they're not the only ones......we already know they have a pre-determined conclusion...

alasdair
they're not the only ones......we already know they have a pre-determined conclusion...
Nature wants heterosexuality and nothing else.
^ What's your point? They also found a common gene among pedophiles, research it.
^ What's your point? They also found a common gene among pedophiles, research it. No one is arguing the genetics of it. What some are arguing is the choice or sexual act itself. See the difference? Pedos may have the genetic disposition for being attracted towards young boys. Are you telling me it's ok for them to act on these emotions? Gays keep saying they don't have a choice, but they do, the same choice a Pedo has when he sees a young kid. To suggest that homosexuality is not a choice is a real weak argument.
I'm just trying to stimulate thought and discussion without any bad intention towards any member from the gay community.
I really do not buy the genetics/born this way argument, or that the drive is encoded in the brain tissue. It is a learned behaviour/mind-set that is imprinted onto the mind during the early years of development post-birth. Nature wants heterosexuality and nothing else. I've got nothing against homosexuals but this incessant drive to prove it to be "normal" behaviour is just annoying as hell. If you want to be scientific about it that's great but we already know they have a pre-determined conclusion before even beginning an investigation! No one is going to prove to have abnormal behaviour. The changing of the mental illness status of homosexuality through political pressure and not science proved they want this normal stthemselvesatus regardless of what the truth actually is.
But this drive to prove it to be normal before the verdict is in.. give it a rest! The facts are pretty clear anyway.. we're here to reproduce and homosexuality doesn't cater to that, hence, it is not natural.
The rationalizations and "evidence" that gets put forward is pathetic at times, like the penile response to homosexual image study for example. I mean science is composed of humans and humans are not always completey impartial, but when it comes to homosexuality and science, going on known history, that impartially flew out the fucking window!
Sexual attraction is clearly a MENTAL phenomina, and not a biological or biochemical one. You project on to the man or woman that which you desire to see, or in the case of the paedo the child, the animal lover the animal etc. Now unfortunately science/psychology says the mind is/in the brain but this is bullshit, and this limits our perspective on the issue because we are (apparently) tied to that conclusion. But the mind is not the brain, it is a seperate thing somewhere non-local. Until that gets recognized no one is going to properly understand sexual attraction because that's where it takes place!
No I don't think it's a choice however I do think many more people than like to admit are bisexual but just repress their homosexual side, which is entirely possibly to choose to do.
The majority of girls I know accept a homosexual side but very few men do. I think the spectrum of sexuality for the male and female population looks prety similar but there's unfortunately more pressure on men to supress their gay side.
Also as regards to the choice thing I read about a very interesting study in newscientist about weather homosexuality is nature or nurture. They found that the more older sisters a boy has the higher the chances of them being gay are which indicates an influence from the mothers hormones during pregnancy. They canceled out the possibility that just growing up with girls could make you gay by taking into account boys that grew up with step sisters from a different mother.
Unfortunately I don't have a link but I think that this is pretty convincing evidence that sexuality is at least part nature.
they're not the only ones...
alasdair
Hey i'm just going on simple observational evidence. Nature is all about procreation, not pleasure.. pleasure is the bait to ensure procreation. Anatomy dictates male-female interaction. Any other form of sex is just man's rationalization for pleasure. Simple ^_^
i've tried gay (male on male) oral out of curiosity twice and neither time my dick got hard and it felt wrong. basically i tried being bisexual and it didn't work so based on my own experience i would say you can't choose to be gay.
WTF???? You sucked a dick to test if you were gay????? Not once but twice???? that is super gay, gayer than gay.
and gays procreate- being gay doesn't mean you cant have babies8(
lulwat?
Homo sex was also used by het men and women for bonding and/or conflict resolution where the lesser male would act out the part of a woman by being the 'bottom'.
no i got paid twice to let dudes suck my dick one time 50 one time 100 and didn't get hard either time. so actually it really wasn't out of curiousity it was for cash but i was like "shit i'll try to enjoy it" and did not enjoy it.WTF???? You sucked a dick to test if you were gay????? Not once but twice???? that is super gay, gayer than gay.