Legalization of unlicenced peptides?

JohnBoy2000

Bluelighter
Joined
May 11, 2016
Messages
2,650


Strong advocacy coming in, apparent RFK is on board with the movement as well.

I've used mt2 in the past and it is life changing if you enjoy the sun but don't tan well.

The speaker here sings the praises of GHK-Cu, which I haven't tried but it sounds good, and then others for recovery.

I wouldn't even mind a little of the GLP1 peptides to lean out on some slight lipid dense areas, get that completely shredded look.

Recovery peptides like TB500 and BPC also sound good.

Seems to be a big movement, this peptide thing that's going on.

I would be nice if they were more readily available, given the apparent benefit they can provide?
 
Here's a good overview of peptide quality:



It'll be interesting to see how much comes out about the negative effects of GLP-1 use. It's a "protected" multibillion dollar market so expect plenty of positive propaganda and minimal realistic research on the negatives - a bit like statins and metformin which many people still consider beneficial.
 
Last edited:
I think it's hard to give clear cut suggestions on the safety profile of the common peptides due to lack of reliable data from users and also on quality of the substance. I think a good move would be large scale trials for people in the public to participate in and have long term tracking. There's a strong desire for the effects of these drugs so might as well cater to the audience and also get meaningful data.
 
I think this is sketchy AF. Of course if you do your research and know the safety profile of what you are ordering. RFK seems like the type to shill a whole 'fake health' full on snakeoil type of thing too though.

Be careful and understand what you put in your body is ultimately your responsibility (as always) and personally I think you should be able to put whatever you want in your body --- it is marketing it as "Health boosting" in any way that worries me
 
The only person with any credibility in those videos posted is Hamilton Morris.

Stephen Bartlett is a shameless grifting hack who regularly platforms the usual parade of other grifters, idiots and morons using fake science to sell shit, the fact that someone said something about peptides on his podcast means absolute fuck all.

RFK Jr.'s endorsement means fuck all, less than, in fact, this is a guy who doesn't believe in germ theory and who only has his position because he's another idiot grifter Trump loyalist.

Sure, some of these peptides are pretty interesting. Who knows, maybe some of them will be legalized. Impossible to tell anything about anything beyond that based on anything that the aforementioned chumps have to say about it.
 
Top