Mr. Krinkle
Bluelight Crew
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2005
- Messages
- 29,424
they don't have any rednecks in those states - that's the common denominator
Lol, rednecks are everywhere. Hillbillies are localized to Appalachia though. That's my interpretation of the definition anyway.they don't have any rednecks in those states - that's the common denominator
He’s not wrong…more laws for the shooter to break, not stop him![]()
Ben Shapiro writing out an entire paragraph while also saying literally nothing... such a tool
but I guess it just sums up everything that will follow this incident in a pretty good way. Nothing.
And Abbot is going to be speaking at an NRA rally in a few days.so cute
it's an overly vague statement and there is "no evidence to support it" because it hasn't been tried before, we haven't tried new things... but that's not my pointHe’s not wrong…more laws for the shooter to break, not stop him
I think he’s saying more laws arnt the answer since if someone is willing to commit murder then they will break any gun law..what do you suggest we try ?it's an overly vague statement and there is "no evidence to support it" because it hasn't been tried before, we haven't tried new things... but that's not my point
my point was he's just saying overly obvious shit without giving any sort of potential solution, he's just sucking up to his fan base
he's a huge tool and always has been
I was just calling him a tool man, lol that was my whole point of posting thatI think he’s saying more laws arnt the answer since if someone is willing to commit murder then they will break any gun law..what do you suggest we try ?
History of School Shootings in the United States | K12 Academics
1700s The earliest known United States shooting to happen on school property was the Pontiac's Rebellion school massacre on July 26, 1764, where four Lenape American Indian entered the schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, shot and killed schoolmaster Enoch Brown, and killed...www.k12academics.com
What sort of sick and twisted society allows an 18 year old to buy automatic rifles, but makes that 18 year old wait another three years before he can buy a fuckin beer??
What gun shows don’t require a background check? Iv been to many many gun shows and never seen someone buy a gun no background check required..I assume your thinking of a private sale ? Most of which don’t happen at gun shows..but yes I think anytime a gun changed hands there should be a procedure the same as a sale from a licensed sellerAgreed. People scream and rant about any sort of suggestion that we should improve our gun control laws. It's being framed as "they're gonna take our guns", but most people are not trying to suggest that at all. We just need to have more regulation. Well adjusted adults should be able to buy guns, and they can. The problem is, there are so many loopholes it's laughable. Gun shows where no background checks or anything at all are required. Why is anyone against a background check? Why is it that a disturbed kid who was making Facebook posts threatening to shoot his grandma and shoot up a school could walk into a gun store and buy a gun? That's absurd.
I agree guns aren't the problem, the problem is our society and the sickness that is spreading through it. The problem is mental health. 99.99% of all gun owners will never shoot anyone with it, and don't wish to. Those people should be allowed to have guns. Suggesting that we do more extensive background checking on prospective buyers is sensible. We know that we have a bunch of disturbed kids (mostly kids) who want to shoot up schools and shit. With even a simple level of checking, this kid could have been identified as someone who should not be given a gun. But a whole lot of people are so afraid that any legislation at all means that the government is going to come to their door and take their guns away, that any suggestion is taken as an attempt to disarm us for nefarious purposes.
Guns aren't the problem, but we owe it to ourselves to try a little harder to prevent these things from happening. It is absurd that that kid was allowed to buy a gun, absurd that anyone can buy any sort of gun they please with little to no checking into them. I mean this guy was publicly stating on social media that he planned to shoot up that school.
While I agree with most of this post, as a person with mental illness I will argue that 99.99% of mentally ill people are harmless to society and keep their heads down and just want to live their lives and be left alone. I know the fad in the MSM and amongst conservatives is to blame it all on mental illness. Well being an evil sadistic fuck is not always a symptom of mental illness. I'm not saying some mass murderers aren't also mentally ill, but it prolly looks more like a venn diagram with a small sliver of overlap in the middle.Agreed. People scream and rant about any sort of suggestion that we should improve our gun control laws. It's being framed as "they're gonna take our guns", but most people are not trying to suggest that at all. We just need to have more regulation. Well adjusted adults should be able to buy guns, and they can. The problem is, there are so many loopholes it's laughable. Gun shows where no background checks or anything at all are required. Why is anyone against a background check? Why is it that a disturbed kid who was making Facebook posts threatening to shoot his grandma and shoot up a school could walk into a gun store and buy a gun? That's absurd.
I agree guns aren't the problem, the problem is our society and the sickness that is spreading through it. The problem is mental health. 99.99% of all gun owners will never shoot anyone with it, and don't wish to. Those people should be allowed to have guns. Suggesting that we do more extensive background checking on prospective buyers is sensible. We know that we have a bunch of disturbed kids (mostly kids) who want to shoot up schools and shit. With even a simple level of checking, this kid could have been identified as someone who should not be given a gun. But a whole lot of people are so afraid that any legislation at all means that the government is going to come to their door and take their guns away, that any suggestion is taken as an attempt to disarm us for nefarious purposes.
Guns aren't the problem, but we owe it to ourselves to try a little harder to prevent these things from happening. It is absurd that that kid was allowed to buy a gun, absurd that anyone can buy any sort of gun they please with little to no checking into them. I mean this guy was publicly stating on social media that he planned to shoot up that school.
Aww, wassamatta, you don't like my "left wing talking points?"
As for the "get them if they want" comment. Who but "right wingers" say things like that, as if nothing can be done to stop or at least curtail mass shootings? Not calling you a right winger but the way you are talking is, well, quack quack.
You may be through but you don't get to decide when I'm through.
The Australia talking point libs love to use is a bit disingenuous.
Think about it this way. Two renters see a roach in their kitchen one day. They both put out a bit of poison hoping to fix the problem. A month later, Apartment A is completely roach free while Apartment B is crawling with hundreds of them.
That's because the roach in Apartment A was by itself and crept in from outside. The roach in Apartment B was born in Apartment B. So was its parents and grandparents. There is a whole network and infrastructure of roaches in Apartment B. There's trash everywhere. The person who lives there is depressed and has been for decades, so they never clean. The landlord doesn't give a fuck either.