JWH-018 and AM-2201 share the same basic "geometry" -- only with fluorene substituted on the "tail" of AM-2201. So the chemistry is not identical -- and the effects are definitely not identical. Both affect the same basic receptors -- but in different ways (head-high vs body-stone)
So would AM-2201 be considered an "analog" of JWH-018 ? (if it was intended for human consumption)
So would AM-2201 be considered an "analog" of JWH-018 ? (if it was intended for human consumption)