Jeff Sessions ordered fed prosecutors to seek max punishment for drug offences

avcpl

Bluelighter
Joined
Feb 4, 2009
Messages
1,147
Location
So Cal; LA county
Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered federal prosecutors this week to seek the maximum punishment for drug offenses, in one of the clearest breaks yet from the policies of the Justice Department under the Obama administration.

The move is an abrupt departure from policy made by President Barack Obama's Attorney General, to reduce the number of people convicted of certain lower-level drug crimes being given long jail terms.

The change, "affirms our responsibility to enforce the law, is moral and just, and produces consistency," Sessions said, in a memo to federal prosecutors written May 10 and made public Friday.

The memo urged prosecutors to file "the most serious, readily provable" charges that carry the most substantial punishment, including mandatory minimum sentences.

It marked a reversal of the policy imposed in 2013 under former Attorney General Eric Holder's "smart on crime" initiative. This directed prosecutors not to report the amount of drugs involved in an arrest if it would trigger mandatory minimums for non-violent offenders who had no ties to drug cartels or gangs and who did not sell to children.

In announcing his policy, Holder said at the time, "With an outsized, unnecessarily large prison population, we need to ensure that incarceration is used to punish, deter, and rehabilitate — not merely to warehouse and forget." Prosecutors were directed instead to focus on the most serious offenses.

Holder's approach included legislation to reduce some mandatory minimum sentences. Although it received bi-partisan support in Congress, it did not pass. One of those against the idea was Jeff Sessions, who did however support the successful move to reduce the disparity between sentences for offenses involving crack, as opposed to powdered cocaine.

Some prosecutors opposed Holder's directive, saying it deprived them of a tool for persuading drug crime defendants to plead guilty. But two years after imposing his policy, Holder said the share of cases in which defendants cooperated remained the same — about 97 percent.

In this week's memo, Sessions said the change was consistent with the Justice Department's responsibility "to fulfill our role in a way that accords with the law, advances public safety, and promotes respect for our legal system."

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...rders-tougher-drug-crime-prosecutions-n758111
 
If everyone that lives and votes in amerika, that uses this web site, is not writing to their representatives I do not know why not. Speak up about this insane man and his insane drive to take us back into what NEVER worked.
 
18485778_162290067637319_3233650322378413506_n.jpg
 
I'm not sure why any of you are at all surprised or offended or shocked over this. Both major political parties are all right with the war on drugs. Hillary would have spent billions of dollars to retrain the police, just to keep putting people like you behind bars. The only difference is how long they want to keep you in jail for. This is why I vote Libertarian, I do believe in legalizing drugs, and I'll keep voting for it until it happens.
 
I'm not sure why any of you are at all surprised or offended or shocked over this. Both major political parties are all right with the war on drugs. Hillary would have spent billions of dollars to retrain the police, just to keep putting people like you behind bars. The only difference is how long they want to keep you in jail for. This is why I vote Libertarian, I do believe in legalizing drugs, and I'll keep voting for it until it happens.
Yep :\
 
I don't believe that opiates should be legalised
And you base this belief on what? You don't believe adults should have the right to put whatever they want into their body they want so long as they harm no one else? You don't believe that prohibition does 10,000 times more harm than good? Do you believe that alcohol and tobacco should remain legal but not opioids or other drugs? And if so on the last one, I would love to hear the logic behind that.
 
They certainly hurt themselves and their family and friends when they die from an overdose. You can't overdose on tobacco and it's harder to fatally OD on alcohol

I'm fine with legal weed, ketamine, and psychedelics.

Tobacco causes so many to witness slow painful suffering(and then death) of family members by way of cancer and alcohol causes so many to suffer from drunk driving injuries/fatalities, and yet by law we are allowed to choose, as adults, if we want to partake....

I know these points have been used and overused but like tre and matt(of south park) said about "offensive" comedy, "its either all okay or none of it is."

Plus, not everyone using opiates/opioids is trying to stay in a hard nod indefinitely just like not everyone using ket is trying to stay at the bottom of a hole indefinitely.
 
