LSDMDMA&
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 12,829
potato said he was sure the flat ones were MDA
-
RT&DC Moderators: Senior Staff
light blue G ladys MDMA vs. MDA
- Thread starter Mashpotato03
- Start date
Pans-Advocate
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2009
- Messages
- 1,066
Depends on the shape/print of the pill. There have been 3 different and distinct G-lady presses in the past 6 months or so in that area. One was only ever seen in light blue, and looked like this: http://www.ecstasydata.org/view.php?id=1933 ... one was seen in blue and orange, and was really wide, thinner than most pills, and flat (it also had a "." next to the G): http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=24021 ... and one was orange last year, and has been seen in blue and lavender this year (it's thick and domed on both sides): http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=24045, http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=24048
I haven't heard of any red ones unless you're talking about the wide flat orange .G's.
In any case, I haven't actually seen a truly bunk (or piperazine) g-lady in your area, ever. Apparently there were some green ladies going around in the spring that were pipes, but the blue and lavender domed G-ladies that have come through most recently have been pretty excellent, and the wide flat ones have a great reputation as well.
However, this report on the red ladies: http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=24095 means that there ARE some bunk ladies around, and I just have been lucky enough not to see them among any of my friends.
Personally I have consumed a lavender G-lady (http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=24045) and I know that it is a very high quality pill, with perhaps some amphetamine adulteration (not enough to make you feel speedy unless you eat too many, but enough to keep you up for a little while after you come down ... I didn't mind, and I usually don't eat more than 1 1/2 over a night and I'm quite sensitive to speediness). I have also consumed the blue wide flat .G lady and the thick sharp-cornered light blue G-lady (the first ecstacydata link in this post) and they are also both legit, solid pills.
Stay away from the red ones that are domed on both sides ... I don't know anything about them personally but pillreports seems not to support them (the test results came up negative for MDMA). The others all seem to be fine.
I haven't heard of any red ones unless you're talking about the wide flat orange .G's.
In any case, I haven't actually seen a truly bunk (or piperazine) g-lady in your area, ever. Apparently there were some green ladies going around in the spring that were pipes, but the blue and lavender domed G-ladies that have come through most recently have been pretty excellent, and the wide flat ones have a great reputation as well.
However, this report on the red ladies: http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=24095 means that there ARE some bunk ladies around, and I just have been lucky enough not to see them among any of my friends.
Personally I have consumed a lavender G-lady (http://www.pillreports.com/index.php?page=display_pill&id=24045) and I know that it is a very high quality pill, with perhaps some amphetamine adulteration (not enough to make you feel speedy unless you eat too many, but enough to keep you up for a little while after you come down ... I didn't mind, and I usually don't eat more than 1 1/2 over a night and I'm quite sensitive to speediness). I have also consumed the blue wide flat .G lady and the thick sharp-cornered light blue G-lady (the first ecstacydata link in this post) and they are also both legit, solid pills.
Stay away from the red ones that are domed on both sides ... I don't know anything about them personally but pillreports seems not to support them (the test results came up negative for MDMA). The others all seem to be fine.
LSDMDMA&
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2010
- Messages
- 12,829
yeah the green g's up i posted abotu in this thread WERE pipes but other than that it doesnt look like the g's are adulterated.
rollingstoned!
Bluelighter
I had those in June, and they were MDA. I know that was 6 months ago, but the pic looks EXACTLY like the ones I had in June.
Pans-Advocate
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2009
- Messages
- 1,066
Actually, those were MDMA. http://www.ecstasydata.org/view.php?id=1933
I think a lot of people highly overestimate the amount of MDA that gets made and distributed. It takes more than just a reagent test to determine whether an MDxx pill is MDA or MDMA, and the only pill I've seen an MDA-positive lab test for in the US in the past two years was actually just one of the original white G-ladies, and a batch of those hasn't come out in years. I've heard a lot of people claim that their pills were MDA, but I have never actually seen lab-test evidence for the presence of MDA in any pill I've ever seen in this country (except those old white G-ladies).
Basically I just don't think MDA is made all that often, and most people who think they're eating MDA are actually just eating good old MDMA and assume that it's something different after experiencing some "out of the ordinary" effects that are more likely just the result of set and setting.
I think a lot of people highly overestimate the amount of MDA that gets made and distributed. It takes more than just a reagent test to determine whether an MDxx pill is MDA or MDMA, and the only pill I've seen an MDA-positive lab test for in the US in the past two years was actually just one of the original white G-ladies, and a batch of those hasn't come out in years. I've heard a lot of people claim that their pills were MDA, but I have never actually seen lab-test evidence for the presence of MDA in any pill I've ever seen in this country (except those old white G-ladies).
Basically I just don't think MDA is made all that often, and most people who think they're eating MDA are actually just eating good old MDMA and assume that it's something different after experiencing some "out of the ordinary" effects that are more likely just the result of set and setting.