Leading world politicians urge 'paradigm shift' on drugs policy

edgarshade

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
1,954
Location
UK
Guardian

Jamie Doward
The Observer, Sunday 29 May 2011

With reader comments

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/29/drugs-trade-drugs

Former presidents, prime ministers, eminent economists and leading members of the business community will unite behind a call for a shift in global drug policy. The Global Commission on Drug Policy will host a press conference at the Waldorf Astoria hotel in New York to launch a report that describes the drug war as a failure and calls for a "paradigm shift" in approaching the issue.

Those backing the call include Ernesto Zedillo, former president of Mexico; George Papandreou, former prime minister of Greece; César Gaviria, former president of Colombia; Kofi Annan, former UN secretary general; Fernando Henrique Cardoso, former president of Brazil; George Shultz, former US secretary of state; Javier Solana, former EU high representative; Virgin tycoon Richard Branson; and Paul Volcker, former chairman of the US Federal Reserve.

The commission will call for drug policy to move from being focused on criminal justice towards a public health approach. The global advocacy organisation Avaaz, which has nine million members, will present a petition in support of the commission's recommendations to UN secretary general Ban Ki-moon.

The commission is the most distinguished group to call for such far-reaching changes in the way society deals with illicit drugs. Danny Kushlick, head of external affairs at Transform, the drug policy foundation that has consultative status with the UN, said current events, such as the cartel-related violence in Mexico, President Barack Obama's comments that it was "perfectly legitimate" to question whether the war on drugs was working, and the wider global economic crisis, had given calls for a comprehensive overhaul of the world's drugs policy a fresh impetus.

Kushlick described this week's conference as hugely significant. "What we have here is the greatest collection thus far of ex-presidents and prime ministers calling very clearly for decriminalisation and experiments with legal regulation," he said. "It will be a watershed moment."

Transform believes the case for overhauling the prohibition approach to drugs is now overwhelming. It quotes Nicholas Green, chairman of the Bar Council, who observed that drug-related crime costs the UK economy around £13bn a year. "Decriminalising personal use can have positive consequences; it can free up huge amounts of police resources, reduce crime and recidivism and improve public health," he said.

But while politicians no longer in office are vocal in calling for a change, incumbents appear less likely to back the idea of any radical shift in policy. In its 2002 review of UK drug policy, the parliamentary home affairs select committee, which included the prime minister, David Cameron, called for the government to "initiate a discussion" into the possibility of legalising and regulating drugs.

Despite the calls successive ministers have declined to endorse them.
 
they shouldve done this while they still had theyre job lol. Atleast this will hopefully bring some light on the matter to the average dude on the street.
 
they shouldve done this while they still had theyre job lol. Atleast this will hopefully bring some light on the matter to the average dude on the street.

The average dude in the street doesn't read the Guardian. They read the Sun and the Daily Mail, Daily Mirror and Daily Telegraph in that order.

News like this doesn't get printed there very often, if at all. It might get onto the TV news if we are lucky.
 
oh shit Richard Branson is a part of this... with all the money backing him hopefully he can pull some strings with his powerful and rich friends!
 
Someone needs to grow the balls to stand up and say this 'before' they retire. Everyone knows the war on drugs is bullshit, but nothing will change until someone is willing to be the first to step forward.
 
^^^ Couldn't agree more Crankinit, as Jean-Claude Junker, the former Prime Minister of Luxembourg once said, "We know what to do, we just don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it."
 
Last edited:
White House Rebuttal:

Setting the Record Straight: The Global Commission Report on Drug Legalization

Office of the Director, ONDCP
June 2, 2011

Rafael Lemaitre, ONDCP Communications Director, issued the following statement yesterday in response to a report by the Global Commission on Drug Policy calling for the legalization of all drugs.

