Hmm I really wish this dude was here to respond to the criticism. "If" I take his article at face value, this is how it seems to me:
I wanted to find a woman who could be my equal, my partner. I believed in finding that one true love and being committed to each other forever.
So he didn't start off approaching women and social situations as a bitter misogynist. It sounds like he started off with the same preconceptions as most people.
They are all normal, healthy, well-adjusted, good-looking (8+ on the looks scale) professional women.
Ok, if true, this would counter the criticism that he only goes after one type of woman. Actually one bias I can think of that he's introduced is that they're all professional, i.e. at least somewhat ambitious. IMHO ambitious people are more of the "want to have it all" mentality and are more prone to cheat if given the right opportunity.
I can pick her up in front of all her friends (with 80% efficiency for each approach.)
Again, if true, this is insanely hard to do. So this would build up an awful lot of credibility for this guy in my mind.
Women will slip me their phone number when their boyfriend is in the bathroom. I can talk to women on the street or in the grocery store and within 30 minutes, I can usually have sex with them right there in my car or get them back to my place.
This kind of thing is probably what eroded his faith in women/humanity and the prospect of a real relationship. All he had to do was push the right buttons to get crazy impromptu sex with "taken" women.
The sweetest most innocent girls you ever laid eyes on, will cheat at the drop of a HAT. The one thing that most men value most - loyalty - is just not there with women.
This is just more support for the claim that he's been successful with many types of women. They many types part is important, or else it's just as everyone has said: same girl 200 times.
Nothing is more meaningful, or compelling, to a woman than (1) the way she feels and (2) learning more about her own inner self and having emotional realizations.
This is the part I find most interesting I'm always honing or changing or fine-tuning beliefs, but if you put a gun to my head right now (I'm 28) I believe this pretty firmly. Not even considering this article or even the topic of sex, I'm interested in whether other people believe it too. I think it's the main difference between genders. That is, men will resist/fight their emotions to reason something out (even if it's the wrong thing to do), and women will attune to/understand/follow their emotions against reason (even if it's the wrong thing to do).
Women follow their emotions, and that leads them to sleep with men like me
I believe it's true that it's a small slice of the "guy pie" getting all that extra girl pie. It's most likely the engaging guys putting in all the effort to affect girls' moods and emotions that are having all the success. I've gotten this impression also from many women; it seems like if the right "mood" or "emotional state" is created within a woman, she's powerless to resist. It's as if the guy has "done his job" or "done things right" and therefore he must be rewarded. Very eerie. If you create a bad mood or emotion (or worse, emotionally neutral, rational discourse) you're pretty much fucked, but not literally.
A woman values her friend's opinions more than just about anything else in the world
.
This I don't even need a gun to my head to believe. You can engrave this on stone tablets somewhere.
BELIEVE YOUR OWN BULLSHIT.
Did anyone else think "war is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is bliss" here? Nothing like a little doublethink to make you a more effective politician/negotiator.
-------------------
The author said that he didn't start out viewing women this way, but that he has come to view them this way after meeting and knowing and fucking dozens of them. Now that he's had his exploits, he seems distressed that he can't ever have or enjoy a meaningful relationship because he could never trust *any* type of woman based on his experiences. So the posters claiming he won't ever find the "good" type of woman appear to be correct.
I'm interested in how his sexual partners felt after their encounters. I'm also interested in why, manipulated or not, all it takes is a little emotional button-pushing to get wild sex in short order from a large % of women in relationships. (again, IF what he says is true) We could change that to "a large % of people" but since I'm a straight guy I'm obviously more into the 'woman' side of the equation.
Let's assume it's 50/50. So half of women in commited relationships will easily cheat and half will not. How does on tell the difference? Rather than think about that, I'm going to save myself a mind fuck and go sleep.
![:\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif "wry grin :\")
i dont know, i just dont understand that mentality.
