Many groups have been mistreated throughout history. Many groups have had pain. On the list of persecuted minorities throughout history, I doubt Muslims would even crack the top ten. So why is it that they've been responsible for nearly all of the most deadly terror attacks? Wouldn't you think the natives here in the US would've done a few bombings by now? We genocided 90% of their population and have relegated them to lives of alcoholism and poverty on reservations to this day. What about black people who were literally enslaved and treated as dogs for centuries? I mean I could go on and on.
So while I sympathize with any group who has to endure persecution, "the pain of Muslims" is not unique and does not give them a right to use their religion as fuel to inflict pain on others.
Native Americans do not lead Holy Wars. They have no reformed religion. They are, as you say alcoholics that live in poverty. They have not even close to the money that's behind the Islamic terror attacks.
They are not promised 72 hot unspoiled chicks in paradise if they kill some infidels. On some reservations Americans aren't even allowed at all, so you can't say there's no anger or pain towards America. They pay you back in different ways, by making you addicted to gambling for example. Just as China pays back its pain in a different way, by funneling fentanyl and now benzodope into the US. And China does have a LOT of money and a LOT of anger towards the West.
Not every attack is that obvious.
Uh, because we do the calculating mostly? If America's attacks on hospitals, power plants, schools in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan alone were seen as terror attacks by the West, the US would lead this fucking show. Islamic extremists would count their attacks as a Holy War, you say it's terror. Just like you count your attacks as "bringing freedom to the world..with bombs", but a lot of the rest of the world sees it as terror. Even among your NATO friends, a lot of us see it as terror
And what is bombing a hospital and killing thousands with one strike, if not an act of terror? And your country keeps getting away with it because good people like you get defensive. How can you STILL all defend this? I know Americans, and I know most of the people don't want these wars. So how can your mafioso government still be even ALIVE to this day. French Revolution those bitches already you fucking pussies. There is no escape from your two party dictatorship, get it into your heads. It's a fucking farce. Gustave Le Bon lesson 1: Split your people into two camps to control them.
Do you know how many fucking civilians they murdered in just these 20 years since 9/11? Over 600,000 confirmed civilian deaths. Were those terrorists too? A lot of countries do count these American "wars" as terrorist attacks.
To Muslims, yes the US is a huge fucking terrorist. And was, long before 9/11.
And the only people that could stop this madness are so brainwashed they just keep shouting "U S A! FOUR MORE YEARS!", praying to their flag like a cult, instead of once taking a look at what this absolutely ruthless country is doing. Because it's "un-american" to think critically of the US, and "un-patriotic" to critique your president. Oh how fucking convenient is that?
Personally it doesn't make me wonder that their faith keeps radicalising, when we keep leading wars against them.
How is this ever going to lead somewhere, where they just say "O we love these motherfuckers that keep trying convert us and take our resources and treasures since year 1095, let's become more like them"
It's not like our faith didn't use to be radical. If you wanted a woman who is your prisoner, the Bible said, if she didn't want you back, you could kill her family, shave all her hairs off, lock her inside a dark room for 3 weeks, and after that take her out and marry her.
That's our Holy Bible.
But they never had a chance to become more down to earth. Maybe if we didn't try murdering them all for a millenium...? I wonder
War never leads anywhere. Just name any war that improved things
