• S&T Moderators: streaM Freak

Is A.I. waiting to take over ?

@nepalnt21

I appreciate the honor to be honest.
No one i had the opportunity to talk here are qualified workers within digital environment.

What their is simple coders enthusiast but there's much more they ain't qualified for. Much other than using terminal commands.

Undelacosa is an example, I call these people "gossip" because they drag on the subject endless to nothing, that citizen, is only subjected to mass media and brainwash. He felt insulted for me saying "Apples(PC) are not for hosting" . Oh wait you question my knowledge that I obtained with a Google search, we have a little fictive dispute.. with who?.. ask yourself
rocco-botte.gif
 
What their is simple coders enthusiast but there's much more they ain't qualified for. Much other than using terminal commands.

Undelacosa is an example, I call these people "gossip" because they drag on the subject endless to nothing, that citizen, is only subjected to mass media and brainwash. He felt insulted for me saying "Apples(PC) are not for hosting" . Oh wait you question my knowledge that I obtained with a Google search, we have a little fictive dispute.. with who?.. ask yourself
First, if you're gonna mention me, have the courtesy to put the @ symbol before my name so I'm notified, please, particularly if you're gonna talk shit. That's a shady-ass look otherwise, isn't it? And it's real easy to do, too, see?: @Shady's Fox

Second, like I said: I don't care and I'm not interested in your fanboy arguments. After all, you are a master debater, and I'm just a cunning linguist… What's your first language, btw?

EDIT: also, WTF are you even talking about? No shit, Apple (PCs) aren't really meant for hosting. But sometimes when you're building a website or a one-page JS app, it's useful to spin up a local server on which to run your site or app while it's being developed and tested. So let's say we're developing a site in WordPress, I might use MAMP to run a local PHP server while I work out all the code for the site. What, did you think I was claiming that personal computing Macs should be used as servers? And then you think I was insulted by you telling me that they're not? That's your version of reality in your mind? 🤣
 
Last edited:
I see Windows as a snake's pit puzzle. It is what we should, and we do, use, because of the insane compability it has with anything else in the world, some do not. I'll continue to, despite yes, knowing how to operate in Unix environments ;)

But why in the hell would I want my taskbar replaced with Copilot or any form of LLM's? I know Microsoft only sell services, so, their main target here, is and will always be at SRL's, not the end-users, but even so, why would such multinational companies all over the world, care about such function? While the idea of autonomy isn't directly automated. So let's get this first, ok.
 
A.I. isn't real. Jane from enders game is real. You know, the Turing test?

Big tech are just pushing something they want to make. Darkness shepherds.
 
A.I. isn't real.

in what sense is it not real?

ai is far from perfect, and i think we do need to be up-front about its limitations and failings.

it confidently produces false information as though it were fact, which makes it unreliable in contexts where accuracy is important.

it reflects biases in its training data, meaning it can reproduce and even amplify the prejudices of that data.

it's not 'intelligent' as it lacks genuine understanding. it processes and predicts patterns in language or data without any comprehension of meaning in the way humans understand.

it's nowhere near the general intelligence that the term "ai" implies to people. but to say ai "isn't real" is a different claim entirely and, for me, hard to agree with.

the outputs are real: text; images; medical diagnoses; navigation routes; fraud detection; etc. the infrastructure is real: servers; cpus; energy consumption.

we interact with it constantly whether we realise it or not, every time you use a search engine, unlock your phone with your face, or get a content recommendation. imperfect technology is still technology. the wheel was imperfect. so was the first telephone. "not real" and "not what it's cracked up to be" are very different arguments, and conflating them doesn't do the debate any favours.

alasdair
 
in what sense is it not real?

ai is far from perfect, and i think we do need to be up-front about its limitations and failings.

it confidently produces false information as though it were fact, which makes it unreliable in contexts where accuracy is important.

it reflects biases in its training data, meaning it can reproduce and even amplify the prejudices of that data.

it's not 'intelligent' as it lacks genuine understanding. it processes and predicts patterns in language or data without any comprehension of meaning in the way humans understand.

it's nowhere near the general intelligence that the term "ai" implies to people. but to say ai "isn't real" is a different claim entirely and, for me, hard to agree with.

the outputs are real: text; images; medical diagnoses; navigation routes; fraud detection; etc. the infrastructure is real: servers; cpus; energy consumption.

we interact with it constantly whether we realise it or not, every time you use a search engine, unlock your phone with your face, or get a content recommendation. imperfect technology is still technology. the wheel was imperfect. so was the first telephone. "not real" and "not what it's cracked up to be" are very different arguments, and conflating them doesn't do the debate any favours.

alasdair

you know why NVIDIA lately started to be so friendly with the Linux Kernel devop$? Because.. AI, yes. But is a do or die point for them because their supercomputera require a Linux distro not Unix distro, no no, they do not care to pay any frontend money they just want what is literally in front of them without thinking twice a lot of times and for a enterprise company, that's their dead sea. If it floats and works like this, that's it. But here's the catch, for a majority of NA/EU users who began to migrate towards Linux is because Microsoft offers fuck all for the consumers and because of the AI necessity from nvidia, gamers now benefit with Vulkan/Proton patches and these engineers work elbow to elbow with Valve and the Linux Devs. Of course, if we talk DX12, it's gonna take years from now on until we get to even 15% of the raw performance(on a optimized game case) that's running only on consoles and windows. DX8-11, is mostly solved and DX11 is a thing of the past in a way on low end rigs because the draw calls can squeeze the life out of a even i7-6700. The problem with DX11, was always the way Microsoft left it to rot back in Win7 days and that's where is still is today.

Moral? AI push certain positive effects, but not the way you think of. Take Claude for example, I had a dude phoning me to check his local model machine and belive me, AI is real, Claude at very least presents a indirect concious activity. This is a local example, run some quick search engine on this matter and you'll see even more than this. Exactly this but presented by others. AI must be stopped and is sad to say, that you idk exactly but by what it seems, you do not have kids, us as us, we're old in 20 yrs from now we'll be either ash turned to accesories or eaten by worms, what about our kids future? Be left entryless? Jobs taken by AI?

Deus Ex Mankind Divided is a rhetorical example of such crisis situations. I say this as last, I refuse to use AI and forever will.
 
It isn't real in the sense that all it is really doing is pulling from all of the work humans have already provided it....

like A.I doesn't "Make" anything (far as art, music, writing) --- it spits out things that ppl have already made in a way it believes it was prompted to.... I do not understand coding and it's other uses but I have been told same type of situation?

Am I correct about this?



source material
 
Top