"The Obama Administration's efforts to reduce drug use are not born out of a culture war or drug war mentality, but out of the recognition that drug use strains our economy, health, and public safety. The bottom line is that balanced drug control efforts are making a big difference. Today, drug use in America is half of what it was thirty years ago, cocaine production in Colombia has dropped by almost two-thirds, and we're successfully diverting thousands of non-violent offenders into treatment instead of jail by supporting alternatives to incarceration. Drug addiction is a disease that can be successfully prevented and treated. Making drugs more available – as this report suggests – will make it harder to keep our communities healthy and safe."

Here are some key facts about drug use and abuse today:

• Overall drug use in the United States has dropped substantially over the past thirty years. The number of Americans using illicit drugs today is roughly half the rate it was in the late 70's. (National Survey on Drug Use and Health, HHS)

• More recently, there has been a 46 percent drop in current cocaine use among young adults (age 18 to 25 years) over the past five years, and a 68 percent drop in the rate of people testing positive for cocaine in the workplace since 2006. Additionally, the potential production capacity for pure cocaine in Colombia has declined from an estimated 700 metric tons potential cocaine production in 2001 to only 270 metric tons in 2009 – a 61 percent drop.

• According to the latest UN World Drug Report (2010) "Demand for cocaine in the U.S. has been in long-term decline.”

• The President's inaugural Drug Control Strategy - released one year ago - is a marked departure from previous approaches to drug policy. The Strategy focuses on both the public health and public safety aspects of drug abuse and addiction. It focuses on addiction as a disease and on the importance of preventing drug use, as well as providing treatment to those who need it, including those who are involved in the criminal justice system. For the first time, it emphasizes support for millions of individuals who are in recovery from drug addiction. The President's Budget, dedicates over $10 billion in Federal funds for reducing drug consumption in the United States.

• Legalization remains a non-starter in the Obama Administration because research shows that illegal drug use is associated with voluntary treatment admissions, fatal drugged driving accidents, mental illness, and emergency room admissions.

• An independent 2010 study from RAND concluded that "legalizing marijuana in California will not dramatically reduce the drug revenues collected by Mexican drug trafficking organizations from sales to the United States." We also know that these groups produce and traffic methamphetamine and heroin, continue to move significant amounts of cocaine, and conduct an array of criminal activities including kidnapping, extortion, and human trafficking. Because of the variety and scope of the cartels' business, and its illicit and purposefully obscured nature, determining the precise percentage of revenues from marijuana is problematic, but we can be very confident that even the complete elimination of one of their illicit "product lines" will not result in their disbanding their criminal organizations.

• The United States has been clear that we cannot arrest our way out of the drug problem. In August 2010, the President signed the fair sentencing act which reduces the disparity in the amounts of powder cocaine and crack cocaine required for the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences and eliminates the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of crack cocaine.

To learn more about how drug use affects Americans and our communities, visit:
• National Institute on Drug Abuse's Web page on the science of addiction
• Director Kerlikowske's post on the Obama Administration's Public Health Approach to Drug Policy
• ONDCP's fact sheet on the consequences of illicit drug use

http://ofsubstance.gov/blogs/pushing_back/archive/2011/06/02/51896.aspx
 
Most of the statistics that were listed in their response were totally made up.

There are still hundreds of metric tons of cocaine being produced...this proves what exactly? That they still failed to do anything about drug production or consumption? Exactly, nothing.
 
That response was what I expected-typical elected official bullshit. I have a hard time believing those statistics too.

Lol at "the US has been clear we cannot arrest our way out of a drug problem." Really? Because it damn sure looks like we're trying to.

What's that saying about insanity being something you do over and over again but expecting a different outcome? I think that would be a fair way to classify our drug policies.
 
• More recently, there has been a 46 percent drop in current cocaine use among young adults (age 18 to 25 years) over the past five years, and a 68 percent drop in the rate of people testing positive for cocaine in the workplace since 2006. Additionally, the potential production capacity for pure cocaine in Colombia has declined from an estimated 700 metric tons potential cocaine production in 2001 to only 270 metric tons in 2009 – a 61 percent drop.

