My Theory of the Universe

Disclaimer: please note that I have never studied physics, quantum physics, math or anything that I am talking about here. If this theory doesn't make sense that is probably why. I am not educated in these topics but find them fascinating.

Everything is energy. Nothing is solid, nothing is "matter"--just look at "matter" under a powerful microscope and you see it is made up of other tiny particles. Magnify those particles and you will see that they are made of even tinier particles. Nothing is truly "solid." Everything is energy and is constantly in a state of motion and change even if it appears solid and stable.

Math dictates what happens to energy. Everything is a mathmatical equation. There is nothing that happens randomly. There are always equations that logically explain everything that happens. It is not always apparent to us the cause of every event because the equations that go into moving energy happen not only on a grand and obvious scale but also on a sub-atomic scale that we cannot percieve.

Basically I am talking about cause and effect. Everything is cause and effect. Even though we cannot always percieve the cause becuase we cannot see things that happen on a sub-atomic or cellular or tiny-particle level without the aid of powerful tools.

If we could see all the mathmatical equations that go into how energy is moved then we could predict and manipulate the future. Mere humans are not capable of such perception however.

That is my theory. I am not saying this is fact or this is definately how the universe works, but I'm saying there is a strong possibility that this theory has some merit. Let me know what you think.

 

Not sure where you are going but i get what you are trying to say. In quantum theory if we could plot all matter and its current direction we could account to the beginning and end of the universe but we as sentient beings throw a proverbial wrench in the machine because simply knowing every ones origin and direction is not nearly enough to predict much of anything. (also you might mean "matter" is never truly solid. energy is just excited matter so everything is matter. with the exception of waves which require matter to exist.) Im not a scientist either btw so my reason is bound to be as flawed as the next.

 

E=mc2.... Kinda explains it all. If it wasnt for this radical formula, life would be much,much different. Of course Hiroshima nd Nagasaki wouldn't have been obliterated (a direct result of this formula) . This most famous equation unlocked the atomic age. And what is great is it's totally provable. Energy= mass x the speed of light squared( speed of light is 186000 miles per second!) also I wouldn't have a job! ( I work in nuke physics) specifically, Radiation Protection, great field for a dope head! But I like whT you've written and it seems that while not being educated in those fields, your brain thinks in those ways. Quantum mechanics is uber fascinating. Hit me up and we can talk more. I can answer questions or just kick around ideas!

Thanks,
Archie

 

Whats even more amazing about mass-energy equivalence is that as it stands, "mass" and "energy" are pure signifiers...By that I mean that they signify nothing in themselves.

"It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount. -Richard Feynman"

And also the existence of Light gave way to many difficulties on the relationship between mass, matter, and energy that had existed post-Newton. But the fact that this mathematical equation doesn't signify anything other than a relationship between two concepts that can then be relatable to other concepts..even to concepts that may make ours totally outdated, makes it so that we have the world on our hands.

Everything is energy and is constantly in a state of motion and change even if it appears solid and stable.

Heraclitus would agree with you ["..constantly in a state of motion"] and Parmenides/Zeno would disagree with you ["For that which is is "fixed and unchangeable"]...

If everything is in a state of change, then it would change from what it is, to what it is not...And how can it change to what it is not if its entire attribute is that it is (Sorry if I'm making you confused)....this is what I'm talking about when i state that Energy in itself means nothing unless associated with another concept.

Being in a state of motion implies that it moved from point A to point B....but this betrays preconceptions on our notion of space. If we imagine a coordinate plane where the point is at x = 0 and its destination is x= 1 [y=0], it first has to go to x = .5, and before that it has to go to x = .25...and so on and so on, meaning that it would have an infinite tasks to complete in order for there to be movement.

Achilles can say that the turtle is "constantly in a state of motion", only because the turtle started before Achilles...just like it may appear that there is change only because it appears to be so by our human perception and our inherent tendency for structure...

But I do like your insistence of mathematics...even Badiou stated that Mathematics is the study of Being (that which is) and he made an entire philosophy based on that (I'm currently attempting to read "Being and Event"..in my opinion the best Book on Philosophy released in this millennium so far)...When he says "the one is not", he is echoing your comment that "Nothing is solid, nothing is "matter"--just look at "matter" under a powerful microscope and you see it is made up of other tiny particles. Magnify those particles and you will see that they are made of even tinier particles. Nothing is truly "solid."...the fact that it appears to be so is based on a mental operation [the count-as-one]. But when we say that everything is in a state of flux, we fall back to the notion of "the one is"...For in any talk of change, it is that this (this entity) became another (not this entity) which contradicts the characteristics that this entity had.

If im in the wrong, then I welcome any commentary, but all in all it shows that psychedelics are not bringing us forward, but propelling us backward into Pre-Socratic thought, which is by itself avant-garde.

 

So you really mean: Everything happens for a reason. ? Sorry sober.

 

mau5 - i agree, but wanted to say what Pindar did, in ways -- everything is matter, but not solid until so much refinement has taken place that all is left is a quite similar to any-other, micromicromicroscopic little particle.

i also dont believe in numbers so much the way we perceive them. numeral divination though, is what we are...and everything else...1 is always two, two plus two is always three, three plus another is always five, as long as we are viewing and making discrepancies here...we are a simple gloating factor, mere remainders amongst pure numerals....

i also strongly believe, that before the rule of gravity, there is the law of inertia. gravity is a denoted "form" of inertia; inertia is the quantum essence of gravity...in my twisted lil brain!!!

 

I have never heard an someone describe it better. Well done!

 

I really LOVE this. You have a beautiful mind.