N&PD Moderators: Skorpio | someguyontheinternet
Otherwise, I would be very interested to know more on the properties of this cyclic version of mescaline:
![]()
It doesn't fit in the classical SAR of psychedelics or stimulants, but it's quite close to pellotine, which is the main alkaloid of lophophora diffusa (old source: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/647075 ).
So, could be active!
^Why the 6-methyl?
I wonder how trading out Tryptamine's Nitrogen for an Oxygen to produce 3-(2-aminoethyl)benzofuran would work for tryptamine derivatives - we could get N,N-DM... EB? BF? Numbering system is same so we could get the 4-HO/5-MeOs.
LOL :D It looks like a joke, ha, awesome.
Shulgin mentions these 2 under the BOD entry in PIHKALlol
D.E.A (3,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylamphetamine)
![]()
Would the Chloro-thio-methyl functional group come off in the body and be poisonous like mustard gas? I guess that what your saying, right?
Kind of - the chlorine comes off to give a sulfonium ion, which is really good at binding to DNA and lots of other things.
Loving those other two you've drawn
Would it be possible to engineer a µ/δ agonist with comparable strength to morphine that also acts as a selective, H1/2 antagonist? The idea came to me tonight thinking about how itchy this OP 80 has made me. A powerful opioid that keeps one from getting itchy and nauseated would just be so bad ass.
Delta agonists tend to produce convulsions. Why do you want delta agonist activity tacked on there in the first place?