• According to the latest UN World Drug Report (2010) "Demand for cocaine in the U.S. has been in long-term decline.”
Moron officials, that's because of legal highs/bath salts rather than success of WoD.

• Legalization remains a non-starter in the Obama Administration because research shows that illegal drug use is associated with voluntary treatment admissions, fatal drugged driving accidents, mental illness, and emergency room admissions.
I spy with my little eye: double standards. Last time I checked these issues are also present with ethanol as well, but nobody would dare to speak out about criminalizing it.
 
My rebuttal to the White House's talking points:

• Overall drug use in the United States has dropped substantially over the past thirty years. The number of Americans using illicit drugs today is roughly half the rate it was in the late 70's. (National Survey on Drug Use and Health, HHS)

Does that take into account prescription drugs? In the late 70s there wasn't widespread Adderall, Ritalin, Vicodin, oxycodone, Xanax and many other prescription delicacies. There were barbs and Quaaludes (someone who was alive back then please spot me here), but I'm confident their use wasn't nearly as widespread. I can see people on Adderall diminishing their meth & cocaine use. Similarly, I can see oxycodone users shying away from heroin.

Also, I suspect you're no longer counting much of the marijuana use in California and other states that have medicalized it. Please link to your sources.

• More recently, there has been a 46 percent drop in current cocaine use among young adults (age 18 to 25 years) over the past five years, and a 68 percent drop in the rate of people testing positive for cocaine in the workplace since 2006. Additionally, the potential production capacity for pure cocaine in Colombia has declined from an estimated 700 metric tons potential cocaine production in 2001 to only 270 metric tons in 2009 – a 61 percent drop.

• According to the latest UN World Drug Report (2010) "Demand for cocaine in the U.S. has been in long-term decline.”


Hooray for levamisole! How did it get in there in the first place?

• The President's inaugural Drug Control Strategy - released one year ago - is a marked departure from previous approaches to drug policy. The Strategy focuses on both the public health and public safety aspects of drug abuse and addiction. It focuses on addiction as a disease and on the importance of preventing drug use, as well as providing treatment to those who need it, including those who are involved in the criminal justice system. For the first time, it emphasizes support for millions of individuals who are in recovery from drug addiction. The President's Budget, dedicates over $10 billion in Federal funds for reducing drug consumption in the United States.

That's great and shit but it shouldn't be a surrogate for legalization.

• Legalization remains a non-starter in the Obama Administration because research shows that illegal drug use is associated with voluntary treatment admissions, fatal drugged driving accidents, mental illness, and emergency room admissions.

That's why legalization remains a non-starter? It seems to me legalization remains a non-starter because you're making so much money off of it. Your Secretary of State even said as much in February (Clinton: "We can't legalize drugs. There's just too much money in it."

• An independent 2010 study from RAND concluded that "legalizing marijuana in California will not dramatically reduce the drug revenues collected by Mexican drug trafficking organizations from sales to the United States." We also know that these groups produce and traffic methamphetamine and heroin, continue to move significant amounts of cocaine, and conduct an array of criminal activities including kidnapping, extortion, and human trafficking. Because of the variety and scope of the cartels' business, and its illicit and purposefully obscured nature, determining the precise percentage of revenues from marijuana is problematic, but we can be very confident that even the complete elimination of one of their illicit "product lines" will not result in their disbanding their criminal organizations.

This is why you need to legalize the lot! But the existence of other black-market products should have no bearing on whether or not you legalize weed. Also, by weight, most of what the cartels are smuggling is marijuana, and there is a direct correlation between mass of contraband and size of cartel workforce.

• The United States has been clear that we cannot arrest our way out of the drug problem. In August 2010, the President signed the fair sentencing act which reduces the disparity in the amounts of powder cocaine and crack cocaine required for the imposition of mandatory minimum sentences and eliminates the mandatory minimum sentence for simple possession of crack cocaine.

