Medical Marijuana Is Far From Medicine

23536

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 16, 2010
Messages
7,725
Location
Stop resisting!
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-nehring/medical-marijuana-is-far-_b_3084491.html

Protecting children and vulnerable adults from the destruction substance abuse can cause should not be a partisan issue. In fact, saving a generation from the scourge of addictive drugs is going to require effective government policy, private sector ingenuity, and leaders of both major parties.

That's why I've teamed up with former Democrat Congressman Patrick Kennedy and conservative author David Frum to support a new initiative to protect young people from drugs and roll back recent advances by groups seeking to expand drug use through legalization.

For me, this is a deeply personal issue. For seven years I lived with my two parents while they were helpless against the addictions that had befallen them. The destruction of their physical health, their mental and emotional capacity, and our family is something I never want to see happen to anyone else.

No one sets out with the goal of developing a substance abuse problem, but it occurs when vulnerability, availability, and permissibility all meet. In fact, the National Institutes of Health report that 1 in 6 people who try marijuana as a kid even once will become addicted to it. Marijuana affects young people in particular ways, hindering their intellectual capacity and school performance, as well as their motivation.

Drugs like marijuana are not like typical goods in a marketplace, or even like the pot that became popularized in the 1960s. Today's marijuana is far more powerful, more addictive, and causes more mental and physical damage than ever before -- in fact, today's marijuana is about 5-6 times stronger than it was in the 1960s and 1970s. And too many Americans are using it, with devastating results.

Project SAM (Smart Approaches to Marijuana) is a response to the lavishly funded efforts by a variety of groups -- including billionaire financier George Soros, Progressive Insurance founder Peter Lewis, and University of Phoenix founder John Sperling to expand marijuana use by redefining the drug as "medicine," removing its negative social stigma, and grow its acceptance.

Although often mocked pro-marijuana advocates, Nancy Reagan's 1980s "Just Say No" campaign proved extremely effective in reminding parents and children alike of how to respond to opportunities to take drugs. Unfortunately, "Just Say No" has been slowly replaced by "medical marijuana" as the dominant framework in public policy debate. Marijuana, according to these activists, is just "medicine."

But it's not. We have a process in America for approving new medicines, one that has been supported by Republicans and Democrats alike for a hundred years. And whole, smoked marijuana consistently fails to meet the test. Smoked cannabis, it turns out, is not medicine. We don't need to derive whatever therapeutic benefit it might have by smoking it any more than we need to smoke opium to get the effect of morphine.

cont. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ron-nehring/medical-marijuana-is-far-_b_3084491.html
 
Its true that todays marijuana is generally a lot more strong than that of yesteryear; but 5-6 times sounds a bit high.

There is no evidence I'm aware of which concludes that Reagan's campaign was effective.

The author clearly doesn't recognize the main risk of marijuana: that of exacerbating and/or producing psychosis, which can lead to a whole host of other mental problems. Marijuana has the potential for addiction, but even strict conservatives admit that its less addictive than alcohol and tobacco.

Marijuana is so available because society recognizes it as a fairly benign substance (which I don't, but that's beside the point); and most importantly, because its illegal.

I think the problem is that there are two main powers which each have a radical stance on marijuana. One states that its simply a harmless medicine, while the other identifies it as a unilaterally very damaging substance which could bring about a host of mental problems and the downfall of society. We need to find the middle-ground, understanding that for some people using marijuana poses a very severe risk to their health, while conceding that for others its been nothing but good, and of course those (I would argue: most of us) who fall within these two extremes.

I agree though, that we need to isolate the valuable constituents in marijuana and utilize them in specific proportions to help all kinds of mental and physical disorders on a pharmaceutical level. Until then, people will use marijuana.
 
Today's marijuana is far more powerful, more addictive, and causes more mental and physical damage than ever before -- in fact, today's marijuana is about 5-6 times stronger than it was in the 1960s and 1970s. And too many Americans are using it, with devastating results.

Bullshit IMO. And what's wrong with a stronger product? Think of it like hard liquor compared to beer. Ugh.

Marijuana is so available because society recognizes it as a fairly benign substance (which I don't, but that's beside the point); and most importantly, because its illegal.

Very true. In fact, once people perceive cannabis to be fairly benign, and notice it's a schedule I substance, they start to think any/all drugs must also be benign, or that the government has little/no reason to restrict any/all drugs (which is a very harmful assumption to make).

But in general it makes the whole idea of drugs being illegal seem not so bad, once you think about acquiring/using cannabis illegally, the idea of using other drugs in the same fashion becomes really accessible and you don't think twice about it.
 
In fact, once people perceive cannabis to be fairly benign, and notice it's a schedule I substance, they start to think any/all drugs must also be benign, or that the government has little/no reason to restrict any/all drugs (which is a very harmful assumption to make).

But in general it makes the whole idea of drugs being illegal seem not so bad, once you think about acquiring/using cannabis illegally, the idea of using other drugs in the same fashion becomes really accessible and you don't think twice about it.

So it is a gateway drug! I knew it!
 
The article - from what I've read, which I must admit is limited to what what Numbers posted above - doesn't really address the issue of whether cannabis is medicine, despite the title. Very odd :?

It is basically a rant that tries to say "cannabis can be dangerous" .
While this is true, many, many medicines can be dangerous.

Cannabis is not the same type of medicine that the author talks about, with an approval process that is 100 years old. This is because cannabis is far, far older. The medicines that have been approved by this process are, probably without exception, patented, and make money for a single company. Cannabis is a natural plant that is millions of years old, and therefore cannot be patented.

Until 100 years ago, cannabis was a common medicine in the US and other countries.

So, the author's point only makes sense if you put on blinders to all of history, including the anti-cannabis campaign in the 1920's and 30's.
 
Last edited:
Top