Legal Ayahuasca? Pierce County church offers Peruvian psychedelic ceremony

poledriver

Bluelighter
Joined
Jul 21, 2005
Messages
11,543
Legal Ayahuasca? Pierce County church offers Peruvian psychedelic ceremony

Ayahuasca-Seattle-Washington-2-700x467.jpg


Every year thousands of climbers risk their lives trying to summit Mount Rainier. But if altitude isn’t your thing, now you can confront your fear of death from the apparent safety of a cabin near the mountain — by taking Peruvian hallucinogen ayahuasca.

A 160-acre plot near Elbe, Washington is home to Ayahuasca Healings, a first-of-its-kind organization whose mission is to make ayahuasca, a medicinal and hallucinogenic tea, publicly accessible in the United States. The tea, a plant-based brew that includes Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) is nicknamed “the vine of the dead.”

“We have launched the first public and legal ayahuasca church in America,” said Trinity de Guzman, co-founder of Ayahuasca Healings. “There are other churches that have been doing this for decades, but they have been very underground and the information about them has been very sparse.”

The organization began offering ayahuasca retreats as of January 1st. Less than a month into providing the service, de Guzman said Ayahuasca Healings’ inboxes have been flooded with hundreds of applications for the retreats.
According to a federally issued National Survey on Drug Use and Health report, the number of Americans who reported using DMT in the last year rose from about 140,000 in 2006 to 325,000 in 2012. Since few churches like de Guzman’s exist across the country, ayahuasca and other forms of DMT are often consumed in clandestine circles.

The ayahuasca tea is traditionally brewed by curanderos or shamans in Latin America and has long required people interested in using the medicine to take expensive flights to countries like Peru for access to traditional ceremonies.

De Guzman, whose first ayahuasca retreat in Peru cost him about $5,000, including travel, said he firmly believes that cost shouldn’t be a barrier to accessing the medicine in a safe environment.

For a suggested $1,500 donation to Ayahuasca Healings, visitors can participate in a four-day retreat at the organization’s property near the foot of Mount Rainier. The retreat, led by de Guzman’s business partner Marc Shackman, includes four ayahuasca ceremonies, lodging in a tipi, and food.

Can’t afford to spend a month’s rent on an ayahuasca trip? Ayahuasca Healings offers a scholarship program to cover some of the costs of the retreat for participants with financial limitations.



Legal hurdles

So how do they get away with essentially selling a Schedule I drug to the public?

To host the retreats without fear of the DEA showing up, de Guzman and Shackman had their retreat center become a non-denominational branch of the Oklevueha Native American Church (ONAC). According to the ONAC’s website, the organization, founded in 2007, merges the spiritual traditions of the Lakota Sioux Nation and Okelvueha Seminole, members of which use peyote, a cactus plant with psychedelic properties, as a sacrament in their traditional ceremonies.

The ONAC is federally protected under legal precedents like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the American Indian Religious Freedom Act, which was passed to preserve the traditional religious rights and cultural practices of Native Americans.

According to de Guzman, the laws protecting the Native American Church and its traditional ceremonies would also extend to Ayahuasca Healings and prevent intervention by law enforcement.

Others are skeptical about de Guzman’s claims that the retreats are legally protected, and say Ayahuasca Healings’ clients are putting themselves at risk of prosecution.

Although de Guzman isn’t of Peruvian or Native American descent, he believes ayahuasca is integral to the person he is now. After his first retreat, de Guzman studied traditional ayahuasca ceremonies in Peru for two years and says he has since dedicated his life to making ayahuasca and its benefits accessible to the masses.

But taking ayahuasca is still not necessarily for the casual Seattle stoner, said de Guzman.

“When I went to Peru for my first ceremony, it was one of the most powerful and transformational stages in my entire life,” said de Guzman. “The ayahuasca experience isn’t something that’s easy. I say again and again that this is only for people who are really serious about their inner work, about their healing, the transformation of their lives.”

So what’s taking ayahuasca really like?

Sixty-eight-year-old Seattle resident Susan was invited to attended her first ayahuasca retreat this past December.

She went with one of the more clandestine groups offering ayahuasca ceremonies in the Seattle area (not Ayahuasca Healings). She asked that her last name not be included in this article out of concerns it would impact her professionally.

Susan said a mix of people of different ages and backgrounds attended the retreat — though she said was the oldest person there.

“I had the experience of confronting my own mind, and that was terrifying.”

She said the hallucinogenic visions from the tea were both terrifying and cleansing.

According to popular drug lore, drinking the hallucinogenic tea allowed some ayahuasca drinkers to confront their fear of death. And ayahuasca has some support from clinicians, too:

“Dr. Josep Fábregas, a psychiatrist and addiction expert based in Spain, believes ayahuasca can heal a number of mental disturbances, from addiction to sexual trauma,” the The Daily Beast reported.

Vancouver family practitioner Dr. Gabor Maté used it to treat hundreds of his patients, mostly for addictions to other drugs, until the Canadian government intervened.

“At my age, I’m not afraid of death,” Susan said. “I had the experience of confronting my own mind, and that was terrifying.”

Reaping the spiritual benefits of ayahuasca is a process, said de Guzman.

At the beginning of the Ayahuasca Healings retreat, visitors go through a purge, which often includes vomiting. To regular Ayahuasca drinkers, the purge means letting go of negativity, resentment, and other emotional baggage, said de Guzman.