Last edited:
They certainly hurt themselves and their family and friends when they die from an overdose. You can't overdose on tobacco and it's harder to fatally OD on alcohol

I'm fine with legal weed, ketamine, and psychedelics.

I don't think talking about legalization is productive because there are SO many misconception about what it would be like. Everyone assumes it would be just like what it was like prior to the prohibition and criminalization of opioid use (pre-1914), but even if we wanted to so much has changed in terms of the FDA, consumer culture, healthcare and regulation since then that it isn't like we'd be able to go back in time even if we wanted to (and no one is arguing that the lack of regulation back then is really desirable or any better than the status quo - well it probably is better than the status quo, but that is besides the point).

What needs to happen, like needs to right now, is an end to criminalization of drug use. So many great things happen when drug use is decriminalized. There is much more money available for funding medical treatment for addiction, lower rates of violent and property crime, more money to fund education, a much more productive economic base (there is some really interesting research comparing the economic costs of the war on drugs compared to decriminalization). Decriminalization isn't necessarily legalization though.

Keep drug use criminalized however makes treating drug use as anything but a public safety issue impossible. Anyone who is serious about addressing the potential harms of drug use like addiction and doesn't support a public health approach to substance use, which requires a paradigm shits in drug policy away from a lopsided focus on public safety, is living in a fantasy land. Until there is a public health approach to substance use in this country, issues related to addiction are just going to get worse.

Certainly, I expect issues related to addiction and drug relate harm more generally to get significantly worse under this administration. It's what happens when you criminalize this kind of behavior, as it makes accessing treatment infinitely more difficult, and the treatments much less likely to succeed.

I personally have higher hopes of the UK to decriminalizing drug use before we do in the states. We are the home of the FBI, Herbert Hoover and the war on drugs, after all.
 
And you base this belief on what? You don't believe adults should have the right to put whatever they want into their body they want so long as they harm no one else? You don't believe that prohibition does 10,000 times more harm than good? Do you believe that alcohol and tobacco should remain legal but not opioids or other drugs? And if so on the last one, I would love to hear the logic behind that.
It's like I utterly cannot understand the rationale behind that above user's statement. Incredible!
 
And you base this belief on what? You don't believe adults should have the right to put whatever they want into their body they want so long as they harm no one else? You don't believe that prohibition does 10,000 times more harm than good? Do you believe that alcohol and tobacco should remain legal but not opioids or other drugs? And if so on the last one, I would love to hear the logic behind that.

don't beleive opiates should be legal either, just for pain. the dea should def get off doctors asses and allow more prescribing because those that need it are fucked because of heroin users.

You can definitely overdose and die on tobacco.(nicotine)
Please do a little research before posting misinformation as this is a harm reduction site.

he doesn't understand research, thats why he voted for sessions and trump!
 
What needs to happen, like needs to right now, is an end to criminalization of drug use. So many great things happen when drug use is decriminalized. There is much more money available for funding medical treatment for addiction, lower rates of violent and property crime, more money to fund education, a much more productive economic base (there is some really interesting research comparing the economic costs of the war on drugs compared to decriminalization). Decriminalization isn't necessarily legalization though.

Keep drug use criminalized however makes treating drug use as anything but a public safety issue impossible. Anyone who is serious about addressing the potential harms of drug use like addiction and doesn't support a public health approach to substance use, which requires a paradigm shits in drug policy away from a lopsided focus on public safety, is living in a fantasy land. Until there is a public health approach to substance use in this country, issues related to addiction are just going to get worse.

I couldn't agree more. The US government needs to stop with their puritanical views on the matter and take the cue from Portugal in terms of how much of an improvement it's made.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/m.mic....riminalized-all-drugs-here-s-what-s-happening
 
You can definitely overdose and die on tobacco.(nicotine)
Please do a little research before posting misinformation as this is a harm reduction site.

+1

If overdose is your concern, legalisation of opiates should be a priority.
Countries that prescribe pharma-grade heroin to addicts have a far lower rate of fatal ODs than countries where supply is unregulated (especially those flooded with fent and its analogues)
 
Top