My big mouth mum was right - drugs DID ruin my life: Julie Myerson's son on life 18

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Daily Mail Sunday 4th Sept

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1308898/My-big-mouth-mum-right--drugs-DID-ruin-life-Julie-Myersons-son-18-months-thrown-home.html

Tall, self-confident and arrestingly good looking, Jake Myerson is no shrinking violet.
And yet, 18 months after becoming the poster boy for dope-smoking teenage rebellion, he still finds the fact that people know so much about his life excruciatingly uncomfortable.
When Jake's mother, the Booker-nominated novelist Julie Myerson, laid bare his drug use and the family battles which ensued because of it in her hugely controversial non-fiction work The Lost Child, she couldn't possibly have anticipated the media furore she unleashed.

Revelations: Jake Myerson has patched up his relationship with his parents after mother Julie published a warts-and-all book based on his taking drugs
No detail of Jake's life was spared: how he stole money from his family, how he rowed and physically fought with his parents and how they came to the decision to throw their 17-year-old son out of their home for good.
Even more galling for Jake was that his 50-year-old mother, a doyenne of the chattering classes, only told him of his starring role in her new oeuvre when it was already finished.
When the book was published in March last year, Jake found himself caught up in the inevitable media firestorm, fanned by interviews with his mother and father.
Not only did he accuse them of exaggerating his 'addiction' to marijuana, but he also spelt out just how furious he was to have this deeply troubled period of his young life aired so publicly.
Branding his parents 'insane', 'naïve' and prone, at times, to fantasy, he stated: 'In the book she has taken the very worst years of my life and cleverly blended it into a work of art, and that to me is obscene.'
Nothing has been heard of Jake since. Julie, meanwhile, has also been unusually quiet.
So, 18 months on, and a good deal of water under the bridge later, what has been the fall-out from this most public of spats?

...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is so not the conclusion anyone who read the article would come to. He said A. He had reached out to his parents and extended the olive branch. B. Quit "Skunk" after realizing that it had caused his life to grow static C. Was still quite bitter with his mom for invading his privacy.

So he realized drugs weren't as benign as he thought they were, fine, that's a perfectly reasonable conclusion to make. But it's a far cry from my mum was right drugs did ruin my life. What ruined his life was being kicked out of home, and having to give up school even though he was an A student. Ugh, I hate the guardian, and it's readers should be counted, and have their ability to vote for public officials reduced by half. So that a normal non mentally deficient person would vote for candidate A, while the idiot house Frau who reads "journalism" from the guardian votes for candidate B. The tally would be candidate A 1 vote, candidate B 1/2 vote. Seriously Britain it's something to think about. I won't charge you for the idea.
 
If i was this kid and i thought my mother deserved it i would take her to court using the book as evidence for throwing him out while a minor. You can't technically do that until they are 18 i believe. If your underage kid is enough of a fuckup that you want to kick them out, fucking deal with it. You raised them, so who's to blame that they became a fuckup.....?


Hence why i don't want kids lol.
 
His mother is low. She's in the book industry. She knows tell-all drugs stories sell great. In fact, they're usually best-sellers straight out the gate if they have a good PR firm behind them. And she used her son as her book material. Wait, she used her under-age son as her book material. I wouldn't be surprised if she kicked him out of the house to make the story a bit more dramatic.

All authors struggle with what to reveal and what not to reveal about their family, friends and lovers. Most who have any sort of solid ethics choose to restate their characters as fiction or allow some time to pass until the wounds of the interactions are less fresh. In her case, talking to her son about what she was writing, then writing it as a novel sometime down the road would certainly have been better choices.

I cannot imagine exploiting my child the way she did her son. It's fucking foul. But Im sure she's still raking in the cash on this one. What a fucking whore. Actually, pimp would be more accurate. She pimped her son for her career. Nice.
 
Eugh. Is this another silly bitch like Debra Bell of Daily Mail and http://www.talkingaboutcannabis.com fame?

Your son is fucked up "addicted" to "killer skunkabis".

You know what'll really help? Why don't you kick him out. Yeah. That'll help.

Fuck, shit like that pisses me off so much.

There's an awesome blog called talking crap about cannabis (think it's down at the moment) but it serves as a strong rebuttal to all the bullshit Debra spouts on her talkingaboutcannabis website.
 
Ugh, I hate the guardian

I'm not 100% sure, but I have a slight suspicion you might have newspaper names mixed up there because kinda sorta I doubt a little you hate the guardian =D

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/sep/05/portugal-drugs-debate

Also, that is one caring mother lol. But then again it wouldn't really surprise me if her son just played along with his mother to increase sales either.
 
So he realized drugs weren't as benign as he thought they were, fine, that's a perfectly reasonable conclusion to make. But it's a far cry from my mum was right drugs did ruin my life. What ruined his life was being kicked out of home, and having to give up school even though he was an A student. Ugh, I hate the guardian, and it's readers should be counted, and have their ability to vote for public officials reduced by half. So that a normal non mentally deficient person would vote for candidate A, while the idiot house Frau who reads "journalism" from the guardian votes for candidate B. The tally would be candidate A 1 vote, candidate B 1/2 vote. Seriously Britain it's something to think about. I won't charge you for the idea.

This would be much more beneficial if it was done with regards to the Daily Fail, the Sun, the Mirror and the Torygraph.

FAR more beneficial!
 
"More youngsters are being treated in the USA for marijuana addiction than for alcohol. Anxiety, depression, apathy, decline in academic performance, negative impact on cognition, and opting out are all common among young cannabis users."

"Think prevention: cannabis is the drug most young people begin with, and we know that its use can lead onto harder drugs, there is evidence it primes the brain for harder drugs, so preventing use is vital."

Wow, this lady should have her mouth sewn shut.

"Signs of Cannabis use"

Weight/appetite loss.
Keeping arms covered.
Blood on sheets.
Dilated pupils are a physical sign that is pretty fool-proof for parents, and evidence of Optrex in bags and pockets is one to look out for. (Unlike heroin where pupils go smaller, cannabis causes pupils to grow bigger)."

WTF.

All from her site:


EDIT: Read the Your Stories section for some laughs. xD
 
Last edited:
It seems like a lot of the problems caused by his "addiction" were due to the stigma attached to the deadly marihuana and his mum being such a massive cunt? Or am I interpreting the article incorrectly?
 
It seems like a lot of the problems caused by his "addiction" were due to the stigma attached to the deadly marihuana and his mum being such a massive cunt? Or am I interpreting the article incorrectly?

No, that's pretty much spot on.
 
Reading some of those 'your stories' is mental, those kids were blatantly taking much more than weed.

(Theres one who claims she came home to her sun all wrapped up in blankets staring at the wall..)
 
"Signs of Cannabis use"

Weight/appetite loss.
Keeping arms covered.
Blood on sheets.
Dilated pupils are a physical sign that is pretty fool-proof for parents, and evidence of Optrex in bags and pockets is one to look out for. (Unlike heroin where pupils go smaller, cannabis causes pupils to grow bigger)."

WTF.

This is so bizarre I'm having trouble making fun of it. I don't know what to say besides WTF? This is a special breed of stupid. British drug media consistently outstrips the US media in sheer retardation and that's saying something.

Anybody check out that new Radiohead song called "Daily Mail"? funny stuff.
 
is this an ignoramus aimed tabloid similar to the 'Inquirer' that huge, lumpy women buy at grocery store checkout lines.

the whole of this thread is ridiculous . US media can outstrip this lame brained piece and that's throwing down on you Brits (_l_)
 
Top