Mass Spectrometry Tracks Down Designer Drugs

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
C&EN

By Erika Gebel
June 15, 2012

With reader comments



Drug tests spot banned substances based on their specific chemical structures, but a new breed of narcotics is designed to evade such tests. Now researchers have developed a method that can screen for multiple designer drugs at once, without knowing their structures (Anal. Chem., DOI: 10.1021/ac300509h). The test may help law enforcement crack down on the substances.

“Herbal incense” products sold in gas stations and on the internet are typically spiked with synthetic cannabinoids, a class of designer drugs, says Megan Grabenauer of RTI International. When smoked, these compounds produce a high just as their chemical forebear, tetrahydrocannabinol, better known as THC, does. The Drug Enforcement Agency has banned some synthetic cannabinoids, such as JWH-018. But the scientific literature contains recipes for hundreds of synthetic cannabinoids with different, yet related chemical structures. Every time a new test catches one, designer-drug makers can just move on to the next.

More...
http://cen.acs.org/articles/90/web/2012/06/Mass-Spectrometry-Tracks-Down-Designer.html
 
interesting none the less!
probably won't due much to speed up the discovery to ban process though

having better knowledge about what chemicals are actually in those blends will be a good thing, imo.
 
This seems to me a really trivial paper once you have a GC/MS. All they've done is figure out the mass shifts of adding or subtracting things off of JWH-018 - something that can be done on paper.

There is a nice little table in there with the anlysis of various "herbal incenses". Apparently JWH-018 predominates.
 
Yeah, the science looks to be trivial, and it can only detect very similar analogs, that differ by only 1 atom or so. Mass defect analysis is well known in MS. The clever thing is that they probably managed to get grant funding from the DEA for it.8)
 
^Isn't exploiting the ignorance of people with money by convincing them you are offering them something they want even when you aren't how grant writing works? I don't have the chemistry knowledge to be agreeing independently that this is an instance of that, but that seems to be how it works elsewhere in academia. Whatever. If it bleeds the DEA, godspeed.
 
Top