• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Interracial Mixing

KaideAlike44

KaideAlike44

Bluelighter
Joined
Nov 2, 2003
Messages
474
Location
USA
This was taken from another thread:


Are we diversify enough so that we wouldn't be able to mate with each other?

the races are physicaly and pyscologicaly DIFFERENT..

the dangers are in mixing abilities...sometimes we lose abilities and gain nothing..

sometimes those with high abilities are pulled DOWN by mixing with "lower people"..

would you want to mix with a black african? and let your child have his traits?..

I wouldnt..

blacks havnt invented much of anything in THOUSANDS OF YEARS..they still EAT EACHOTHER in the congo...ect ect..

who would want those things in their child?..

think about DISEASES..yes..diseases may not discriminate but they can ORIGINATE in dofferent races..

jews and blacks are the best canidates for sickle cell anemia..

would you RISK planting such a horrific disea into YOUR FAMILY?...

the world isnt what you think...we live in a PC world dominated by liberal assholes who supress the FACTS inorder to maintain harmony..

but this tactic will not beat mother nature forever..


Does anyone else agree with this person? Why would it be wrong to diversify the human species. Is there something wrong with mixing races? Are there dangers to mixing races?
 
To the author of the quoted portion:

Hello. I'm one of those liberal assholes. :)

Diversity is important on all levels. There are more possibilities that way, more chances for adaptability, and the appriopriate materials by which we can evolve. A world without multi-leveled diversity would be stagnant, boring, rigidly predictable, and much less apt to survive.

Blacks and whites may be physiologically and psychologically different, and through `mixing' we may often loose things, but we can gain things as well. And if you don't think blacks have contributed anything in thousands of years, perhaps you're only thinking in terms of what you consider value and not the values of other people or even people -- black, white, whatever -- as a whole.

Us `liberals' are different from you not so much because we `supress the facts' but because we choose different values. And I, for one, value diversity and free choice, which seem to me to be intimately connected -- that's enough for me to support interracial marrages, same-sex marrages, or whatever kind of relationship, sexual or otherwise, that people want to engage in so long as both (or all) parties involved concent, if that is what floats their boats. Being a heterosexual white boy that seems to be attracted to slender white girls of the gothic persuasion doesn't inspire me to ban everyone else's right to choose what they want in another person and label my own preferences the rule.

Mother nature is all for diversity. Look around. Unless you're implying something supernatural, we are are natural, and every choice we make is equally natural.
 
The thing i find amusing about every racist rant that i've ever read is that it ingores the fact that race really doesn't exist on a genetic level. In fact, there are greater genetic differences between two unrelated people of the same race as there are between the average genetic makeup of any spefic racial group. In essence, the differences are entirely aesthetic.

Most racists like to attribute cultural aspects to race, which simply isn't true. While statistics support that claim by in large (For example, the rates of heart attacks, high blood pressure, and other cardiac disease are significantly higher in the black community than the white community in the US), it's ingorant to pass these differences to race alone. Cultural differences exist, and the mere existance of the concept of racism helps contribute to it actually being a legitmate idea. (Meaning, through the discrimination of minorites, disparites start to form between them as a whole)
 
<<The thing i find amusing about every racist rant that i've ever read is that it ingores the fact that race really doesn't exist on a genetic level. In fact, there are greater genetic differences between two unrelated people of the same race as there are between the average genetic makeup of any spefic racial group. In essence, the differences are entirely aesthetic.>>

The post of the day. Racism tells us more about how people think than about what really exists in the world.
 
That's the most idiotic thing I have ever read. Every 'race' has unique genes to offer the whole world. Sickle Cell might be bad in some ways but it keeps people from dying of Malaria at the same time. Africans are obviously more athletically inclined and have lower rates of disease after age 65 or so than most other races. The mixing of races is the best thing that can happen to humankind.
 
There is only one race -the human race though there is a huge diversity of stupidity and ignorance. The only difference between a coloured and a non-coloured person is the tiny bit of chemical that creates coloured skin. Though having coloured skin is beneficial, as it helps against the radiation from the sun.
 
I think having homologous and heterozygous offspring are both good and bad in their own ways. It is best to have both.
 
Five words. I love hot black women. Diversity always survives, staying in the same gene pool isn't actually healthy either, but I just love light skinned/black chicks, damn, hot.
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking I should probably start a new thread about this, but do you think it would be better if everyone was just one race? I'm not talking once race is better than others 3rd Reich style, I'm talking about if everyone was blue with green stripes race or something. Not only would that eliminate racial tensions, but give everyone a common ground. 'Diversity' is only valuable because of different cultural backgrounds. Most institutions that support 'diversity' are racist in themselves, saying that having a racially diverse community is good because it helps broaden your world view or some shit. They implement this by attributing a culture to a race. Isn't that racism, saying that every member of a race shares the same culture? They may have the same heritage, but not the same culture. The green and blue striped people will still have different cultures, they just won't be identifiable by sight. Not every blue and green person will be of the same intelligence and status. This should be the ultimate objectivism, judging by merit instead of race or sight.
 
If racism did not exist, I would love to be black!
sunburns would be rare for me indeed. :)
and plenty of vitamin D would be in my soymilk.
 
punktuality said:
I cant remember who said it but i love this quote:

"Lets just all fuck untill we are all the same colour"
Click to expand...

I want the bumper sticker!!!;)



Africans are obviously more athletically
Click to expand...

Actually i think its African- Americans not just african decent who posses this trait so to speak.

My reasoning behind this is cuz slaves were only desired if they were tall, strong, athletic ect. to work on the plantations.....Now u do this and let them mate for many generations, u have more atheltically inclined people through desirable traits for physical work.
 
Supposedly Africans have an extra muscle in the thigh according to a friends weight training teacher. I wouldn't be surprised if that was bullshit though.
 
There is no way to say one race is superior to another unless you could have them all exist in the same conditions. Historically black people at least in america have lived in the "lower income" areas, the ghetto, and life is much different there. How can you say that they are automatically less intelligent than white people when the majority of them are never afforded a good education like those that the middle and upper class get.

I would agree with Hypnotik1 that it's not so much that black people are more inclined to be athletic, but they are (for lack of better word) bred to be athletic.

I don't think anyone can accurately say one race has any benefits over another, at least not with the evidence we have now.
 
well there are benefits but these dont make any race *better*. africans have dark skin and taller bodies to protect against sun and heat. eskimoes are shorter and carry fat easier to help them survive in the cold.

the important thing is that we actually have diversity, so if the world got extremely hot, we would have a greater chance of at least some of us surviving. same goes for if it got suddenly very cold. the broader our range of diversity, the more adaptable we are to our environment and therefore more likely to survive.

oh and blacks are more athletic cos they spend so much time running from the cops (hehehe just kidding :p gotta love the bad taste humor)
 
yougene said:
Supposedly Africans have an extra muscle in the thigh according to a friends weight training teacher. I wouldn't be surprised if that was bullshit though.
Click to expand...

lol, my friend actually told me that black girls have an extra muscle in their ass which squeezes your dick tighter when fucking them doggy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top