract. It won't let me copy that in here either.
