Jamaican Study Of Pregnant Mothers Shows That Marijuana Doesn’t Harm Newborns

slimvictor

Bluelight Crew
Joined
Dec 29, 2008
Messages
6,477
Location
"Darkness cannot be dissipated with more darkness.
It’s almost too taboo to discuss: pregnant women smoking marijuana. It’s a dirty little secret for women, particularly during the harrowing first trimester, who turn to cannabis for relief from nausea and stress.

If you were to inquire about pot and pregnancy on the Web, Baby Center offers a strongly worded warning from Gerald Briggs, pharmacist clinical specialist.

Briggs says that pot affects the baby’s growth and development and–gasp!–may even cause childhood leukemia. But there are no facts or studies attributed to back up the claims.

More than 50 pages of comments were posted to the site about Briggs’ statements. Some proclaimed the virtues of smoking marijuana while pregnant, offering proof of healthy children and stories of functioning during pregnancy thanks to cannabis. Other comments viciously showed disdain for pregnant patients, resorting to name-calling.

Pregnant women in Jamaica use marijuana regularly to relieve nausea, as well as to relieve stress and depression, often in the form of a tea or tonic. In the late 1960s, grad student Melanie Dreher was chosen by her professors to perform an ethnographic study on marijuana use in Jamaica to observe and document its usage and its consequences among pregnant women.

Dreher studied 24 Jamaican infants exposed to marijuana prenatally and 20 infants that were not exposed. Her work evolved into the book Women and Cannabis: Medicine, Science and Sociology, part of which included her field studies.

Most North American studies have shown marijuana use can cause birth defects and developmental problems.

Those studies did not isolate marijuana use, however, lumping cannabis with more destructive substances ranging from alcohol and tobacco to meth and heroin.

In Jamaica, Dreher found a culture that policed its own ganja intake and considers its use spiritual. For the herb’s impact when used during pregnancy, she handed over reports utilizing the Brazelton Scale, the highly recognized neonatal behavioral assessment that evaluates behavior.

The profile identifies the baby’s strengths, adaptive responses and possible vulnerabilities. The researchers continued to evaluate the children from the study up to 5 years old. The results showed no negative impact on the children, on the contrary they seemed to excel.

Plenty of people did not like that answer, particularly her funders, the National Institute on Drug Abuse. They did not continue to flip the bill for the study and did not readily release its results.

“March of Dimes was supportive,” Dreher says. “But it was clear that NIDA was not interested in continuing to fund a study that didn’t produce negative results. I was told not to resubmit. We missed an opportunity to follow the study through adolescence and through adulthood.”

Now dean of nursing at Rush University with degrees in nursing, anthropology and philosophy, plus a Ph.D. in anthropology from Columbia University, Dreher did not have experience with marijuana before she shipped off for Jamaica.

cont at
http://www.theweedblog.com/jamaican...rs-shows-that-marijuana-doesnt-harm-newborns/
 
pretty sure that's a fairly old study that is nevertheless overlooked. I remember reading it years ago when my little sister was pregnant. In any case, i guess it's a good reminder of NIDA's influence on drug policy and propaganda and funding bullshit studies to scaremonger people for whatever reason.
 
But there are no facts or studies attributed to back up the claims.

There exists hundreds of drugs and medications that come with warnings not to be used during pregnancy that have had no proper studies to substantiate. The reason is it is ethically and morally irresponsible to perform double blind experiments on unborn children. No mother in their right mind would agree to take a drug when the effects are unknown. Sometimes common sense and gut feelings should over rule a single isolated statistical study with such a small sample size and vague recorded parameters.

Smoking of any kind causes vasoconstriction of capillaries, particularly in the extremities. It makes sense that the flow of blood to the foetus would be compromised. Now thc may not cross the placenta but once again no one is willing to perform such and experiment and be able to get it published. My feeling is if cannabis affects developing brains then surely it affects the brains of foetuses. Mothers such be wary of a myriad of foods from livers, sausage to seafood for low risk complications so why not simply avoid cannabis for 9 months to give your child the best possible start in life?
 
Smoking of any kind causes vasoconstriction of capillaries, particularly in the extremities. It makes sense that the flow of blood to the foetus would be compromised.

Also, igniting the plant material creates toxic compounds. Certainly not smart to smoke anything during pregnancy (or, really, ever).
But this is different than the issue of taking the drug, since it can be eaten or vaporized.

More importantly, I agree with you that it makes sense to avoid all potential harmful substances during pregnancy - especially given what we know about the effects of cannabis on developing brains.

Edit: Thought I would search for evidence that cannabis negatively affects the developing brain, but I had trouble finding any. I had believed that this was a closed-and-shut case, but my failure to find any studies at all definitively linking early cannabis use with brain development makes me wonder. Can someone out there please - please - cite some sources that show how early cannabis use affects brain development in any negative way? Or, are there none?

The only study I could find was the first one listed here:
http://scholar.google.co.jp/scholar...on+developing+brain&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5&as_vis=1
But it is very inconclusive.

Help?
 
Last edited:
I already believed this before I read this article, but a good read nonetheless.

I don't see the point in funding experiments and then cutting the funding when the outcome of the experiment isn't what you were hoping for. 8(
 
So you condone experimenting on the unborn and children? If you look more closely at this study you will see it sampled only 24 kids up until the age of five using the Brazelton Scale, that is testing "the baby’s strengths, adaptive responses and possible vulnerabilities". To put it simply it tested how quickly they crawled, walked and talked. From personal experience I could see thc or other active ingredients of cannabis stimulating certain motor regions of any ones brain, but I would be concerned about their future intelligence not to mention risk of depression or schizophrenia. Until they come back with a study tracking these kids up until the age of 18 I'm never going to be happy with pregnant women smoking weed.
 
Top