Mike has his two-pennorth at the guardian today. He told you he would...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/apr/26/hidden-dangers-of-legal-highs
First thing you notice is the scare-mongering "Soaraway Sun" tabloid title - "The Hidden dangers.." not "Millions of people use these and 99.99% are fine..". As you'd expect he starts off listing alleged deaths and health scares they've caused. Then seems to contradict himself by making the point that "All the deaths attributed to mephedrone years ago were fake.." (but all the ones attributed to Nbomes nowadays arn't fake...right?)
Then he mentions classic MDMA-style so called "research". Example, "We injected a massive amount of cemfetamine directly into a slice of a rat brain and "it seemed to twitch". Not "We gave a live rat an oral dose of camfetamine, exactly equivalent to how a human would take it reaching similar concentrations in the brain, and...er...absolutely nothing happened and it lived a perfectly healthy life". That kind of useful research would be boring wouldn't it?
Then right at the very end, when everyone has stopped reading, he mentions a few positive things like methoxetamine curing a guys depression and that mushrooms are far safer - failing to mention that mushrooms were legal for a few years from 2004-2007.
So there you have it. Does anyone recognise anything they said to Mike in an interview?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/apr/26/hidden-dangers-of-legal-highs
First thing you notice is the scare-mongering "Soaraway Sun" tabloid title - "The Hidden dangers.." not "Millions of people use these and 99.99% are fine..". As you'd expect he starts off listing alleged deaths and health scares they've caused. Then seems to contradict himself by making the point that "All the deaths attributed to mephedrone years ago were fake.." (but all the ones attributed to Nbomes nowadays arn't fake...right?)
Then he mentions classic MDMA-style so called "research". Example, "We injected a massive amount of cemfetamine directly into a slice of a rat brain and "it seemed to twitch". Not "We gave a live rat an oral dose of camfetamine, exactly equivalent to how a human would take it reaching similar concentrations in the brain, and...er...absolutely nothing happened and it lived a perfectly healthy life". That kind of useful research would be boring wouldn't it?
Then right at the very end, when everyone has stopped reading, he mentions a few positive things like methoxetamine curing a guys depression and that mushrooms are far safer - failing to mention that mushrooms were legal for a few years from 2004-2007.
So there you have it. Does anyone recognise anything they said to Mike in an interview?

