• MDMA &
    Empathogenic
    Drugs

    Welcome Guest!
  • MDMA Moderators: Esperighanto

MDA 20 different routes of synthetic preparation equals different effects?

coleman318

coleman318

Bluelighter
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
119
There is a chemist somewhere in *snip* who synthesizes MDA. He currently has only made a handful of batches, but each time its a clean absolute white fluff powder. Each batch has a different effect to a certain extent. I have a couple questions concerning these thoughts. Is it possible to have a complete white powder of MDA and still not be 90%+ pure? Somehow through rinse / wash techniques? Anyways I hear a lot of talk about how its hallucinogenic compared to MDMA. Even in pihkaL. I have a high tolerance to hallucinogens and weed so im wondering if this is one of the factors concerning my second question. This shit is sk potent and strong I don't even want to give it to anyone unless someone who has taken it is around. If you take anymore than a point (100mg) at once, you will puke your fucking brains out. I would have 150mg in 1 capsule and spread my dosage in 2 separate 75 mg spaced 45 min apart. I would be rolling so hard, each sip of beer or toke of weed sent me into a deep breathing state of euphoria where it was hard to finish a glass of beer in an hour. Now I know this shit is not cut, looking under a microscope its a bunch of snow flakes shaped differently but the same style. Thread question comes up, do people notice a difference in effects batch to batch? are some batches more psychedelic than others? I've only taken MDA 3 times, but nothing more visual than MDMA, I actually would say the good MDMA I used to get gave me way blurrier vision. This MDA feels like a euphoric chest rush. Anyways I don't know if im used to tripping so much that MDA puts me in a zone where im just having a good time and the side effects of tripping aren't very noticable since im used to tripping hard? Any opinions are welcome.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've had like 5 different batches of MD** and each time they produced slightly different highs, the last batch I had seems to be very similar to yours (I think it might be MDA), I've never spewed from MD** before even when I took 350mg in 1 dose (and it wasn't shit could still get fucked up on 150 easy), but just the other day I had 150mg of this new stuff and I was at a concert, I spewed my ring up and I could only lay down on the grass, the paramedics even came over to me to see if I was alright lol, I didn't notice really any visual effects from it other then a huge buzz, there also didn't appear to be much empathy (if any). There are slightly different ways to synth it and I suppose they bring different effects, I'm not sure about the hallucination effects of MDA though.
 
Set & setting? Especially with only 3 tries I would be reluctant to rule out set & setting. Impurities? Surely with ~20 different routes there has to be some precursor(s) that leave white powdery impurities behind? With vendor bought batches you won't know what's in them unless tested, they could even be cut with trace amounts of other, more potent and cheaper chems.

I find the idea very interesting however, that there could be distinguishable differences in a chemicals pharmacology depending on how it was made. That could imply that there is something quite substantial that we don't quite yet understand about physics/chemistry. Sadly, I am very sceptical also. It could be that these different techniques produce different ratios of different isomers for example which could explain some variation between batches.
 
I like where you are going with that, true 3 dosages isn't quite enough for an accurate say. But also i know it's coming from the cook directly and the last few batches he has put names to the effects. example, pumped. More intense body load that his previous 4 batches. I also have no clue if he is using the same route of synthesis batch to batch or what. Seems like set and setting has almost just as much impact, maybe i haven't been in a good environment to put me in the zone where i will get to see MDA fully shine. I just know it's hard to find good drugs these days especially something that has zero adulterants. At the moment i find MDA just like MDMA. I felt like a moderate dose would be stimulating but when you take higher doses you are couch locked for sure.
 
I do not know for sure, that is a great point. I'm just assuming since the guy I'm going through is buying from the chemist directly, that the chemist would take pride in his work and would want to be honest with the product he is presenting. If there are ways to distinguish the difference without a test kit, I'll be more than happy to take a gander. Can you use those other chemicals as a substituted precursor to MDMA? That would be legit as fuck, but since MDA is a precursor to one of the most popular drugs, I'm sure that is the chemical in abundance. Making it likely that it is in fact, MDA.
 
Last edited:
Same molecule, same effect. MDA and MDMA are a bit psychedelic. Your mood and the setting will effect the way they feel. Nothing to do with the batch as anything left in wouldn't be psychoactive. And you don't "cook" MDA lol
 
Ya it felt weird saying cook instead of synthesize, been watching too much Breaking Bad haha
 
isomer? NEVERMIND, FORGET I SAID ANYTHING. since we all know it's IMPOSSIBLE to get chiral reagents or L-DOPA, so it must be the case that NOBODY ever does it like that. (internet sarcasm implied). point: no way of knowing, but no way of knowing it ISN'T synthed as individual isomers. A guy with an advanced degree and actual experience could find and carry out a million different methods of skinning that cat.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top