Ayahuasca-Seattle-Washington-3-700x467.jpg


“Other than childbirth, I never felt like I was not in control or in charge of my own system. I was on this ride and there was no turning back,” said Susan. “There were amazing, beautiful insights and learnings. A lot of it, for me, was to get out of my head and try not to [overthink] everything.”

Ultimately, de Guzman believes that his church is something American city-dwellers like Susan can benefit from on a spiritual level.

“We grow up in a society that teaches us a lot of negative ways of thinking,” he said. “The society we live in is very fear-based. We’re bombarded with media that’s often about the fear and what could go wrong.”

The Ayahuasca Healings website takes questions of cultural appropriation in using the drug head on, saying the issue of race shouldn’t be used “as an excuse to block and limit the sacred, sincere use of Plant Medicines in a religious context.”

“The people in South America and in Peru, they work with the medicine in a very traditional way. They don’t understand that we as North Americans have different stresses, different challenges that you know, people who live in the jungle don’t have,” de Guzman said.

To ensure Americans have access to ayahuasca, de Guzman and Stackman plan to expand outside of Washington. Their goal, said de Guzman, is to open two churches a year with a total of 30 churches across the nation by 2032.

So would an ayahuasca newbie like Susan even want to try taking it again?

“It’s not a trivial experience, at least it wasn’t for me. … I’m very glad I did it,” she said. “Six weeks ago, I never wanted to take it again. And now… I’m not saying that.”

This post has been updated to reflect questions about the legality of the retreats offered by Ayahuasca Healings. More in the comments below.

http://www.seattleglobalist.com/201...ngton-peruvian-psychedelic-drug-retreat/46695
 
I support both traditional shamanic ceremonies and Ayahuasca. Ayahuasca is an effective medicine, should get thoroughly studied, and should be legal. The caveat is, giving this medicine should involve medical doctors when given in this context. If the DEA put DMT in schedule II or III this could significantly increase both Ayahuasca research and the safety of Ayahuasca use.
 
This is still completely illegal and the advertising used for this specific group is misleading. Beware and engage with this so called church at your own risk. See some of the comments under the Vice article or info in the links for a better understanding about this recent issue and those raised by others more well informed about the legal ramifications surrounding such activities. Just like the UDV and Santo Daime who fought for their right in court to use these plant medicines this group is required to do the same to be considered technically legal. It should disgust people that they are asking for "donations" of $1,497-1,997 for one-four sessions.
https://medium.com/@jhamiltonhudson/...080#.ychog7ryc

https://www.erowid.org/chemicals/aya...asca_law.shtml
 
Last edited:
Drinking Ayahuasca in a setting that has been popularized and advertised through Facebook and youtube consistently for months online is far from safe or a good idea. Literally a group that helps to package and turn this medicine into a franchise like system is not the way forward. From what I can see there is actually no specific legal documentation on their website that even hints at truly being protected from prosecution if you attend their retreats. Imagine tripping your brains out and then being subjected to a raid from a swat team. The UDV won a court case protecting it's sacramental use of Ayahuasca. This does not apply to spiritual retreats and healing workshops that combine the use of plants containing DMT for a rather large donation of $1,997.
 
This is still completely illegal and the advertising used for this specific group is misleading. Beware and engage with this so called church at your own risk. See some of the comments under the Vice article or info in the links for a better understanding about this recent issue and those raised by others more well informed about the legal ramifications surrounding such activities. Just like the UDV and Santo Daime who fought for their right in court to use these plant medicines this group is required to do the same to be considered technically legal. It should disgust people that they are asking for "donations" of $1,497-1,997 for one-four sessions.
https://medium.com/@jhamiltonhudson/...080#.ychog7ryc

https://www.erowid.org/chemicals/aya...asca_law.shtml

Well said. The first actual church in the United States that has legal Ayahuasca/Yage is in New Mexico.

There's also 'legal' Peyote in AZ and NM but it's affiliated with a church, and apparently you are only allowed to take it alone.

Everyone I know that was or is actually serious about drinking Ayahuasca goes to Peru or Brasil and takes it in legal ceremonies there with native people who have been doing it for centuries and know what to do if something goes wrong for someone. These people do not like Ayahuasca tourism, the McKennas who they say abused Ayahuasca and ignored the native religious use of plants/fungi for centuries, and they have told me how Ayahuasca is not a drug that most people should take or think that it's just another trip like on mushrooms or LSD.
 
Psilocybin is pretty close to DMT as far as what they look like molecularly...in fact psilocin is otherwise known as 4-OH-DMT, right?

I've never taken ayahuasca though so I can't comment with any sort of authority on that.
 
Everyone I know that was or is actually serious about drinking Ayahuasca goes to Peru or Brasil and takes it in legal ceremonies there with native people who have been doing it for centuries and know what to do if something goes wrong for someone.

I can almost guarantee you they haven't been doing it for centuries. They all claim to be authentic yet very few are. It's an industry that sprung up to meet demand. I think it's better idea to look into making your own and if something goes wrong you have access to a real first world hospital not some fake ass medicine man.
I wouldn't pay 1500 bucks to do it in Washington either, even though it's my favorite state. That seems like gouging.
 
Top