Stop arresting people for drug use today! Today! Do it today! Not 50 years from now but today! In the 30s the US realized they couldn't arrest their way out of the alcohol problem and guess what they did? They legalized it! With alacrity.
 
Hooray for levamisole! How did it get in there in the first place?

Just to point out an interesting correlation:

--in the 20s the US did not want industrial ethanol to be diverted for consumption, so they doped it with methanol, a poison.

--more recently, the FDA did not want hydrocodone and other prescription opioids to be abused so they doped them with paracetamol, a poison.

--and oh yeah, many of the emergency room visits you cited as reason for continued prohibition result from the paracetamol you put into the opioids.

--not saying nothing, just saying...
 
• More recently, there has been a 46 percent drop in current cocaine use among young adults (age 18 to 25 years) over the past five years, and a 68 percent drop in the rate of people testing positive for cocaine in the workplace since 2006. Additionally, the potential production capacity for pure cocaine in Colombia has declined from an estimated 700 metric tons potential cocaine production in 2001 to only 270 metric tons in 2009 – a 61 percent drop.

Like these motherfuckers don't know the reason cocaine production is down is because the Colombians are now pumpin out the whole fuckin East Coast heroin supply they don't got as much time/people to be fuckin around with nut ass coke.

It's like they gave all those numbers on coke, but nothin about heroin usage or poduction because that shit skyrocketed over the last decade

Not to mention like 235 said about pills, between pills, dope, and meth coke is just fuckin not what it used to be.
 
Richard Branson Calling To End War On Drugs! + Biggest Petition Yet!

Mods - Sorry if this isnt in the right section of the forums . i felt it would suit best in here while also getting the most publicity as its a pretty popular part of the site..

SOURCE - http://www.virgin.com/richard-branson/blog/end-the-war-on-drugs
+ Sign one of the biggest petitions yet too help end the war on drugs by clicking HERE

"New York today - joined with former Presidents from Latin America calling for an end to the war on drugs. In the last 50 years we have seen increased drug usage, filled our jails, cost millions of tax payer dollars and fuelled organised crime. It is definitely time for an alternative approach. The criminal drugs trade has a turnover of over US $300billion each year and it's a trade that kills millions through murder, disease and corruption.Time to end the criminalisation and stigmatising of drug users. People with drug problems need health care, not prison! The facts speak for themselves - where countries treat drug-use as a public health issue not a crime, disease, ill-health and costs have fallen.Join me and over 500,000 people, young and old from across the globe who have said enough is enough. We can no longer pretend that the war on drugs is working. Make your voice heard: http://avaaz.org/en/end_the_war_on_drugs/?fp"

Sir Richard Branson is a bosssss
 
Obama made his promises to revise drug policy just to buy votes. In politics there's little relevance between what you promise to do at first and what you end up doing later.

As for that official report from his administration:

Oh Kent, you can use statistics to prove anything - 14% of all people know that. - Homer Simpson
 
Obama made his promises to revise drug policy just to buy votes. In politics there's little relevance between what you promise to do at first and what you end up doing later.

As for that official report from his administration:

Oh Kent, you can use statistics to prove anything - 14% of all people know that. - Homer Simpson

look what obama says here .
He was the best candidate for presidency (due too america only allowing one too vote for two parties. WTF) and yeah and id vote for him over Mccain.

But man this dude is all about his words.
All these speeches u heard from him about so called "change" and shit are written by highly paid speech writers . I know alot of people say its obvious but most dont think so.

FUCCCK The world is soo fuckin corrupt .
Im out for a joint .
Mary jane be the only thing that make the pain stop .
 
Obama made his promises to revise drug policy just to buy votes. In politics there's little relevance between what you promise to do at first and what you end up doing later

I believe if my memory serves me right (which it sometimes does not), Obama only said that the policy is worth taking a look at.
 
Top