You say im part of a minority, but is there any concrete studies that show the majority of people who try / use meth get addicted? If such evidence exists then I stand corrected, though I'm just basing my opinion on the fact that, out of all the people I've met who use meth, none of them have been addicted, but rather just used it when out at a club or something similar.
Im not going to dispute that a meth addiction is highly damaging, but the problem is, people are getting it anyway. Same for all drugs. They waste alot of money on a hugely overpriced product as a result of the blackmarket, and this is solely the reason some resort to robbing in the first place. Whats worse, the money contributes to (in many cases) syndicates that use it to commit far worse crimes than just selling drugs. There is also no regard for the consumers health, from contaminations of a back yard lab, to the dealer that will continually push it to customers. There aren't any warnings (compared to say, ciggarettes with warning on each pack) about how highly neurotoxic the substance is, nor just how badly it can ruin a persons life. You could say the government has tried to warn people about the dangers, but by merely presenting scare tactics, users are likely to disregard the message.
Our society probably would be much safer if there werent any addicts to hard drugs such as meth, but the drug is so widely available, so highly sought after and so easily produced that it will never realistically be eliminated through prohibtion. The only way we are going to see a decrease in meth use is when drug trends change (as seems inevitable) and another drug will fill the gap. Instead of waiting till that happens and maximising the harm done to users, I think it would be better if we acknowledged the fact that this substance is widely used, and try to help those that consume it, by providing factual information about safety and the dangers of meth, and by providing a sterile, clean product, at a more reasonable price. And if the Netherlands is anything to go by, then legalisation won't cause a massive increase in drug use either.
I'm only discussing here too dont get me wrong, I just dont see prohibition as being an effective way at controlling drug use.
I'm sorry to hear about the damage meth has caused to some of your friends. I dont think banning meth is the right solution for this type of problem though. I concur with what BT said on page 1.
BigTrancer said:
Maybe it's the people that are ruining their own lives, by continually taking the drug, instead of exercising their
willpower and using in
moderation...?
BigTrancer