Irish ban on legal highs due in June

WeedMyLips

Bluelighter
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
151
Location
The land of the long white cloud
Ban on 'head shop' goods due by June

REGULATIONS WHICH will outlaw a range of products sold as “legal highs” in “head shops” across the State are to be introduced before June, the Department of Health has said.

A number of synthetic or herbal substances that mimic the effect of illegal drugs are to be brought under the control of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1977 because of the “ongoing health risks” associated with them, a spokeswoman for the department confirmed last night.

It is understood the regulations will apply to products such as Smoke and Snow, which are marketed as “pot pourri” and “stimulating bath salts” respectively but consumed in the same manner as cannabis and cocaine.

The move to make the substances illegal comes amid mounting criticism towards the Government from the Opposition, parents and anti-drugs groups who have called for a ban on head shops which have become increasingly common across the country.

Minister for Health Mary Harney said her department was preparing regulations, similar to those in Britain, which would introduce controls on a range of substances on sale in head shops.

British authorities banned a range of “legal highs” including GBL, which offers euphoric effects like ecstasy, and chemicals used to make herbal smoking products such as Smoke in December.

“This will make the possession and sale of these substances illegal and subject to criminal sanctions under the Misuse of Drugs Act,” Ms Harney said.

In 2006, the department introduced regulations which banned psychotropic (magic) mushrooms, while last year it banned BZP, then a legal alternative to ecstasy.

Ms Harney also said her department was working closely with Minister of State for Drugs John Curran, who was co-ordinating a Government response across various departments to tackle the problems associated with the proliferation of head shops.

Earlier yesterday, Donegal TD Dr Jim McDaid said he believed introducing an across-the-board ban on head shops and their products would be a “colossal mistake”. Dr McDaid said this would push the substances onto the streets and into the control of drug dealers. “I honestly believe that if we ban these head shops or substances we are on the verge of making one huge colossal mistake with regard to the problem of drugs in this country,” he told Newstalk’s Lunchtime with Eamon Keane.

Dr McDaid, a former minister who lost the Fianna Fáil party whip in 2008 when he abstained on a vote on the cervical cancer vaccine, said a campaign educating people of the dangers of the products rather than a ban would be the best way forward.

STEVEN CARROLL
February 5, 2010
Irish Times
http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2010/0205/1224263813951.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How strange. The article doesn't actually say which substances they are banning...


British authorities banned a range of “legal highs” including GBL, which offers euphoric effects like ecstasy...

GBL is nothing like ecstasy in any way!


Ms Harney also said her department was working closely with Minister of State for Drugs John Curran, who was co-ordinating a Government response across various departments to tackle the problems associated with the proliferation of head shops.

What problems are these?
 
Head shops ban will only benefit drug dealers

McDaid: Head shops ban will only benefit drug dealers

By Jennifer Hough

Friday, February 05, 2010

BANNING synthetic legal drugs, on sale in alternative lifestyle shops, is a mistake and will simply create another layer to the illegal drugs trade, Fianna Fáil TD Jim McDaid has claimed.

The controversial Donegal TD yesterday spoke out on the issue, saying he did not believe they should be shut down or their substances banned as it would simply drive the trade into the hands of drugs dealers.

Head shops have been the subject of much debate recently as they sell substances labelled as plant food or bath salts, but which have the same effects as cocaine and ecstasy.

Last year, one of the drugs on sale, BZP, was banned, as it has been in other European countries.

However speaking on Joe Duffy’s Liveline, Mr McDaid said he had been completely opposed to the ban but never spoke out.

He said it had now become a "street drug", and had become a gateway drug for young people into harder drugs.

Mr McDaid, who has hit the headlines previously for driving drunk the wrong way down a dual carriageway, said the reason new substances made to replace BZP were now being legislated for was "purely populist".

Mr McDaid said he had sent a memo to the minister with responsibility for drugs, John Curran, expressing his views.

New Zealand was the first country where party pill BZP flourished, and was eventually banned. It is, however, only classified as a Class D drug, recognising it as a "low-risk substance".

Speaking in the Seanad earlier this week Minister for Health, Mary Harney, said she was moving to ban new substances which had become popular since the banning of BZP – including mephedrone which has been the subject of debate in Britain in recent months.

The minister said she had never been in a head shop, but she understood they varied from big emporiums that sell various bizarre products to mainstream herbal shops where, among other things, they sell these highly dangerous products.

"They are targeted at vulnerable and young people especially," she said.

However, Ms Harney did admit staying one step ahead of those making the legal drugs was going to prove almost impossible.

"This is where the legislation is difficult. We must ensure that we define by chemical compound what it is we are banning because many of the substances have legitimacy and are used in the legitimate pharmaceutical industry or, indeed, in the plastics industry. For example, there are products known as trazodone and nefazodone that are legally used. In the UK, for example, they did not ban what is commonly known here as "snow", which, I think, is known as mephedrone, and we hope to ban that.

"The reason for the difficulty is that many of these substances have legitimate uses," she said.



This story appeared in the printed version of the Irish Examiner Friday, February 05, 2010

Read more: http://www.irishexaminer.com/irelan...enefit-drug-dealers-111368.html#ixzz0ezjcrIzm
 
Abso-mutha-fuckin-lutely!

Apply this to the whole of prohibition and you have the same problem :\
 
New Zealand was the first country where party pill BZP flourished, and was eventually banned. It is, however, only classified as a Class D drug, recognising it as a "low-risk substance".

Yes, and BZP has now gone underground and is sometimes being passed-off as ecstasy to unsuspecting buyers. Bans on head shops are unenforceable. Here in New Zealand, weed pipes are sold as tobacco pipes and meth pipes are sold as aromatherapy pipes. As for the legal highs, as soon as one substance is banned another new one will appear. The government will never be able to keep up with it.
 
McDaid is right. Driving our pleasures and comforts underground won't stop us from seeking them. It will just give those underground control over quality and pricing, and make all of us less safe.

"The reason for the difficulty is that many of these substances have legitimate uses," she said.

Um, are you putting yourself in the position of deciding which uses are legitimate? If I want to smoke some dried flowers that make me laugh, is there some reason that is not legitimate? If I want to eat some mushrooms that make me see colors and re-evaluate my life, is that not legitimate?

I get a strong feeling her definition of "legitimate" has to do with big companies making money. :|
 
I think they're basically saying that the drug laws are fucked all over. Like how Trazodone (and Nefazodone) is a medically used chemical yet is still unscheduled in the UK and Ireland.

p.s. Meph ;) hehe
 
I'm sure (shit there better be) is now, because the last time I was in rehab a few years back, I remember some real pill head in there talking about how little research there was on trazodone, yet it was the number one prescribed sleep med, over ambien even, during that time.
 
I'd imagine there's a bit more known about it now, but yes it's strange as there is very little known about it compared to other groups of Antideps...
It's purely described as an "Augmenter" rather than a Tri-Tetracyclic/SSRI/SNRI etc.
 
Yeah governments should be looking to NZ to see how this actually impacts the country. BZP was banned after it was a 'legal high' you could buy from *every* single convenience store/dairy. Now its getting mixed in E or getting sold as E and even sold as bzp to some fiends who really like that shit... which is exactly what it is, shit.

Everytime they ban one substance a new one appears, a new one that could be carcinogenic, or cause fucked up long term effects.
 
Top