• CD Moderators: someguyontheinternet
  • Cannabis Discussion Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules

[MEGA]Methods of Smoking

What method of smoking is your favourite?

  • Joint (pure cannabis rolled in a paper)

    Votes: 32 10.1%
  • Spliff (cannabis/tobacco mix rolled in a paper)

    Votes: 34 10.8%
  • Blunt (cannabis rolled in a tobacco wrap)

    Votes: 33 10.4%
  • Bowl (traditional pipe)

    Votes: 52 16.5%
  • Bong (water pipe)

    Votes: 100 31.6%
  • Waterfall/bucket/gravity bong

    Votes: 7 2.2%
  • Vaporiser

    Votes: 47 14.9%
  • Hot-knives

    Votes: 2 0.6%
  • Other (please specify in post)

    Votes: 9 2.8%

  • Total voters
    316
When you look at my nick, you KNOW what I like. Joints baby! Jowever, I almost never get to smoke them because its hard for me to smoke a whole day's worth of weed in one sitting. So, my bong and my spoon pipe get the heaviest traffic.
 
Spliffs at the moment. I enjoy the whole ritual of relaxing, rolling up and smoking a joint, but I have a low tolerance and like to conserve my weed, so I normally do a 50:50 tobacco/weed mix with some kief sprinkled in for good measure.
 
I have tryed cyclones. Prerolled flavored blunts with no tobacco. They come in a tube and they have a little straw so you can push your herb down in there. I also like the small pipes called chillums because its a small bowl that you can light just like a cigarette. Both of these methods work for other herbs as well. The chillum worked really well with the blue lotus. I am not a good roller, probably wouldnt have the paitence to learn how to roll. A water bong feels to advanced at this point for me to.
 
lightbulb vaporizer, hands down. if youre looking for efficiency, this is the way to go. in combination with a glass bowl for the vapebud, you get a good 90+ percent of your pot... barely any is wasted. also the great part about it is when youre dry, you can resort to the leftovers that condensate on your pieces(with extended use). in the vaporizer pen tube, it clogs up with goo that is comparable to hash. stick a screwdriver through it and then smear it on some bible paper and vape it up, you get wicked high. i also heat up some rubbing alcohol in a paper in the microwave then pour some in the bulb and in my pipe and shake vigourously, then dump the black stuff onto a plate. light it on fire so all the liquid evaporates then scrap up whats left on the plate. that stuff isnt hash its just pretty much resin/tar, but it gets you high. but yea this is the best way to ingest thc, im a serious stoner.
 
Bong Water: Cold vs. Hot

If the goal is to filter out the most toxins, what is the optimal temperature?

IIRC from chemistry, the solubility of most gases increases as the water gets colder, but I'm not sure if this applies to the most harmful gases produced by cannabis combustion.
 
the point of a bong is that you can take fat rips from ti cause its smoother....hot water would make it less smooth.......
 
LSDMDMA&9478814 said:
the point of a bong is that you can take fat rips from ti cause its smoother....hot water would make it less smooth.......

No, the point of a bong is to filter the marijuana smoke.
 
If you're that concerned about your health you shouldnt be smoking anything period.
The point of a bong is that the hit is smoother so you can get higher from taking bigger hits
nobodys liek
"I USE A BONG SO ITS HEALTHY FOR ME!!111"
 
LSDMDMA&9478860 said:
If you're that concerned about your health you shouldnt be smoking anything period.
The point of a bong is that the hit is smoother so you can get higher from taking bigger hits
nobodys liek
"I USE A BONG SO ITS HEALTHY FOR ME!!111"

I never said anything about health. The point of a bong is to filter and cool the smoke. The smoke inhaled from a bong has a higher THC concentration than smoking without water filtration. Stop making yourself look like an idiot.
 
naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
However, a 2000 NORML-MAPS study found that "water pipes filter out more psychoactive THC than they do other tars, thereby requiring users to smoke more to reach their desired effect".[8] In the study, smoke from cannabis supplied by the NIDA was drawn through a number of smoking devices and analyzed. An inhalation machine, adjusted to mimic the puff length of cannabis smokers, drew smoke through a standard bong, a small portable bong with a folding stem, a bong with a motorized paddle that thoroughly mixes the smoke with the water, and two different types of vaporizers. Comparisons to traditional non-filtered smoking methods were not included in these experiments.

kthnxbai
 
I never said anything about health. The point of a bong is to filter and cool the smoke. The smoke inhaled from a bong has a higher THC concentration than smoking without water filtration. Stop making yourself look like an idiot.



Incorrectamundo.... according to a study or two done on the subject, at least.



And I swear, TearItDown, I am NOT following you from thread to thread just to contradict you. I do my best not to let one thread leak into another. =D



http://www.ukcia.org/research/pipes.php

^^Take that link with a grain of salt, though, because there's so few legitimate research reports on the subject. I, however, trust NORML and MAPS to do everything honestly because... well... that's their approach. The second these organizations or those similar start to fudge facts they'll be viewed as equally propagandist to the governmental garbage spewing around the globe, which would completely discredit everything they try to work for.
 
You ninja'd in before I posted. The arrows were referring to TearItDown, but in the time it took me to throw together my post you had squeezed in between mine and his.


I've edited it to make it more clear. ^_^
 
Incorrectamundo.... according to a study or two done on the subject, at least.



And I swear, TearItDown, I am NOT following you from thread to thread just to contradict you. I do my best not to let one thread leak into another. =D



http://www.ukcia.org/research/pipes.php

^^Take that link with a grain of salt, though, because there's so few legitimate research reports on the subject. I, however, trust NORML and MAPS to do everything honestly because... well... that's their approach. The second these organizations or those similar start to fudge facts they'll be viewed as equally propagandist to the governmental garbage spewing around the globe, which would completely discredit everything they try to work for.

You are trying to use data against my argument which are not relevant. This study illustrates the Cannabinoid/Tar Ratio of different smoking methods. I am simply speaking about the concentration of THC in the smoke. Not about the tar ratio. aka, how high you're getting.
 
The smoke inhaled from a bong has a higher THC concentration than smoking without water filtration.

and then


You are trying to use data against my argument which are not relevant. This study illustrates the Cannabinoid/Tar Ratio of different smoking methods. I am simply speaking about the concentration of THC in the smoke. Not about the tar ratio. aka, how high you're getting.




Actually, if water filters out ANY psychoactives whatsoever then the THC concentration of weed smoke passing through a water-filtration device will be less than non-filtered smoke. That's my line of thinking anyways, which admittedly can be flawed at times.
 
and then







Actually, if water filters out ANY psychoactives whatsoever then the THC concentration of weed smoke passing through a water-filtration device will be less than non-filtered smoke. That's my line of thinking anyways, which admittedly can be flawed at times.

My logic comes from the fact that the same amount of weed in a joint/blunt will increase the effects of your high tremendously if used in a bong. Seems backwards to compare how high you are, I know... -.-
But from a chemical standpoint, you are decreasing the amount of other shit in the smoke, thereby increasing the THC concentration per volume of smoke.
 
Top