thegreenhand
Bluelight Crew
I mean cmon
N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet
Like MDMA, I have found post late 199whatever LSD-025 to be significantly weaker than before. Would like to try much higher doses.
[/QUOTE
70-100 ug seems to be the standard today. Interesting to note that the 60s generation would have been taking 3-4x the dose someone today takes for their fist time. Certainly could change the culture around the drug
Can't beat starting with 12,000 times the normal dose.I took 1200 mg my first time.
Great bandI meant 1.2 mg (which is 1200 micrograms). Sorry.
agreed. i guess that's kinda why i asked it. should our definitions be based on subjective effects, structure, or pharmacology? idk if there's a clear answerwell the term "classical psychedelic" is a completely cultural invention with no scientific backing. pretty useless in my opinion.
well thinking it over, calling the term "useless" is not quite right. I guess it depends on the context in which one is talking about these drugs. from a pharmacology / chemistry viewpoint, it really doesn't make sense to use it, but since culture and the "hive mind" is very much at work shaping the psychedelic experiences people have, it makes sense to differentiate between psychedelics which have an appreciable history of consumption (decades with LSD, much much longer with plant and fungi based psychedelics) when talking about it from a sociology point of view.agreed. i guess that's kinda why i asked it. should our definitions be based on subjective effects, structure, or pharmacology? idk if there's a clear answer
I can agree with this for sure. I really do have to get my hands on mescaline one of these daysWhen I think of the term “classic psychedelic” 4 psychedelic drugs come to mind...
-Psilocybin
-LSD
-Mescaline
-DMT
IMO if you have these you don’t really need much else.
-GC